Performance of the Visual-Motor Integration of Preschool Children in Hong Kong

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2015-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.06.002
Miranda Ng, Mandy Chui, Lenzs Lin, Anita Fong, Donna Chan
{"title":"Performance of the Visual-Motor Integration of Preschool Children in Hong Kong","authors":"Miranda Ng,&nbsp;Mandy Chui,&nbsp;Lenzs Lin,&nbsp;Anita Fong,&nbsp;Donna Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective/Background</h3><p>The Beery–Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (VMI) is an important assessment tool used by occupational therapists working with children. The aims of this study were (a) to identify performance differences in the VMI between Hong Kong preschool children and their counterparts in the United States; (b) to develop local references for the VMI (fifth edition) for the preschool children in Hong Kong; and (c) to examine the dimensionality and the hierarchical ordering of the VMI items using the Rasch Measurement Model (RMM).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 288 healthy children aged between 3 years and 6 months and 5 years and 11 months were recruited from 54 local preschools in Hong Kong using the multistage sampling method. VMI was administered to the children individually at their preschools.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Hong Kong preschool children were significantly better than those in the United States in VMI performance (<em>p</em> &lt; .001). The results of the RMM showed that the VMI fell within the acceptable levels of unidimensionality. Most items were found to be hierarchically ordered, although a few items were found to have the same level of difficulty.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The local reference developed in this study yielded additional insights for occupational therapists and psychologists with regard to the application of the VMI (fifth edition) for Hong Kong children aged between 3 years and 6 months and 5 years and 11 months.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55049,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.06.002","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569186115000248","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Objective/Background

The Beery–Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (VMI) is an important assessment tool used by occupational therapists working with children. The aims of this study were (a) to identify performance differences in the VMI between Hong Kong preschool children and their counterparts in the United States; (b) to develop local references for the VMI (fifth edition) for the preschool children in Hong Kong; and (c) to examine the dimensionality and the hierarchical ordering of the VMI items using the Rasch Measurement Model (RMM).

Methods

A total of 288 healthy children aged between 3 years and 6 months and 5 years and 11 months were recruited from 54 local preschools in Hong Kong using the multistage sampling method. VMI was administered to the children individually at their preschools.

Results

Hong Kong preschool children were significantly better than those in the United States in VMI performance (p < .001). The results of the RMM showed that the VMI fell within the acceptable levels of unidimensionality. Most items were found to be hierarchically ordered, although a few items were found to have the same level of difficulty.

Conclusion

The local reference developed in this study yielded additional insights for occupational therapists and psychologists with regard to the application of the VMI (fifth edition) for Hong Kong children aged between 3 years and 6 months and 5 years and 11 months.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
香港学龄前儿童视觉-运动整合的表现
目的/背景Beery-Buktenica视觉运动整合发展测试(VMI)是儿童职业治疗师使用的重要评估工具。本研究的目的是(a)找出香港学龄前儿童与美国学龄前儿童在VMI方面的表现差异;(b)为香港学龄前儿童编制第5版的本地参考资料;(c)利用Rasch测量模型(RMM)检验VMI项目的维度和层次顺序。方法采用多阶段抽样方法,从香港54所幼儿园招募3 ~ 6个月和5 ~ 11个月的健康儿童288名。VMI对学龄前儿童进行了单独的治疗。结果香港学龄前儿童的VMI表现显著优于美国学龄前儿童(p <措施)。RMM的结果表明,VMI的单维性在可接受的范围内。大多数项目被发现是按等级顺序排列的,尽管有一些项目被发现具有相同的难度水平。结论本研究提供的本地参考资料,为职业治疗师和心理学家在香港3岁至6个月及5岁至11个月的儿童中应用VMI(第五版)提供了额外的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy is the official peer-reviewed open access publication of the Hong Kong Occupational Therapy Association. The Journal aims to promote the development of theory and practice in occupational therapy (OT), and facilitate documentation and communication among educators, researchers and practitioners. It also works to advance availability, use, support and excellence of OT and maintain professional standards to promote better understanding of OT.
期刊最新文献
Validity and reliability of the functional test for hemiplegic upper Extremity–Thai version Stigma and the use of umbrellas, hiking poles and walking sticks to aid walking in Hong Kong Application of the participatory design in the testing of a baropodometric insole prototype for weight-bearing asymmetry after a stroke: A qualitative study Smartwatch-based functional assessment for upper extremity impairment after musculoskeletal injuries: A pilot study Work-support techniques used by occupational therapists to facilitate support after acquired brain injuries: A qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1