Impact of Glaucoma on Quality of Life and Activities of Daily Living

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2015-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.04.002
Sangshin Park , Young Lim Kho , Hyo-Jin Kim , JiHyun Kim , Eun-Hee Lee
{"title":"Impact of Glaucoma on Quality of Life and Activities of Daily Living","authors":"Sangshin Park ,&nbsp;Young Lim Kho ,&nbsp;Hyo-Jin Kim ,&nbsp;JiHyun Kim ,&nbsp;Eun-Hee Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective/Background</h3><p>This study was performed to assess the associations of glaucoma with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and activities of daily living (ADL).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III in 2005, we analysed 9,047 participants (≥ 50 years old) and 3,518 participants (≥ 65 years old) to assess the associations of glaucoma with HRQOL and ADL, respectively. The diagnosis of glaucoma was based on questionnaires. HRQOL was evaluated by the EuroQol five-dimension descriptive system (EQ-5D) and the EuroQol visual analogue scale. The ADL was evaluated by the Korean-optimised ADL questionnaire. Logistic-regression analyses were used to assess the associations of glaucoma with HRQOL and ADL.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The glaucoma patients showed lower HRQOL and ADL scores compared to the healthy participants. The glaucoma patients showed significantly higher prevalence of impaired health status in all dimensions of EQ-5D, as well as in the “bathing” dimension of ADL as compared with the healthy participants. Impaired HRQOL and ADL were significantly associated with the risk of glaucomatous status (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] of EQ-5D: 1.65 [1.33, 2.05], EuroQol visual analogue scale: 1.75 [1.43, 2.15], and ADL: 2.04 [1.12, 3.74]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In line with previous studies conducted in other countries, Koreans with glaucoma had impaired HRQOL and ADL as compared with healthy Koreans.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55049,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.hkjot.2015.04.002","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569186115000236","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objective/Background

This study was performed to assess the associations of glaucoma with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and activities of daily living (ADL).

Methods

Using data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III in 2005, we analysed 9,047 participants (≥ 50 years old) and 3,518 participants (≥ 65 years old) to assess the associations of glaucoma with HRQOL and ADL, respectively. The diagnosis of glaucoma was based on questionnaires. HRQOL was evaluated by the EuroQol five-dimension descriptive system (EQ-5D) and the EuroQol visual analogue scale. The ADL was evaluated by the Korean-optimised ADL questionnaire. Logistic-regression analyses were used to assess the associations of glaucoma with HRQOL and ADL.

Results

The glaucoma patients showed lower HRQOL and ADL scores compared to the healthy participants. The glaucoma patients showed significantly higher prevalence of impaired health status in all dimensions of EQ-5D, as well as in the “bathing” dimension of ADL as compared with the healthy participants. Impaired HRQOL and ADL were significantly associated with the risk of glaucomatous status (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] of EQ-5D: 1.65 [1.33, 2.05], EuroQol visual analogue scale: 1.75 [1.43, 2.15], and ADL: 2.04 [1.12, 3.74]).

Conclusion

In line with previous studies conducted in other countries, Koreans with glaucoma had impaired HRQOL and ADL as compared with healthy Koreans.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青光眼对生活质量和日常生活活动的影响
目的/背景本研究旨在评估青光眼与健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)和日常生活活动(ADL)的关系。方法利用2005年韩国国家健康与营养调查III的数据,我们分析了9047名参与者(≥50岁)和3518名参与者(≥65岁),分别评估青光眼与HRQOL和ADL的关系。青光眼的诊断基于问卷调查。采用EuroQol五维描述系统(EQ-5D)和EuroQol视觉模拟量表评价HRQOL。ADL采用韩国优化的ADL问卷进行评价。采用logistic回归分析评估青光眼与HRQOL和ADL的关系。结果青光眼患者HRQOL和ADL评分均低于健康组。青光眼患者在EQ-5D的所有维度以及ADL的“沐浴”维度中健康状况受损的患病率明显高于健康者。HRQOL和ADL受损与青光眼状态的风险显著相关(EQ-5D比值比[95%可信区间]:1.65 [1.33,2.05],EuroQol视觉模拟量表:1.75 [1.43,2.15],ADL: 2.04[1.12, 3.74])。结论韩国青光眼患者的HRQOL和ADL均低于健康韩国人,与其他国家的研究结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy is the official peer-reviewed open access publication of the Hong Kong Occupational Therapy Association. The Journal aims to promote the development of theory and practice in occupational therapy (OT), and facilitate documentation and communication among educators, researchers and practitioners. It also works to advance availability, use, support and excellence of OT and maintain professional standards to promote better understanding of OT.
期刊最新文献
Validity and reliability of the functional test for hemiplegic upper Extremity–Thai version Stigma and the use of umbrellas, hiking poles and walking sticks to aid walking in Hong Kong Application of the participatory design in the testing of a baropodometric insole prototype for weight-bearing asymmetry after a stroke: A qualitative study Smartwatch-based functional assessment for upper extremity impairment after musculoskeletal injuries: A pilot study Work-support techniques used by occupational therapists to facilitate support after acquired brain injuries: A qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1