Risk factors predisposing to fetal loss following a second trimester amniocentesis

Nikolaos E. Papantoniou, George J. Daskalakis, John G. Tziotis, Stylianos J. Kitmirides, Spyros A. Mesogitis, Aris J. Antsaklis
{"title":"Risk factors predisposing to fetal loss following a second trimester amniocentesis","authors":"Nikolaos E. Papantoniou,&nbsp;George J. Daskalakis,&nbsp;John G. Tziotis,&nbsp;Stylianos J. Kitmirides,&nbsp;Spyros A. Mesogitis,&nbsp;Aris J. Antsaklis","doi":"10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00246-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objective</strong> To examine the influence of possible risk factors on fetal loss rate following amniocentesis.</p><p><strong>Design</strong> Retrospective analysis of case records between 1993 and 1998.</p><p><strong>Setting</strong> Fetal medicine unit of a large teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Population</strong> One thousand and six women with singleton pregnancies formed the study group. Seven hundred and eight of them had bleeding during the current pregnancy before the procedure, while 298 had a history of three or more first trimester abortions and/or a second trimester miscarriage or termination of pregnancy. Four thousand and twenty-four women who had amniocentesis and had no risk factors served as controls. Both groups were also classified according to maternal age. Group 1: 1610 women aged 20–34 years; Group 2: 2850 women aged 35–39 years; Group 3; 570 women &gt; 40 years.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong> Women of both groups underwent a second trimester amniocentesis between 16 and 21 weeks of gestation. Fetal losses following amniocentesis were examined in three time intervals: 1. in the first two weeks after the procedure; 2. up to the 28<sup>th</sup> week; 3. from the 28<sup>th</sup> week to term.</p><p><strong>Results</strong> There was a statistically significant difference in the fetal loss rate between women aged 20–34 years (2.54%) and those &gt; 40 years (5.1%). Women with a history of vaginal bleeding during the current pregnancy had a higher fetal loss rate compared with controls (6.5% <em>vs</em> 2.8%), which corresponds to an odds ratio of 2.4 (95% CI 1.69–3.42). A similar difference was found between the group of women with a history of previous abortions/terminations and the controls (8% <em>vs</em> 2.8%): OR 3.03 (95% CI 1.92–4.79).</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong> There is a higher risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis in women &gt; 40 years of age compared with those aged 20–34 years. Bleeding in the current pregnancy, a history of three or more first trimester abortions, a second trimester miscarriage or termination of pregnancy seem to be significant predisposing factors for fetal loss after an amniocentesis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75620,"journal":{"name":"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology","volume":"108 10","pages":"Pages 1053-1056"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00246-7","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306545601002467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To examine the influence of possible risk factors on fetal loss rate following amniocentesis.

Design Retrospective analysis of case records between 1993 and 1998.

Setting Fetal medicine unit of a large teaching hospital.

Population One thousand and six women with singleton pregnancies formed the study group. Seven hundred and eight of them had bleeding during the current pregnancy before the procedure, while 298 had a history of three or more first trimester abortions and/or a second trimester miscarriage or termination of pregnancy. Four thousand and twenty-four women who had amniocentesis and had no risk factors served as controls. Both groups were also classified according to maternal age. Group 1: 1610 women aged 20–34 years; Group 2: 2850 women aged 35–39 years; Group 3; 570 women > 40 years.

Methods Women of both groups underwent a second trimester amniocentesis between 16 and 21 weeks of gestation. Fetal losses following amniocentesis were examined in three time intervals: 1. in the first two weeks after the procedure; 2. up to the 28th week; 3. from the 28th week to term.

Results There was a statistically significant difference in the fetal loss rate between women aged 20–34 years (2.54%) and those > 40 years (5.1%). Women with a history of vaginal bleeding during the current pregnancy had a higher fetal loss rate compared with controls (6.5% vs 2.8%), which corresponds to an odds ratio of 2.4 (95% CI 1.69–3.42). A similar difference was found between the group of women with a history of previous abortions/terminations and the controls (8% vs 2.8%): OR 3.03 (95% CI 1.92–4.79).

Conclusions There is a higher risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis in women > 40 years of age compared with those aged 20–34 years. Bleeding in the current pregnancy, a history of three or more first trimester abortions, a second trimester miscarriage or termination of pregnancy seem to be significant predisposing factors for fetal loss after an amniocentesis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠中期羊膜穿刺术导致胎儿丢失的危险因素
目的探讨羊膜穿刺术后可能的危险因素对胎儿脱胎率的影响。设计回顾性分析1993 - 1998年的病例记录。设大型教学医院胎儿医学单元。研究小组由1606名单胎妊娠妇女组成。其中778人在手术前有过妊娠出血史,298人有过三次或三次以上妊娠早期流产和/或妊娠中期流产或终止妊娠史。42424名接受羊膜穿刺术且无危险因素的女性作为对照。两组还根据母亲的年龄进行了分类。第一组:1610名女性,年龄20-34岁;第二组:2850名女性,年龄35-39岁;组3;570名妇女>40年。方法两组妇女均于妊娠16 ~ 21周行中期羊膜穿刺术。在三个时间间隔检查羊膜穿刺术后胎儿损失:1。手术后两周内;2. 至第28周;3.从28周到足月。结果20 ~ 34岁产妇的胎儿丢失率(2.54%)与35 ~ 34岁产妇的胎儿丢失率(2.54%)有统计学差异。40年(5.1%)。妊娠期间有阴道出血史的妇女与对照组相比,胎儿丢失率更高(6.5% vs 2.8%),优势比为2.4 (95% CI 1.69-3.42)。在有堕胎/终止妊娠史的妇女组和对照组之间发现了类似的差异(8% vs 2.8%): OR 3.03 (95% CI 1.92-4.79)。结论女性羊膜穿刺术后胎儿丢失的风险较高;40岁与20-34岁的人相比。妊娠出血、三次或三次以上妊娠早期流产史、妊娠中期流产或终止妊娠似乎是羊膜穿刺术后胎儿丢失的重要易感因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of the COVID pandemic on gynaecological cancer surgery - COVIDSurg gynaecological-cancer results Re: The outcome of pregnancy in women with cystic fibrosis: a UK population based descriptive study. (First comment on BJOG-20-0094.R1) Treat the patient, not the disease Prescribing antidepressants and anxiolytic medications to pregnant women: The perception of risk of foetal teratogenicity amongst Australian specialists and trainees The impact of maternal characteristics on acquisition of placental volume images and vascularisation indices in high risk pregnancies in the first trimester.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1