Nikolaos E. Papantoniou, George J. Daskalakis, John G. Tziotis, Stylianos J. Kitmirides, Spyros A. Mesogitis, Aris J. Antsaklis
{"title":"Risk factors predisposing to fetal loss following a second trimester amniocentesis","authors":"Nikolaos E. Papantoniou, George J. Daskalakis, John G. Tziotis, Stylianos J. Kitmirides, Spyros A. Mesogitis, Aris J. Antsaklis","doi":"10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00246-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objective</strong> To examine the influence of possible risk factors on fetal loss rate following amniocentesis.</p><p><strong>Design</strong> Retrospective analysis of case records between 1993 and 1998.</p><p><strong>Setting</strong> Fetal medicine unit of a large teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Population</strong> One thousand and six women with singleton pregnancies formed the study group. Seven hundred and eight of them had bleeding during the current pregnancy before the procedure, while 298 had a history of three or more first trimester abortions and/or a second trimester miscarriage or termination of pregnancy. Four thousand and twenty-four women who had amniocentesis and had no risk factors served as controls. Both groups were also classified according to maternal age. Group 1: 1610 women aged 20–34 years; Group 2: 2850 women aged 35–39 years; Group 3; 570 women > 40 years.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong> Women of both groups underwent a second trimester amniocentesis between 16 and 21 weeks of gestation. Fetal losses following amniocentesis were examined in three time intervals: 1. in the first two weeks after the procedure; 2. up to the 28<sup>th</sup> week; 3. from the 28<sup>th</sup> week to term.</p><p><strong>Results</strong> There was a statistically significant difference in the fetal loss rate between women aged 20–34 years (2.54%) and those > 40 years (5.1%). Women with a history of vaginal bleeding during the current pregnancy had a higher fetal loss rate compared with controls (6.5% <em>vs</em> 2.8%), which corresponds to an odds ratio of 2.4 (95% CI 1.69–3.42). A similar difference was found between the group of women with a history of previous abortions/terminations and the controls (8% <em>vs</em> 2.8%): OR 3.03 (95% CI 1.92–4.79).</p><p><strong>Conclusions</strong> There is a higher risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis in women > 40 years of age compared with those aged 20–34 years. Bleeding in the current pregnancy, a history of three or more first trimester abortions, a second trimester miscarriage or termination of pregnancy seem to be significant predisposing factors for fetal loss after an amniocentesis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75620,"journal":{"name":"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology","volume":"108 10","pages":"Pages 1053-1056"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00246-7","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306545601002467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective To examine the influence of possible risk factors on fetal loss rate following amniocentesis.
Design Retrospective analysis of case records between 1993 and 1998.
Setting Fetal medicine unit of a large teaching hospital.
Population One thousand and six women with singleton pregnancies formed the study group. Seven hundred and eight of them had bleeding during the current pregnancy before the procedure, while 298 had a history of three or more first trimester abortions and/or a second trimester miscarriage or termination of pregnancy. Four thousand and twenty-four women who had amniocentesis and had no risk factors served as controls. Both groups were also classified according to maternal age. Group 1: 1610 women aged 20–34 years; Group 2: 2850 women aged 35–39 years; Group 3; 570 women > 40 years.
Methods Women of both groups underwent a second trimester amniocentesis between 16 and 21 weeks of gestation. Fetal losses following amniocentesis were examined in three time intervals: 1. in the first two weeks after the procedure; 2. up to the 28th week; 3. from the 28th week to term.
Results There was a statistically significant difference in the fetal loss rate between women aged 20–34 years (2.54%) and those > 40 years (5.1%). Women with a history of vaginal bleeding during the current pregnancy had a higher fetal loss rate compared with controls (6.5% vs 2.8%), which corresponds to an odds ratio of 2.4 (95% CI 1.69–3.42). A similar difference was found between the group of women with a history of previous abortions/terminations and the controls (8% vs 2.8%): OR 3.03 (95% CI 1.92–4.79).
Conclusions There is a higher risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis in women > 40 years of age compared with those aged 20–34 years. Bleeding in the current pregnancy, a history of three or more first trimester abortions, a second trimester miscarriage or termination of pregnancy seem to be significant predisposing factors for fetal loss after an amniocentesis.
目的探讨羊膜穿刺术后可能的危险因素对胎儿脱胎率的影响。设计回顾性分析1993 - 1998年的病例记录。设大型教学医院胎儿医学单元。研究小组由1606名单胎妊娠妇女组成。其中778人在手术前有过妊娠出血史,298人有过三次或三次以上妊娠早期流产和/或妊娠中期流产或终止妊娠史。42424名接受羊膜穿刺术且无危险因素的女性作为对照。两组还根据母亲的年龄进行了分类。第一组:1610名女性,年龄20-34岁;第二组:2850名女性,年龄35-39岁;组3;570名妇女>40年。方法两组妇女均于妊娠16 ~ 21周行中期羊膜穿刺术。在三个时间间隔检查羊膜穿刺术后胎儿损失:1。手术后两周内;2. 至第28周;3.从28周到足月。结果20 ~ 34岁产妇的胎儿丢失率(2.54%)与35 ~ 34岁产妇的胎儿丢失率(2.54%)有统计学差异。40年(5.1%)。妊娠期间有阴道出血史的妇女与对照组相比,胎儿丢失率更高(6.5% vs 2.8%),优势比为2.4 (95% CI 1.69-3.42)。在有堕胎/终止妊娠史的妇女组和对照组之间发现了类似的差异(8% vs 2.8%): OR 3.03 (95% CI 1.92-4.79)。结论女性羊膜穿刺术后胎儿丢失的风险较高;40岁与20-34岁的人相比。妊娠出血、三次或三次以上妊娠早期流产史、妊娠中期流产或终止妊娠似乎是羊膜穿刺术后胎儿丢失的重要易感因素。