Evaluation of Perivascular Adhesion Formation in New Zealand White Rabbits Using Oxiplex and DuraSeal Xact Adhesion Barrier System

Fred Mo MD , James Yue MD , Jianghui Zhang MD , Kreg Howk MS , Allister Williams MD
{"title":"Evaluation of Perivascular Adhesion Formation in New Zealand White Rabbits Using Oxiplex and DuraSeal Xact Adhesion Barrier System","authors":"Fred Mo MD ,&nbsp;James Yue MD ,&nbsp;Jianghui Zhang MD ,&nbsp;Kreg Howk MS ,&nbsp;Allister Williams MD","doi":"10.1016/S1935-9810(09)70009-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Adhesion formation after spine surgery is a result of normal wound healing that may place patients at increased risk for complications during revision surgery. Preventing adhesions could reduce the risk of complications during revision surgery, and possibly reduce the need for revision procedures. This study evaluates the ability of DuraSeal Xact Adhesion Barrier System (DSX) (Covidien, Mansfield, Massachusetts) and Oxiplex/SP gel (OX) (FzioMed, San Luis Obispo, California) to affect the extent and severity of postoperative perivascular adhesion development in an anterior spinal surgical rabbit model.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We determined the extent and severity of postoperative adhesion development 34 days after surgery in 12 male New Zealand White rabbits randomly assigned to intraoperative treatment with either DSX or OX, or to an untreated control group. Adhesion severity and extent were scored on scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The extent and severity of adhesions in the DSX group were significantly less than in the untreated control group. The DSX group mean extent score was 1.3<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.5 (vs 2.5, P<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.01) and the mean severity score was 1.25<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.5 (vs 2.8, P<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.005). The extent and severity of adhesions in the OX group were not significantly different from the control group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In this study, we found DSX to be the most effective compound in preventing adhesion formation after anterior spine surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Relevance</h3><p>Extrapolating these results in rabbits to humans, less scarring between the major blood vessels could decrease the rate of complications in revision spine procedures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":88695,"journal":{"name":"SAS journal","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 68-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1935-9810(09)70009-X","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193598100970009X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Adhesion formation after spine surgery is a result of normal wound healing that may place patients at increased risk for complications during revision surgery. Preventing adhesions could reduce the risk of complications during revision surgery, and possibly reduce the need for revision procedures. This study evaluates the ability of DuraSeal Xact Adhesion Barrier System (DSX) (Covidien, Mansfield, Massachusetts) and Oxiplex/SP gel (OX) (FzioMed, San Luis Obispo, California) to affect the extent and severity of postoperative perivascular adhesion development in an anterior spinal surgical rabbit model.

Methods

We determined the extent and severity of postoperative adhesion development 34 days after surgery in 12 male New Zealand White rabbits randomly assigned to intraoperative treatment with either DSX or OX, or to an untreated control group. Adhesion severity and extent were scored on scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).

Results

The extent and severity of adhesions in the DSX group were significantly less than in the untreated control group. The DSX group mean extent score was 1.3 ± 0.5 (vs 2.5, P = .01) and the mean severity score was 1.25 ± 0.5 (vs 2.8, P = .005). The extent and severity of adhesions in the OX group were not significantly different from the control group.

Conclusion

In this study, we found DSX to be the most effective compound in preventing adhesion formation after anterior spine surgery.

Clinical Relevance

Extrapolating these results in rabbits to humans, less scarring between the major blood vessels could decrease the rate of complications in revision spine procedures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用oxplex和DuraSeal精确粘连屏障系统评价新西兰大白兔血管周围粘连形成
脊柱手术后粘连的形成是伤口正常愈合的结果,这可能使患者在翻修手术中出现并发症的风险增加。预防粘连可以减少翻修手术中并发症的风险,并可能减少翻修手术的需要。本研究评估DuraSeal Xact粘连屏障系统(DSX) (Covidien, Mansfield, Massachusetts)和oxplex /SP凝胶(OX) (FzioMed, San Luis Obispo, California)在兔脊柱前路手术模型中影响术后血管周围粘连发展的程度和严重程度的能力。方法对12只雄性新西兰大白兔进行术后34天粘连程度和严重程度的测定,这些雄性新西兰大白兔被随机分为术中给予DSX或OX治疗组和未给予治疗的对照组。粘附严重程度和程度评分从0(无)到3(严重)。结果DSX组的粘连程度和严重程度均明显小于未治疗对照组。DSX组平均程度评分为1.3±0.5 (vs 2.5, P = 0.01),平均严重程度评分为1.25±0.5 (vs 2.8, P = 0.005)。OX组的粘连程度和严重程度与对照组无显著差异。结论在本研究中,我们发现DSX是预防脊柱前路手术后粘连形成最有效的化合物。临床相关性将这些结果从兔子到人类进行推断,减少主要血管之间的疤痕可以降低脊柱翻修手术的并发症发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preclinical and clinical experience with a viscoelastic total disc replacement Kineflex lumbar artificial disc versus Charité lumbar total disc replacement for the treatment of degenerative disc disease: A randomized non-inferiority trial with minimum of 2 years' follow-up Vertebral augmentation treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures with the Kiva VCF Treatment System Effects of preoperative education on spinal surgery patients An attempt at clinically defining and assessing minimally invasive surgery compared with traditional “open” spinal surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1