Operative intervention in delivery is associated with compromised early mother-infant interaction

Heather J Rowe-Murray, Jane R.W Fisher
{"title":"Operative intervention in delivery is associated with compromised early mother-infant interaction","authors":"Heather J Rowe-Murray,&nbsp;Jane R.W Fisher","doi":"10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00242-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Objective</strong> To investigate the effects of mode and place of delivery on first mother–infant contact and maternal emotional wellbeing.</p><p><strong>Design</strong> A prospective, longitudinal study.</p><p><strong>Participants</strong> A sociodemographically representative sample of 203 consecutive primiparous women was recruited, of whom 81% (<em>n</em>=164) were followed up.</p><p><strong>Setting</strong> Four metropolitan hospitals, including one accredited baby friendly hospital, in Melbourne, Australia, 1997.</p><p><strong>Methods</strong> During the postnatal hospital stay women were interviewed and medical records were inspected. Participants completed two self-report psychometric measures: the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Profile of Moods States (POMS). Follow up at eight months postpartum comprised completion of a postal questionnaire and repeat administration of the standardised self-report psychometric mood questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results</strong> The First Contact Index provides a measure of the first contact between a mother and her baby after the birth. Two-way analysis of variance revealed significant differences in First Contact Index between three modes of delivery groups: spontaneous, instrumentally-assisted, and caesarean section (<em>P</em>&lt;0.001) and four hospital of delivery groups (<em>P</em>&lt;0.001), but there was no significant interaction effect (<em>P</em>=0.55). Significant negative correlations existed between the First Contact Index and both the POMS and EPDS scores at two days postpartum (POMS, r = -0.339, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.22; EPDS, r = -0.279, 95% CI -0.41 to -0.16), even within delivery groups, and these were still present at eight months postpartum (POMS, r = -0.298, 95% CI -0.44 to -0.14, EPDS, r = -0.206, 95% CI -0.36 to -0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong> Instrumental and surgical delivery exert a negative impact on first postnatal contact between a mother and her baby which has persistent adverse maternal emotional correlates. Hospital practices associated with obstetric intervention in delivery also varied and are amenable to change, enabling optimal first mother–baby interaction regardless of mode of delivery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75620,"journal":{"name":"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology","volume":"108 10","pages":"Pages 1068-1075"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00242-X","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030654560100242X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effects of mode and place of delivery on first mother–infant contact and maternal emotional wellbeing.

Design A prospective, longitudinal study.

Participants A sociodemographically representative sample of 203 consecutive primiparous women was recruited, of whom 81% (n=164) were followed up.

Setting Four metropolitan hospitals, including one accredited baby friendly hospital, in Melbourne, Australia, 1997.

Methods During the postnatal hospital stay women were interviewed and medical records were inspected. Participants completed two self-report psychometric measures: the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the Profile of Moods States (POMS). Follow up at eight months postpartum comprised completion of a postal questionnaire and repeat administration of the standardised self-report psychometric mood questionnaires.

Results The First Contact Index provides a measure of the first contact between a mother and her baby after the birth. Two-way analysis of variance revealed significant differences in First Contact Index between three modes of delivery groups: spontaneous, instrumentally-assisted, and caesarean section (P<0.001) and four hospital of delivery groups (P<0.001), but there was no significant interaction effect (P=0.55). Significant negative correlations existed between the First Contact Index and both the POMS and EPDS scores at two days postpartum (POMS, r = -0.339, 95% CI -0.46 to -0.22; EPDS, r = -0.279, 95% CI -0.41 to -0.16), even within delivery groups, and these were still present at eight months postpartum (POMS, r = -0.298, 95% CI -0.44 to -0.14, EPDS, r = -0.206, 95% CI -0.36 to -0.03).

Conclusion Instrumental and surgical delivery exert a negative impact on first postnatal contact between a mother and her baby which has persistent adverse maternal emotional correlates. Hospital practices associated with obstetric intervention in delivery also varied and are amenable to change, enabling optimal first mother–baby interaction regardless of mode of delivery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分娩手术干预与早期母婴互动受损有关
目的探讨分娩方式和地点对母婴初次接触及产妇情绪幸福感的影响。前瞻性、纵向研究。招募了具有社会人口学代表性的203名连续初产妇女,其中81% (n=164)进行了随访。1997年,在澳大利亚墨尔本设立了四家大都市医院,其中包括一家经认可的爱婴医院。方法对产后住院妇女进行访谈并查阅病历。参与者完成了两项自我报告心理测量:爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)和情绪状态概况(POMS)。产后8个月的随访包括完成邮寄问卷和重复管理标准化自我报告心理测量情绪问卷。结果首次接触指数提供了母亲与婴儿出生后第一次接触的衡量标准。双向方差分析显示,自然、辅助和剖宫产三种分娩方式组(P<0.001)与四种医院分娩方式组(P<0.001)的首次接触指数存在显著差异,但无显著交互效应(P=0.55)。产后2 d的首次接触指数与POMS和EPDS评分均存在显著负相关(POMS, r = -0.339, 95% CI -0.46 ~ -0.22;EPDS, r = -0.279, 95% CI -0.41至-0.16),即使在分娩组中也是如此,并且这些在产后8个月仍然存在(POMS, r = -0.298, 95% CI -0.44至-0.14,EPDS, r = -0.206, 95% CI -0.36至-0.03)。结论器械分娩和手术分娩对母婴产后首次接触有负面影响,存在持续的不良母亲情绪相关。与分娩中产科干预相关的医院做法也各不相同,并且可以改变,无论分娩方式如何,都可以实现最佳的首次母婴互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of the COVID pandemic on gynaecological cancer surgery - COVIDSurg gynaecological-cancer results Re: The outcome of pregnancy in women with cystic fibrosis: a UK population based descriptive study. (First comment on BJOG-20-0094.R1) Treat the patient, not the disease Prescribing antidepressants and anxiolytic medications to pregnant women: The perception of risk of foetal teratogenicity amongst Australian specialists and trainees The impact of maternal characteristics on acquisition of placental volume images and vascularisation indices in high risk pregnancies in the first trimester.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1