Tumor markers of lung cancer: carcinoembryonic antigen and TuMark.

P C Yang, K T Luh, Y C Lee, S H Kuo, T W Huang
{"title":"Tumor markers of lung cancer: carcinoembryonic antigen and TuMark.","authors":"P C Yang,&nbsp;K T Luh,&nbsp;Y C Lee,&nbsp;S H Kuo,&nbsp;T W Huang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess the value of tumor marker determinations in diagnosing lung cancer and monitoring the response to therapy in lung cancer patients, we tested the serum concentration of TuMark-reactive protein and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in 78 patients with lung cancer and 81 patients with non-malignant diseases. The sensitivity of TuMark in detecting the presence of lung cancer was 63.8%, compared to 37.2% for CEA (p less than 0.05). The specificity was 91.3% for TuMark and 97.5% for CEA. The combination of TuMark and CEA increased the sensitivity to 74.3%. The sensitivity of TuMark for non-small cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that for small cell carcinoma (67.6% vs 30.0%) (p less than 0.05). The incidence of positive TuMark reactivity did not correlate with the stages of lung cancer. Since the incidence of positive CEA reactivity was lower in the limited stage than in the extensive stage of lung cancer (20.0% vs 43.1%), the sensitivity of TuMark with regard to the detection of early stage lung cancer appeared far superior to CEA (65.0% vs 20.0%, p less than 0.05). Serial monitoring of TuMark levels in 32 patients with all types of lung cancer showed that 84% correlated with their clinical courses. Six patients with stage I or II disease received complete surgical resection of tumors. All showed a decline of the TuMark level to normal levels in 17 to 48 days (average of 32 days). These results suggested that the TuMark test may be a useful new marker for diagnosing lung cancer and monitoring response to therapy, especially for non-small cell lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":22189,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan yi xue hui za zhi. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan yi xue hui za zhi. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To assess the value of tumor marker determinations in diagnosing lung cancer and monitoring the response to therapy in lung cancer patients, we tested the serum concentration of TuMark-reactive protein and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in 78 patients with lung cancer and 81 patients with non-malignant diseases. The sensitivity of TuMark in detecting the presence of lung cancer was 63.8%, compared to 37.2% for CEA (p less than 0.05). The specificity was 91.3% for TuMark and 97.5% for CEA. The combination of TuMark and CEA increased the sensitivity to 74.3%. The sensitivity of TuMark for non-small cell carcinoma was significantly higher than that for small cell carcinoma (67.6% vs 30.0%) (p less than 0.05). The incidence of positive TuMark reactivity did not correlate with the stages of lung cancer. Since the incidence of positive CEA reactivity was lower in the limited stage than in the extensive stage of lung cancer (20.0% vs 43.1%), the sensitivity of TuMark with regard to the detection of early stage lung cancer appeared far superior to CEA (65.0% vs 20.0%, p less than 0.05). Serial monitoring of TuMark levels in 32 patients with all types of lung cancer showed that 84% correlated with their clinical courses. Six patients with stage I or II disease received complete surgical resection of tumors. All showed a decline of the TuMark level to normal levels in 17 to 48 days (average of 32 days). These results suggested that the TuMark test may be a useful new marker for diagnosing lung cancer and monitoring response to therapy, especially for non-small cell lung cancer.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺癌的肿瘤标志物:癌胚抗原和TuMark。
为了评估肿瘤标志物测定在肺癌诊断和监测肺癌患者治疗反应中的价值,我们检测了78例肺癌患者和81例非恶性疾病患者的血清tummark反应蛋白和癌胚抗原(CEA)浓度。TuMark检测肺癌的敏感性为63.8%,CEA为37.2% (p < 0.05)。TuMark的特异性为91.3%,CEA的特异性为97.5%。TuMark与CEA联合检测,灵敏度可达74.3%。TuMark对非小细胞癌的敏感性显著高于对小细胞癌的敏感性(67.6% vs 30.0%) (p < 0.05)。TuMark阳性反应的发生率与肺癌的分期无关。由于局限期CEA阳性反应率低于广泛期(20.0%比43.1%),TuMark对早期肺癌的检测灵敏度明显优于CEA(65.0%比20.0%,p < 0.05)。对32例所有类型肺癌患者的TuMark水平的连续监测显示,84%的TuMark水平与他们的临床病程相关。6例I期或II期患者接受了完全手术切除肿瘤。在17 ~ 48天(平均32天)内TuMark水平均降至正常水平。这些结果表明,TuMark测试可能是诊断肺癌和监测治疗反应的有用的新标志物,特别是对于非小细胞肺癌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rapid spectrophotometric method for quantitation of acetaminophen in serum. Apolipoproteins A-I and B in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Postoperative echocardiographic study of patients with symptomatic chronic aortic regurgitation. Cytomegalovirus retinitis treated with ganciclovir in a renal transplant recipient. Anterior pituitary functions in patients with uremia tested by stimulation with four combined hypothalamic releasing hormones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1