Injury to skeletal muscles of mice by forced lengthening during contractions.

J A Faulkner, D A Jones, J M Round
{"title":"Injury to skeletal muscles of mice by forced lengthening during contractions.","authors":"J A Faulkner,&nbsp;D A Jones,&nbsp;J M Round","doi":"10.1113/expphysiol.1989.sp003318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our purpose was to determine the amount of injury to extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and anterior tibial (ATB) muscles of mice from 1 h to 30 days following passive shortening and lengthening, shortening contractions and lengthening contractions. The shortening-lengthening cycle was of 600 ms duration and was repeated every 5 s for 30 min. Contractions were produced during either the shortening or lengthening phase with stimulation at 100 Hz for 300 ms. The amount of injury was evaluated by the decrease in the number of fibres in a cross-section of the muscle and in the maximum isometric tetanic force (Po). Passively shortened and lengthened and actively shortened EDL and ATB muscles showed no evidence of injury. At 3-5 days after lengthening contractions, EDL and ATB muscles showed an inflammatory response. At 3-5 days, the number of fibres in the cross-section of the injured EDL muscles was 65% of that of the contralateral control EDL muscle, whereas no change was observed in the number of fibres in the injured ATB muscles. By 3 days, the presence of myoblasts, myotubes and central nuclei indicated regeneration of fibres. One hour after shortening contractions, the Po of EDL and ATB muscles decreased to about 75% of the contralateral control value, but recovered completely by 3 days. In contrast, 1 h after lengthening contractions the Po of EDL and ATB muscles decreased to 52 and 40% respectively of the contralateral control value and then both recovered to about 65% within 3 h. For the ATB muscle, the Po showed a secondary decrease to 49% of the contralateral control value at 1 day and for the EDL muscle, to 47% at 3 days. Each muscle recovered gradually and by 30 days the number of fibres and the Po of the injured muscles were not significantly different from values for contralateral control muscles.</p>","PeriodicalId":77774,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly journal of experimental physiology (Cambridge, England)","volume":"74 5","pages":"661-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1113/expphysiol.1989.sp003318","citationCount":"99","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly journal of experimental physiology (Cambridge, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/expphysiol.1989.sp003318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 99

Abstract

Our purpose was to determine the amount of injury to extensor digitorum longus (EDL) and anterior tibial (ATB) muscles of mice from 1 h to 30 days following passive shortening and lengthening, shortening contractions and lengthening contractions. The shortening-lengthening cycle was of 600 ms duration and was repeated every 5 s for 30 min. Contractions were produced during either the shortening or lengthening phase with stimulation at 100 Hz for 300 ms. The amount of injury was evaluated by the decrease in the number of fibres in a cross-section of the muscle and in the maximum isometric tetanic force (Po). Passively shortened and lengthened and actively shortened EDL and ATB muscles showed no evidence of injury. At 3-5 days after lengthening contractions, EDL and ATB muscles showed an inflammatory response. At 3-5 days, the number of fibres in the cross-section of the injured EDL muscles was 65% of that of the contralateral control EDL muscle, whereas no change was observed in the number of fibres in the injured ATB muscles. By 3 days, the presence of myoblasts, myotubes and central nuclei indicated regeneration of fibres. One hour after shortening contractions, the Po of EDL and ATB muscles decreased to about 75% of the contralateral control value, but recovered completely by 3 days. In contrast, 1 h after lengthening contractions the Po of EDL and ATB muscles decreased to 52 and 40% respectively of the contralateral control value and then both recovered to about 65% within 3 h. For the ATB muscle, the Po showed a secondary decrease to 49% of the contralateral control value at 1 day and for the EDL muscle, to 47% at 3 days. Each muscle recovered gradually and by 30 days the number of fibres and the Po of the injured muscles were not significantly different from values for contralateral control muscles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
收缩时强制延长对小鼠骨骼肌的损伤。
我们的目的是确定被动缩短和延长、缩短收缩和延长收缩后1小时至30天内对小鼠指长伸肌(EDL)和胫骨前肌(ATB)的损伤程度。缩短-延长周期为600 ms,每5 s重复一次,持续30 min。在100 Hz刺激下,在缩短或延长阶段产生收缩,持续300 ms。损伤的程度是通过肌肉横截面纤维数量的减少和最大等距强直力(Po)来评估的。被动缩短和延长EDL和ATB肌肉,主动缩短EDL和ATB肌肉没有损伤的迹象。在延长收缩后3-5天,EDL和ATB肌肉出现炎症反应。在3-5天,损伤EDL肌横截面的纤维数量是对侧对照EDL肌的65%,而损伤ATB肌的纤维数量没有变化。到第3天,成肌细胞、肌管和中央核的出现表明纤维再生。收缩缩短1小时后,EDL和ATB肌Po降至对侧对照值的75%左右,但3天后完全恢复。相比之下,延长收缩1 h后,EDL和ATB肌肉的Po分别下降到对侧控制值的52%和40%,然后在3 h内恢复到65%左右。ATB肌肉的Po在第1天再次下降到对侧控制值的49%,EDL肌肉的Po在第3天下降到47%。各肌肉逐渐恢复,到30 d时,损伤肌肉的纤维数量和Po与对侧对照肌的值无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The school of Bernard Katz. London, 5 April 1989. Proceedings. Extracellular magnesium regulates acetylcholine-evoked amylase secretion and calcium mobilization in rat pancreatic acinar cells. Structure and function of the carotid body in New Zealand genetically hypertensive rats. Intracellular signalling and regulation of gastric acid secretion. Metabolism and inactivation of gastrin releasing peptide by endopeptidase-24.11 in the dog.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1