Model of motivations for engaging in polyamorous relationships

IF 1.2 Q3 Medicine Sexologies Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sexol.2022.03.003
D. Hnatkovičová, G. Bianchi
{"title":"Model of motivations for engaging in polyamorous relationships","authors":"D. Hnatkovičová,&nbsp;G. Bianchi","doi":"10.1016/j.sexol.2022.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Polyamory is a form of consensual non-monogamy (CNM) based on the belief that people can participate in and build multiple romantic and/or sexual relationships with the consent of all involved. This form of CNM relationship is increasingly visible in societies where monogamy is a prevalent norm. Research in the field of polyamory has yielded many findings regarding the multiple relational benefits of polyamory. However, there is a limited number of studies in the literature focusing specifically on why some people find polyamory more appealing than an exclusive, dyadic partner relationship. Therefore, framed within the historical context in which polyamory emerged and the associated stigmatization, this study presents a model of the psychological motivations for considering/engaging in/remaining in a polyamorous relationship in an era when monogamy and the binary nature of intimate and sexual relationships is being deconstructed. The study is based on a secondary theoretical analysis of recent psychological studies on polyamory, discussed in light of the relevant psychological theories of motivation. The result is an 8-component model of diverse potential polyamory motivations, individually or in aggregate. The motivations were organized into eight domains: fulfilment of needs not met in a monogamous relationship; personal growth and autonomy; identity development and polyamory; expression of political values; exploring minority identities (sexual fluidity and bisexuality); need to belong to a community; desire for sexual diversity; and psychodynamic reasons. This study also shows there may be diversified need of psychotherapeutic approaches for polyamorous individuals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45416,"journal":{"name":"Sexologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S115813602200024X/pdfft?md5=74d87538ff54cd9e2b91c377fd0db74d&pid=1-s2.0-S115813602200024X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S115813602200024X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polyamory is a form of consensual non-monogamy (CNM) based on the belief that people can participate in and build multiple romantic and/or sexual relationships with the consent of all involved. This form of CNM relationship is increasingly visible in societies where monogamy is a prevalent norm. Research in the field of polyamory has yielded many findings regarding the multiple relational benefits of polyamory. However, there is a limited number of studies in the literature focusing specifically on why some people find polyamory more appealing than an exclusive, dyadic partner relationship. Therefore, framed within the historical context in which polyamory emerged and the associated stigmatization, this study presents a model of the psychological motivations for considering/engaging in/remaining in a polyamorous relationship in an era when monogamy and the binary nature of intimate and sexual relationships is being deconstructed. The study is based on a secondary theoretical analysis of recent psychological studies on polyamory, discussed in light of the relevant psychological theories of motivation. The result is an 8-component model of diverse potential polyamory motivations, individually or in aggregate. The motivations were organized into eight domains: fulfilment of needs not met in a monogamous relationship; personal growth and autonomy; identity development and polyamory; expression of political values; exploring minority identities (sexual fluidity and bisexuality); need to belong to a community; desire for sexual diversity; and psychodynamic reasons. This study also shows there may be diversified need of psychotherapeutic approaches for polyamorous individuals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与多角恋关系的动机模型
一夫多妻制是一种双方同意的非一夫一妻制(CNM),它基于一种信念,即人们可以参与并建立多种浪漫和/或性关系,前提是所有参与者都同意。这种形式的CNM关系在一夫一妻制盛行的社会中越来越明显。在一夫多妻制领域的研究已经产生了许多关于一夫多妻制的多重关系利益的发现。然而,文献中有有限的研究专门关注为什么有些人觉得一夫多妻制比排他性的二元伴侣关系更有吸引力。因此,在一夫多妻制出现和相关污名化的历史背景下,本研究提出了一个在一夫一妻制和亲密关系和性关系的二元本质被解构的时代,考虑/参与/保持一夫多妻关系的心理动机模型。本研究是在对近期多角恋心理学研究进行二次理论分析的基础上,结合心理学动机的相关理论进行探讨。结果是一个由8个成分组成的模型,包含了不同的潜在一夫多妻制动机,无论是单独的还是总体的。动机被分为八个领域:满足在一夫一妻制关系中没有得到满足的需求;个人成长和自主;身份发展与多角恋;政治价值观的表达;探索少数群体身份(性流动性和双性恋);需要归属于一个群体;对性别多样性的渴望;还有心理动力学的原因。本研究也显示,对于多角恋的个体,可能有不同的心理治疗需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexologies
Sexologies PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Sexologies offers a large panel of information to all health professionals working in the field of sexuality: anatomophysiological and basic research; psychodynamic, cognitive, behavioural and relational evaluations of sexual difficulties; epidemiological, sociological, forensic data; information on new sexoactive molecules; research on sexual physiology, reports on specialized congresses; press and books reviews; ethical aspects; calendar of major events of sexology around the world.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The effect of EX-PLISST and GATHER models on sexual function with gestational diabetes Le réflexe orgasmique : un phénomène biologique dont l’établissement dépend d’une période de sensibilité Attentes concernant l’instauration d’ateliers sur la sexualité en addictologie Association between tampons and toxic shock syndrome in menstruating women: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1