Nora Hilda Chávez Hernández , Alejandro Antonio Sánchez Cruz
{"title":"Serie de casos de pacientes con hepatocarcinoma tratados con sorafenib como terapia puente a quimioembolización y finalmente como paliativo","authors":"Nora Hilda Chávez Hernández , Alejandro Antonio Sánchez Cruz","doi":"10.1016/j.gamo.2016.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There are patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who are candidates for chemoembolisation that face long delays due to waiting for the imaging assessment of that procedure by the radiologist.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To describe the results of a series of patients who received sorafenib as a bridge therapy during the time of deferral for chemoembolisation.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>An analysis was made of the records of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma that were assessed in the digestive tract neoplasms functional unit (UFNAD) from August 2015 to February 2016, in order to detect those that had been treated with sorafenib as a bridge to chemoembolisation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 14 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were evaluated in the UFNAD in this period, with 9 of them receiving sorafenib as bridge therapy. It was used as initial therapy in 7, after radiofrequency in 2. None of them received the local therapy for which the sorafenib was planned as bridge, and all for reasons other than progression.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>If chemoembolisation has to delayed, it is feasible to use sorafenib as a bridging therapy, which can also serve to avoid delay in palliative therapy if the patient turns out not to be a candidate for local therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41581,"journal":{"name":"Gaceta Mexicana de Oncologia","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 195-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gamo.2016.07.006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaceta Mexicana de Oncologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665920116300529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
There are patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who are candidates for chemoembolisation that face long delays due to waiting for the imaging assessment of that procedure by the radiologist.
Objective
To describe the results of a series of patients who received sorafenib as a bridge therapy during the time of deferral for chemoembolisation.
Material and methods
An analysis was made of the records of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma that were assessed in the digestive tract neoplasms functional unit (UFNAD) from August 2015 to February 2016, in order to detect those that had been treated with sorafenib as a bridge to chemoembolisation.
Results
A total of 14 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were evaluated in the UFNAD in this period, with 9 of them receiving sorafenib as bridge therapy. It was used as initial therapy in 7, after radiofrequency in 2. None of them received the local therapy for which the sorafenib was planned as bridge, and all for reasons other than progression.
Conclusion
If chemoembolisation has to delayed, it is feasible to use sorafenib as a bridging therapy, which can also serve to avoid delay in palliative therapy if the patient turns out not to be a candidate for local therapy.