Comparison of NCHS, CDC, and WHO curves in children with cardiovascular risk

Grasiela Junges de Oliveira , Sandra Mari Barbiero , Claudia Ciceri Cesa , Lucia Campos Pellanda
{"title":"Comparison of NCHS, CDC, and WHO curves in children with cardiovascular risk","authors":"Grasiela Junges de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Sandra Mari Barbiero ,&nbsp;Claudia Ciceri Cesa ,&nbsp;Lucia Campos Pellanda","doi":"10.1016/S2255-4823(13)70490-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The study aimed to compare the prevalence of overweight and obesity according to three growth curves, created by the World Health Organization (WHO/2006), by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS/1977), and by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC/2000) in children with cardiovascular risk factors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data from 118 children and adolescents, aged between 2 and 19 years, treated between the years 2001 to 2009 at the Pediatric Preventive Cardiology Outpatient Clinic of the Instituto de Cardiologia de Porto Alegre were evaluated. The variables analyzed were: weight, height, age, and gender. Variables were classified according to the following criteria: weight/age, height/age, and body mass index (BMI). The cutoff points used were obtained from the three growth curves: WHO/2006, NCHS/1977, and CDC/2000.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Regarding the criterion weight/age by the NCHS curve, 18% of the children were classified as having normal weight, and 82% had excess weight; by the CDC curve, 28% had normal and 72% had excess weight; by the WHO curve, 16.0% had normal weight and 84% had excess weight. According to the BMI, 0.8% of the population was underweight. 7.6% and 6.8% had normal weight; 26.3% and 11.9% were overweight; and 65.3% and 80.5% were obese, according to the CDC and WHO curves, respectively. Regarding the height/age criterion, there was no significant difference between the references and, on average, 98.3% of the population showed adequate height for age.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The new WHO curves are more sensitive to identify obesity in a population at risk, which has important implications for preventive and therapeutic management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101100,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Associa??o Médica Brasileira (English Edition)","volume":"59 4","pages":"Pages 375-380"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2255-4823(13)70490-9","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Associa??o Médica Brasileira (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255482313704909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The study aimed to compare the prevalence of overweight and obesity according to three growth curves, created by the World Health Organization (WHO/2006), by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS/1977), and by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC/2000) in children with cardiovascular risk factors.

Methods

Data from 118 children and adolescents, aged between 2 and 19 years, treated between the years 2001 to 2009 at the Pediatric Preventive Cardiology Outpatient Clinic of the Instituto de Cardiologia de Porto Alegre were evaluated. The variables analyzed were: weight, height, age, and gender. Variables were classified according to the following criteria: weight/age, height/age, and body mass index (BMI). The cutoff points used were obtained from the three growth curves: WHO/2006, NCHS/1977, and CDC/2000.

Results

Regarding the criterion weight/age by the NCHS curve, 18% of the children were classified as having normal weight, and 82% had excess weight; by the CDC curve, 28% had normal and 72% had excess weight; by the WHO curve, 16.0% had normal weight and 84% had excess weight. According to the BMI, 0.8% of the population was underweight. 7.6% and 6.8% had normal weight; 26.3% and 11.9% were overweight; and 65.3% and 80.5% were obese, according to the CDC and WHO curves, respectively. Regarding the height/age criterion, there was no significant difference between the references and, on average, 98.3% of the population showed adequate height for age.

Conclusion

The new WHO curves are more sensitive to identify obesity in a population at risk, which has important implications for preventive and therapeutic management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NCHS、CDC和WHO儿童心血管风险曲线的比较
目的:根据世界卫生组织(WHO/2006)、美国国家卫生统计中心(NCHS/1977)和美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC/2000)编制的三条生长曲线,比较具有心血管危险因素儿童的超重和肥胖患病率。方法对2001年至2009年在阿雷格里港心脏病研究所儿科预防心脏病门诊治疗的118名2 - 19岁儿童和青少年的数据进行评估。分析的变量包括:体重、身高、年龄和性别。变量根据以下标准分类:体重/年龄、身高/年龄和身体质量指数(BMI)。所使用的截止点来自三条增长曲线:WHO/2006、NCHS/1977和CDC/2000。结果在NCHS曲线的体重/年龄标准中,18%的儿童体重正常,82%的儿童体重超标;根据CDC曲线,28%的人体重正常,72%的人超重;根据WHO曲线,16.0%的人体重正常,84%的人体重超标。根据身体质量指数,有0.8%的人体重过轻。7.6%和6.8%体重正常;超重的分别为26.3%和11.9%;根据美国疾病控制与预防中心和世界卫生组织的曲线,分别有65.3%和80.5%的人肥胖。在身高/年龄标准方面,参考文献之间没有显著差异,平均有98.3%的人口身高符合年龄。结论新的WHO曲线对肥胖高危人群的识别更为敏感,对预防和治疗管理具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Doppler velocimetry of the fetal middle cerebral artery and other parameters of fetal well-being in neonatal survival during pregnancies with placental insufficiency Supplemental care from a bioethical perspective Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in women exposed to wood stove smoke Prevalence of obesity in asthma and its relations with asthma severity and control Rebound effects of modern drugs: serious adverse events unknown by health professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1