Cases

Q4 Social Sciences Environmental Law and Management Pub Date : 1999-10-18 DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0941(199907/10)11:4/5<121::AID-ELM150>3.0.CO;2-U

{"title":"Cases","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-0941(199907/10)11:4/5<121::AID-ELM150>3.0.CO;2-U","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Civil liability</h3>\n \n <p>A way open for <i>Francovitch</i> liability under the Shellfish Directive?—<i>Bowden v South West Water Services Ltd</i>.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Environmental information</h3>\n \n <p>Important principles laid down in <i>R v Secretary of State and Midland Expressway (MEL) ex p. Alliance against the Birmingham Northern Relief Road</i>.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Genetic modification</h3>\n \n <p><i>Monsanto</i> prosecuted and fined, <i>Perryfields</i> also—HSE admits a failure to comply with regulations on access to environmental information.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Planning</h3>\n \n <p><i>R v North Yorkshire County Council ex p. Brown</i>—application of environment assessment on old mineral planning permissions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Water</h3>\n \n <p>Massive fine for coastal pollution—<i>Agency v Milford Haven Port Authority</i>. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":39650,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Law and Management","volume":"11 4-5","pages":"121-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Law and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-0941%28199907/10%2911%3A4/5%3C121%3A%3AAID-ELM150%3E3.0.CO%3B2-U","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Civil liability

A way open for Francovitch liability under the Shellfish Directive?—Bowden v South West Water Services Ltd.

Environmental information

Important principles laid down in R v Secretary of State and Midland Expressway (MEL) ex p. Alliance against the Birmingham Northern Relief Road.

Genetic modification

Monsanto prosecuted and fined, Perryfields also—HSE admits a failure to comply with regulations on access to environmental information.

Planning

R v North Yorkshire County Council ex p. Brown—application of environment assessment on old mineral planning permissions.

Water

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

情况下

民事责任:贝类指令下Francovitch责任的出路?-鲍登诉西南水务有限公司环境信息在R诉国务卿和米德兰高速公路(MEL)案中规定的重要原则，不包括联盟反对伯明翰北部救济公路。孟山都公司被起诉并被罚款，Perryfields也承认未能遵守有关获取环境信息的规定。规划R诉北约克郡议会，除p. brown外——对旧矿产规划许可进行环境评估的申请。对海岸污染的巨额罚款-机构诉米尔福德港港务局。版权所有©1999 John Wiley &儿子,有限公司

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Environmental Law and Management Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The aim of Environmental Law & Management is to provide lawyers, and other concerned professionals such as environmental consultants and managers in commerce and industry, with a coverage of rapidly developing issues in Environmental Law that is both contemporaneous and authoritative, combining the approaches of reporting developments and ensuring they are analysed so that their implications may be assessed. The objectives which the journal seeks to pursue in this connection are to provide accurate and up to date reports of recent developments in case law, statute and policy, and to reinforce this with in-depth analysis in the form of both articles and shorter items.