Swimming training for asthma in children and adolescents aged 18 years and under

Sean Beggs, Yi Chao Foong, Hong Cecilia T Le, Danial Noor, Richard Wood-Baker, Julia AE Walters
{"title":"Swimming training for asthma in children and adolescents aged 18 years and under","authors":"Sean Beggs,&nbsp;Yi Chao Foong,&nbsp;Hong Cecilia T Le,&nbsp;Danial Noor,&nbsp;Richard Wood-Baker,&nbsp;Julia AE Walters","doi":"10.1002/ebch.1935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Asthma is the most common chronic medical condition in children and a common reason for hospitalisation. Observational studies have suggested that swimming, in particular, is an ideal form of physical activity to improve fitness and decrease the burden of disease in asthma.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To determine the effectiveness and safety of swimming training as an intervention for asthma in children and adolescents aged 18 years and under.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Search methods</h3>\n \n <p>We searched the Cochrane Airways Group's Specialised Register of trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE , EMBASE, CINAHL, in November 2011, and repeated the search of CENTRAL in July 2012. We also handsearched ongoing Clinical Trials Registers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Selection criteria</h3>\n \n <p>We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of children and adolescents comparing swimming training with usual care, a non-physical activity, or physical activity other than swimming.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data collection and analysis</h3>\n \n <p>We used standard methods specified in the <i>Cochrane Handbook for Systematic reviews of Interventions</i>. Two review authors used a standard template to independently assess trials for inclusion and extract data on study characteristics, risk of bias elements and outcomes. We contacted trial authors to request data if not published fully. When required, we calculated correlation coefficients from studies with full outcome data to impute standard deviation of changes from baseline.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main results</h3>\n \n <p>Eight studies involving 262 participants were included in the review. Participants had stable asthma, with severity ranging from mild to severe. All studies were randomised trials, three studies had high withdrawal rates. Participants were between five to 18 years of age, and in seven studies swimming training varied from 30 to 90 minutes, two to three times a week, over six to 12 weeks. The programme in one study gave 30 minutes training six times per week. The comparison was usual care in seven studies and golf in one study. Chlorination status of swimming pool was unknown for four studies. Two studies used non-chlorinated pools, one study used an indoor chlorinated pool and one study used a chlorinated but well-ventilated pool.</p>\n \n <p>No statistically significant effects were seen in studies comparing swimming training with usual care or another physical activity for the primary outcomes; quality of life, asthma control, asthma exacerbations or use of corticosteroids for asthma. Swimming training had a clinically meaningful effect on exercise capacity compared with usual care, measured as maximal oxygen consumption during a maximum effort exercise test (VO2 max) (two studies, n = 32), with a mean increase of 9.67 mL/kg/min; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.84 to 13.51. A difference of equivalent magnitude was found when other measures of exercise capacity were also pooled (four studies, n = 74), giving a standardised mean difference (SMD) 1.34; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.86. Swimming training was associated with small increases in resting lung function parameters of varying statistical significance; mean difference (MD) for FEV1 % predicted 8.07; 95% CI 3.59 to 12.54. In sensitivity analyses, by risk of attrition bias or use of imputed standard deviations, there were no important changes on effect sizes. Unknown chlorination status of pools limited subgroup analyses.</p>\n \n <p>Based on limited data, there were no adverse effects on asthma control or occurrence of exacerbations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Authors' conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This review indicates that swimming training is well-tolerated in children and adolescents with stable asthma, and increases lung function (moderate strength evidence) and cardio-pulmonary fitness (high strength evidence). There was no evidence that swimming training caused adverse effects on asthma control in young people 18 years and under with stable asthma of any severity. However whether swimming is better than other forms of physical activity cannot be determined from this review. Further adequately powered trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to better assess the long-term benefits of swimming.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\n \n <p><b>Swimming training for asthma in children and adolescents aged 18 years and under</b></p>\n \n <p>Asthma is a common condition among children and adolescents causing intermittent wheezing, coughing and chest tightness. Concerns that physical exercise, such as swimming, can worsen asthma may reduce participation, and result in reduced physical fitness. This review aimed to determine the  effectiveness and safety of swimming training in children and adolescents with asthma who are aged 18 years and under.</p>\n \n <p>We reviewed a total of eight studies involving 262 participants between the ages of five and 18 years with well-controlled asthma. They underwent swimming training varying from 30 to 90 minutes two to three times a week over six to 12 weeks in seven studies, and in one study training lasted 30 minutes six times per week.</p>\n \n <p>This review found that for swimming training compared to control (either usual care or another physical activity), there were improvements in resting lung function tests, but no effects were found on quality of life, control of asthma symptoms or asthma exacerbations. Physical fitness increased with swimming training compared with usual care. There were few reported adverse asthmatic events in swimming training participants during the programmes. The relatively small number of studies and participants limits this review's ability to measure some outcomes that are of interest, particularly the impact on quality of life and  asthma exacerbations.</p>\n \n <p>In summary, swimming training is well-tolerated in children and adolescents with stable asthma, and increases physical fitness and lung function. However, whether swimming is better and/or safer than other forms of physical activity cannot be determined from this review. Further studies with longer follow-up periods may help us understand any long-term benefits of swimming.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12162,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ebch.1935","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based child health : a Cochrane review journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ebch.1935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Asthma is the most common chronic medical condition in children and a common reason for hospitalisation. Observational studies have suggested that swimming, in particular, is an ideal form of physical activity to improve fitness and decrease the burden of disease in asthma.

Objectives

To determine the effectiveness and safety of swimming training as an intervention for asthma in children and adolescents aged 18 years and under.

Search methods

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group's Specialised Register of trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE , EMBASE, CINAHL, in November 2011, and repeated the search of CENTRAL in July 2012. We also handsearched ongoing Clinical Trials Registers.

Selection criteria

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of children and adolescents comparing swimming training with usual care, a non-physical activity, or physical activity other than swimming.

Data collection and analysis

We used standard methods specified in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic reviews of Interventions. Two review authors used a standard template to independently assess trials for inclusion and extract data on study characteristics, risk of bias elements and outcomes. We contacted trial authors to request data if not published fully. When required, we calculated correlation coefficients from studies with full outcome data to impute standard deviation of changes from baseline.

Main results

Eight studies involving 262 participants were included in the review. Participants had stable asthma, with severity ranging from mild to severe. All studies were randomised trials, three studies had high withdrawal rates. Participants were between five to 18 years of age, and in seven studies swimming training varied from 30 to 90 minutes, two to three times a week, over six to 12 weeks. The programme in one study gave 30 minutes training six times per week. The comparison was usual care in seven studies and golf in one study. Chlorination status of swimming pool was unknown for four studies. Two studies used non-chlorinated pools, one study used an indoor chlorinated pool and one study used a chlorinated but well-ventilated pool.

No statistically significant effects were seen in studies comparing swimming training with usual care or another physical activity for the primary outcomes; quality of life, asthma control, asthma exacerbations or use of corticosteroids for asthma. Swimming training had a clinically meaningful effect on exercise capacity compared with usual care, measured as maximal oxygen consumption during a maximum effort exercise test (VO2 max) (two studies, n = 32), with a mean increase of 9.67 mL/kg/min; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.84 to 13.51. A difference of equivalent magnitude was found when other measures of exercise capacity were also pooled (four studies, n = 74), giving a standardised mean difference (SMD) 1.34; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.86. Swimming training was associated with small increases in resting lung function parameters of varying statistical significance; mean difference (MD) for FEV1 % predicted 8.07; 95% CI 3.59 to 12.54. In sensitivity analyses, by risk of attrition bias or use of imputed standard deviations, there were no important changes on effect sizes. Unknown chlorination status of pools limited subgroup analyses.

Based on limited data, there were no adverse effects on asthma control or occurrence of exacerbations.

Authors' conclusions

This review indicates that swimming training is well-tolerated in children and adolescents with stable asthma, and increases lung function (moderate strength evidence) and cardio-pulmonary fitness (high strength evidence). There was no evidence that swimming training caused adverse effects on asthma control in young people 18 years and under with stable asthma of any severity. However whether swimming is better than other forms of physical activity cannot be determined from this review. Further adequately powered trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to better assess the long-term benefits of swimming.

Plain Language Summary

Swimming training for asthma in children and adolescents aged 18 years and under

Asthma is a common condition among children and adolescents causing intermittent wheezing, coughing and chest tightness. Concerns that physical exercise, such as swimming, can worsen asthma may reduce participation, and result in reduced physical fitness. This review aimed to determine the  effectiveness and safety of swimming training in children and adolescents with asthma who are aged 18 years and under.

We reviewed a total of eight studies involving 262 participants between the ages of five and 18 years with well-controlled asthma. They underwent swimming training varying from 30 to 90 minutes two to three times a week over six to 12 weeks in seven studies, and in one study training lasted 30 minutes six times per week.

This review found that for swimming training compared to control (either usual care or another physical activity), there were improvements in resting lung function tests, but no effects were found on quality of life, control of asthma symptoms or asthma exacerbations. Physical fitness increased with swimming training compared with usual care. There were few reported adverse asthmatic events in swimming training participants during the programmes. The relatively small number of studies and participants limits this review's ability to measure some outcomes that are of interest, particularly the impact on quality of life and  asthma exacerbations.

In summary, swimming training is well-tolerated in children and adolescents with stable asthma, and increases physical fitness and lung function. However, whether swimming is better and/or safer than other forms of physical activity cannot be determined from this review. Further studies with longer follow-up periods may help us understand any long-term benefits of swimming.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
18岁及以下儿童和青少年哮喘的游泳训练
哮喘是儿童最常见的慢性疾病,也是住院治疗的常见原因。观察性研究表明,特别是游泳,是一种理想的体育活动形式,可以改善健康,减少哮喘疾病的负担。目的探讨游泳训练干预18岁及以下儿童和青少年哮喘的有效性和安全性。检索方法我们于2011年11月检索了Cochrane Airways Group的specialized Register of trials (CENTRAL)、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL,并于2012年7月重复检索CENTRAL。我们还手工检索了正在进行的临床试验注册。我们纳入了所有儿童和青少年的随机对照试验(rct)和准rct,将游泳训练与常规护理、非体育活动或游泳以外的体育活动进行比较。我们使用Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册中规定的标准方法。两位综述作者使用标准模板独立评估纳入试验并提取有关研究特征、偏倚风险因素和结果的数据。我们联系了试验作者,要求他们提供未完全发表的数据。当需要时,我们从具有完整结果数据的研究中计算相关系数,以估算基线变化的标准差。主要结果纳入8项研究,共262名受试者。参与者有稳定的哮喘,严重程度从轻微到严重不等。所有研究均为随机试验,其中3项研究有高戒断率。参与者年龄在5到18岁之间,在7项研究中,游泳训练时间从30到90分钟不等,每周2到3次,持续6到12周。在一项研究中,该计划每周进行6次30分钟的训练。七项研究中的常规护理和一项研究中的高尔夫球进行了比较。游泳池的氯化状况在四项研究中是未知的。两项研究使用了不含氯的游泳池,一项研究使用了室内含氯游泳池,另一项研究使用了含氯但通风良好的游泳池。在比较游泳训练与日常护理或其他体育活动对主要结果的研究中,没有发现统计学上显著的影响;生活质量、哮喘控制、哮喘加重或使用皮质类固醇治疗哮喘。与常规训练相比,游泳训练对运动能力有临床意义的影响,以最大努力运动试验(VO2 max)中的最大耗氧量来衡量(两项研究,n = 32),平均增加9.67 mL/kg/min;95%置信区间(CI) 5.84 ~ 13.51。当其他运动能力的测量也被合并(4项研究,n = 74)时,发现了等量的差异,给出了标准化平均差异(SMD) 1.34;95% CI 0.82 ~ 1.86。游泳训练与静息肺功能参数的小幅增加相关,但差异有统计学意义;平均差值(MD)预测为8.07;95% CI 3.59至12.54。在敏感性分析中,通过消耗偏差的风险或使用估算的标准偏差,效应量没有重大变化。未知池氯化状态有限亚群分析。基于有限的数据,对哮喘控制或急性发作没有不良影响。本综述表明,游泳训练在患有稳定哮喘的儿童和青少年中具有良好的耐受性,并且可以增加肺功能(中等强度证据)和心肺健康(高强度证据)。没有证据表明游泳训练对18岁及18岁以下患有任何严重程度的稳定哮喘的年轻人的哮喘控制产生不利影响。然而,游泳是否比其他形式的体育活动更好还不能从这篇综述中确定。为了更好地评估游泳的长期益处,需要进一步的、有充分动力的、随访时间更长的试验。18岁及患有哮喘的儿童和青少年的哮喘游泳训练是儿童和青少年中引起间歇性喘息、咳嗽和胸闷的常见疾病。 担心体育锻炼,如游泳,会加重哮喘,可能会减少参与,并导致身体健康下降。本综述旨在确定游泳训练对18岁及以下哮喘儿童和青少年的有效性和安全性。我们总共回顾了8项研究,涉及262名年龄在5至18岁之间、哮喘控制良好的参与者。在七项研究中,他们在六到十二周的时间里,每周进行两到三次30到90分钟不等的游泳训练,在一项研究中,每周进行六次30分钟的训练。本综述发现,与对照组(常规护理或其他体育活动)相比,游泳训练在静息肺功能测试中有改善,但在生活质量、哮喘症状控制或哮喘恶化方面没有发现影响。与常规护理相比,游泳训练提高了身体素质。在游泳训练期间,很少有不良哮喘事件的报道。相对较少的研究和参与者限制了本综述测量一些感兴趣的结果的能力,特别是对生活质量和哮喘恶化的影响。总之,游泳训练在患有稳定哮喘的儿童和青少年中具有良好的耐受性,并能增强体质和肺功能。然而,游泳是否比其他形式的体育活动更好和/或更安全并不能从这篇综述中确定。更长期的后续研究可以帮助我们了解游泳的长期好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials Pros and cons … Formoterol or salmeterol for asthma—should they be used as monotherapy? Interventions for treating femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1