Establishing combination PAC-1 and TRAIL regimens for treating ovarian cancer based on patient-specific pharmacokinetic profiles using in silico clinical trials

Olivia Cardinal, Chloé Burlot, Yangxin Fu, Powel Crosley, Mary Hitt, Morgan Craig, Adrianne L. Jenner
{"title":"Establishing combination PAC-1 and TRAIL regimens for treating ovarian cancer based on patient-specific pharmacokinetic profiles using in silico clinical trials","authors":"Olivia Cardinal,&nbsp;Chloé Burlot,&nbsp;Yangxin Fu,&nbsp;Powel Crosley,&nbsp;Mary Hitt,&nbsp;Morgan Craig,&nbsp;Adrianne L. Jenner","doi":"10.1002/cso2.1035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ovarian cancer is commonly diagnosed in its late stages, and new treatment modalities are needed to improve patient outcomes and survival. We have recently established the synergistic effects of combination tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and procaspase activating compound (PAC-1) therapies in granulosa cell tumors (GCT) of the ovary, a rare form of ovarian cancer, using a mathematical model of the effects of both drugs in a GCT cell line. Here, to understand the mechanisms of combined TRAIL and PAC-1 therapy, study the viability of this treatment strategy, and accelerate preclinical translation, we leveraged our mathematical model in combination with population pharmacokinetics (PKs) models of both TRAIL and PAC-1 to expand a realistic heterogeneous cohort of virtual patients and optimize treatment schedules. Using this approach, we investigated treatment responses in this virtual cohort and determined optimal therapeutic schedules based on patient-specific PK characteristics. Our results showed that schedules with high initial doses of PAC-1 were required for therapeutic efficacy. Further analysis of individualized regimens revealed two distinct groups of virtual patients within our cohort: one with high PAC-1 elimination and one with normal PAC-1 elimination. In the high elimination group, high weekly doses of both PAC-1 and TRAIL were necessary for therapeutic efficacy; however, virtual patients in this group were predicted to have a worse prognosis when compared to those in the normal elimination group. Thus, PAC-1 PK characteristics, particularly clearance, can be used to identify patients most likely to respond to combined PAC-1 and TRAIL therapy. This work underlines the importance of quantitative approaches in preclinical oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":72658,"journal":{"name":"Computational and systems oncology","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cso2.1035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational and systems oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cso2.1035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is commonly diagnosed in its late stages, and new treatment modalities are needed to improve patient outcomes and survival. We have recently established the synergistic effects of combination tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and procaspase activating compound (PAC-1) therapies in granulosa cell tumors (GCT) of the ovary, a rare form of ovarian cancer, using a mathematical model of the effects of both drugs in a GCT cell line. Here, to understand the mechanisms of combined TRAIL and PAC-1 therapy, study the viability of this treatment strategy, and accelerate preclinical translation, we leveraged our mathematical model in combination with population pharmacokinetics (PKs) models of both TRAIL and PAC-1 to expand a realistic heterogeneous cohort of virtual patients and optimize treatment schedules. Using this approach, we investigated treatment responses in this virtual cohort and determined optimal therapeutic schedules based on patient-specific PK characteristics. Our results showed that schedules with high initial doses of PAC-1 were required for therapeutic efficacy. Further analysis of individualized regimens revealed two distinct groups of virtual patients within our cohort: one with high PAC-1 elimination and one with normal PAC-1 elimination. In the high elimination group, high weekly doses of both PAC-1 and TRAIL were necessary for therapeutic efficacy; however, virtual patients in this group were predicted to have a worse prognosis when compared to those in the normal elimination group. Thus, PAC-1 PK characteristics, particularly clearance, can be used to identify patients most likely to respond to combined PAC-1 and TRAIL therapy. This work underlines the importance of quantitative approaches in preclinical oncology.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于计算机临床试验的患者特异性药代动力学特征,建立PAC-1和TRAIL联合治疗卵巢癌的方案
卵巢癌通常在晚期被诊断出来,需要新的治疗方式来改善患者的预后和生存率。我们最近建立了肿瘤坏死因子相关凋亡诱导配体(TRAIL)和原aspase激活化合物(PAC-1)联合治疗卵巢颗粒细胞瘤(GCT)的协同作用,这是一种罕见的卵巢癌,使用两种药物在GCT细胞系中的作用的数学模型。在这里,为了了解TRAIL和PAC-1联合治疗的机制,研究这种治疗策略的可行性,并加速临床前转化,我们利用我们的数学模型结合TRAIL和PAC-1的群体药代动力学(PKs)模型来扩大虚拟患者的现实异质队列并优化治疗计划。使用这种方法,我们在这个虚拟队列中调查了治疗反应,并根据患者特定的PK特征确定了最佳治疗方案。我们的研究结果表明,高初始剂量的PAC-1计划是治疗效果所必需的。对个体化治疗方案的进一步分析显示,在我们的队列中有两组不同的虚拟患者:一组PAC-1消除率高,一组PAC-1消除率正常。在高消除组,高剂量的PAC-1和TRAIL是治疗效果所必需的;然而,与正常消除组相比,该组的虚拟患者预计预后更差。因此,PAC-1 PK特征,特别是清除率,可用于识别最有可能对PAC-1和TRAIL联合治疗有反应的患者。这项工作强调了定量方法在临床前肿瘤学中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unraveling the dangerous duet between cancer cell plasticity and drug resistance Issue Information Generative adversarial networks applied to gene expression analysis: An interdisciplinary perspective Issue Information Role of heterogeneity in dictating tumorigenesis in epithelial tissues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1