Improving bermudagrass in the Southeastern United States with alfalfa as an alternative nitrogen source in grazing systems

Justin C. Burt, Lisa L. Baxter, Christopher G. Prevatt, Mary Kimberly Mullenix, R. Lawton Stewart Jr., Jennifer J. Tucker
{"title":"Improving bermudagrass in the Southeastern United States with alfalfa as an alternative nitrogen source in grazing systems","authors":"Justin C. Burt,&nbsp;Lisa L. Baxter,&nbsp;Christopher G. Prevatt,&nbsp;Mary Kimberly Mullenix,&nbsp;R. Lawton Stewart Jr.,&nbsp;Jennifer J. Tucker","doi":"10.1002/glr2.12038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Bermudagrass (<i>Cynodon</i> spp.) is one of the most common perennial warm-season forages grown in the Southeastern United States. The incorporation of alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i>) into bermudagrass pastures could serve as an alternative source of nitrogen (N) while also improving the nutritive value of the forage base.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A 2-year grazing evaluation arranged in a randomized complete block design was conducted from May to September 2018 (Year 1) and May–August 2019 (Year 2) in Tifton, GA, USA. The objective was to compare the production of alfalfa–bermudagrass mixed pastures (BGA) with bermudagrass monoculture pastures with (BGN) or without (BG) the application of synthetic nitrogen on forage production and stocker cattle performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Differences were observed for average daily gain (<i>p</i> = 0.10), gain per hectare (<i>p</i> = 0.02) and stocking rate (<i>p</i> = 0.01), in that BGA was greatest compared to BGN and BG, which did not differ from each other. Furthermore, BGA had increased forage crude protein (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and total digestible nutrients (<i>p</i> = 0.01) compared to BGN and BG. Finally, BGA provided the greatest economic return per hectare compared to BG or BGN.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These data illustrate improved animal performance and forage nutritive value using alfalfa–bermudagrass systems and offer a viable option for producers seeking alternatives to synthetic N sources for bermudagrass pastures in the Southeastern United States.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100593,"journal":{"name":"Grassland Research","volume":"1 4","pages":"280-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/glr2.12038","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grassland Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/glr2.12038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) is one of the most common perennial warm-season forages grown in the Southeastern United States. The incorporation of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) into bermudagrass pastures could serve as an alternative source of nitrogen (N) while also improving the nutritive value of the forage base.

Methods

A 2-year grazing evaluation arranged in a randomized complete block design was conducted from May to September 2018 (Year 1) and May–August 2019 (Year 2) in Tifton, GA, USA. The objective was to compare the production of alfalfa–bermudagrass mixed pastures (BGA) with bermudagrass monoculture pastures with (BGN) or without (BG) the application of synthetic nitrogen on forage production and stocker cattle performance.

Results

Differences were observed for average daily gain (p = 0.10), gain per hectare (p = 0.02) and stocking rate (p = 0.01), in that BGA was greatest compared to BGN and BG, which did not differ from each other. Furthermore, BGA had increased forage crude protein (p = 0.01) and total digestible nutrients (p = 0.01) compared to BGN and BG. Finally, BGA provided the greatest economic return per hectare compared to BG or BGN.

Conclusions

These data illustrate improved animal performance and forage nutritive value using alfalfa–bermudagrass systems and offer a viable option for producers seeking alternatives to synthetic N sources for bermudagrass pastures in the Southeastern United States.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在放牧系统中以苜蓿作为替代氮源改良美国东南部的百慕大草
百慕大草(Cynodon spp.)是生长在美国东南部最常见的多年生暖季牧草之一。在百米草牧场中添加苜蓿可以作为氮素的替代来源,同时也可以提高牧草基质的营养价值。方法于2018年5月至9月(第1年)和2019年5月至8月(第2年)在美国乔治亚州蒂夫顿进行为期2年的随机完全区组设计放牧评估。目的是比较紫花苜蓿-百德草混合牧场(BGA)与百德草单作牧场(BGA)的产量和合成氮的施用对饲料生产和牛生产性能的影响。结果平均日增重(p = 0.10)、每公顷增重(p = 0.02)和载畜率(p = 0.01)存在差异,其中BGA最大,BGN和BG之间无显著差异。此外,与BGN和BG相比,BGA显著提高了饲料粗蛋白质(p = 0.01)和总可消化养分(p = 0.01)。最后,与BG或BGN相比,BGA提供了每公顷最大的经济回报。这些数据表明,紫花苜蓿-百慕大草系统可以提高动物生产性能和饲料营养价值,并为美国东南部百慕大草牧场的生产者寻找替代合成氮源的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Forage yield and nutritive value of plantain and chicory for livestock feed at high altitudes in Peru Our world is changing Biocontrol agents enhance plant disease resistance by altering plant microbiomes Effect of fermented total mixed rations on rumen microbial communities and serum metabolites in lambs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1