Comparison of penile vascular effect induced by intracavernous injection of papaverine and prostaglandin E1.

T I Hwang, T F Lue, C R Yang, C L Chang, C H Chang, H C Wu
{"title":"Comparison of penile vascular effect induced by intracavernous injection of papaverine and prostaglandin E1.","authors":"T I Hwang,&nbsp;T F Lue,&nbsp;C R Yang,&nbsp;C L Chang,&nbsp;C H Chang,&nbsp;H C Wu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An intracavernous injection with papaverine or prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) combined with duplex ultrasonography is an objective technique to conduct a penile blood flow study (PBFS). Three hundred patients with impotence underwent papaverine (9-60 mg) induced PBFS at the University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco (UCSF), U.S.A. and another 80 patients with impotence received PGE1-induced (20 micrograms) PBFS at Veterans General Hospital-Taichung (VGH-TC), R.O.C. Preliminary evaluation of age, duration of disease and pre-injection diameter of cavernous arteries disclosed no significant difference in these 2 series. It was interesting to find that almost all parameters of vascular response to pavaverine vs PGE1 differed significantly, such as onset of response (6.5 +/- 6.5 vs 11.7 +/- 6.4 min, slower in the PGE1 group, p less than 0.001); post-injection diameter of cavernous arteries (right: 0.73 +/- 0.20 vs 0.79 +/- 0.18 mm, p = 0.03; left: 0.74 +/- 0.20 vs 0.82 +/- 0.21 mm, p = 0.005); diametral increment of cavernous arteries (right: 0.23 +/- 0.17 vs 0.33 +/- 0.17 mm, p less than 0.001; left: 0.24 +/- 0.17 vs 0.36 +/- 0.19 mm, p less than 0.001) and peak velocity (right: 27.5 +/- 16.1 vs 42.0 +/- 20.1 cm/sec, p less than 0.001; left: 28.9 +/- 15.9 vs 39.7 +/- 17.9 cm/sec, p less than 0.001). The side effects, primarily injection pain (23.8%, 19/80) in the PGE1 group and dizziness (3.0%, 9/300) in the papaverine group, were minor in these 2 series. Prolonged erection was not encountered in either series; however, immediate treatment was performed if a papaverine-induced erection lasted over 60 minutes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":22189,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan yi xue hui za zhi. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan yi xue hui za zhi. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An intracavernous injection with papaverine or prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) combined with duplex ultrasonography is an objective technique to conduct a penile blood flow study (PBFS). Three hundred patients with impotence underwent papaverine (9-60 mg) induced PBFS at the University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco (UCSF), U.S.A. and another 80 patients with impotence received PGE1-induced (20 micrograms) PBFS at Veterans General Hospital-Taichung (VGH-TC), R.O.C. Preliminary evaluation of age, duration of disease and pre-injection diameter of cavernous arteries disclosed no significant difference in these 2 series. It was interesting to find that almost all parameters of vascular response to pavaverine vs PGE1 differed significantly, such as onset of response (6.5 +/- 6.5 vs 11.7 +/- 6.4 min, slower in the PGE1 group, p less than 0.001); post-injection diameter of cavernous arteries (right: 0.73 +/- 0.20 vs 0.79 +/- 0.18 mm, p = 0.03; left: 0.74 +/- 0.20 vs 0.82 +/- 0.21 mm, p = 0.005); diametral increment of cavernous arteries (right: 0.23 +/- 0.17 vs 0.33 +/- 0.17 mm, p less than 0.001; left: 0.24 +/- 0.17 vs 0.36 +/- 0.19 mm, p less than 0.001) and peak velocity (right: 27.5 +/- 16.1 vs 42.0 +/- 20.1 cm/sec, p less than 0.001; left: 28.9 +/- 15.9 vs 39.7 +/- 17.9 cm/sec, p less than 0.001). The side effects, primarily injection pain (23.8%, 19/80) in the PGE1 group and dizziness (3.0%, 9/300) in the papaverine group, were minor in these 2 series. Prolonged erection was not encountered in either series; however, immediate treatment was performed if a papaverine-induced erection lasted over 60 minutes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海绵内注射罂粟碱与前列腺素E1对阴茎血管影响的比较。
海绵内注射罂粟碱或前列腺素E1 (PGE1)结合双工超声检查是一种进行阴茎血流研究(PBFS)的客观技术。300例阳痿患者在美国加州大学旧金山分校(UCSF)接受了papaverine (9- 60mg)诱导的PBFS,另外80例阳痿患者在台湾退伍军人总医院(VGH-TC)接受了pge1(20微克)诱导的PBFS。两组患者的年龄、病程和注射前海绵状动脉直径的初步评估显示,两组患者无显著差异。有趣的是,我们发现pavaverine与PGE1的血管反应的几乎所有参数都有显著差异,例如反应开始时间(6.5 +/- 6.5 vs 11.7 +/- 6.4 min, PGE1组较慢,p < 0.001);海绵状动脉注射后直径(右:0.73 +/- 0.20 vs 0.79 +/- 0.18 mm, p = 0.03;左:0.74 + / - 0.20 vs 0.82 + / - 0.21毫米,p = 0.005);海绵动脉直径增加(右:0.23 +/- 0.17 vs 0.33 +/- 0.17 mm, p < 0.001;左:0.24 +/- 0.17 vs 0.36 +/- 0.19 mm, p小于0.001)和峰值速度(右:27.5 +/- 16.1 vs 42.0 +/- 20.1 cm/秒,p小于0.001;左:28.9 +/- 15.9 vs 39.7 +/- 17.9 cm/秒,p < 0.001)。在这两个系列中,PGE1组的主要副作用是注射疼痛(23.8%,19/80),罂粟碱组的主要副作用是头晕(3.0%,9/300)。两组均未出现长时间勃起;然而,如果罂粟碱引起的勃起持续超过60分钟,则立即进行治疗。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rapid spectrophotometric method for quantitation of acetaminophen in serum. Apolipoproteins A-I and B in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Postoperative echocardiographic study of patients with symptomatic chronic aortic regurgitation. Cytomegalovirus retinitis treated with ganciclovir in a renal transplant recipient. Anterior pituitary functions in patients with uremia tested by stimulation with four combined hypothalamic releasing hormones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1