The stress response to surgery: release mechanisms and the modifying effect of pain relief.

H Kehlet
{"title":"The stress response to surgery: release mechanisms and the modifying effect of pain relief.","authors":"H Kehlet","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This short review updates information on the release mechanisms of the systemic response to surgical injury and the modifying effect of pain relief. Initiation of the response is primarily due to afferent nerve impulses combined with release of humoral substances (such as prostaglandins, kinins, leukotrienes, interleukin-1, and tumor necrosis factor), while amplification factors include semi-starvation, infection, and hemorrhage. The relative role of the various signals in producing the complex injury response has not been finally determined, but the neural pathway is probably most important in releasing the classical endocrine catabolic response, while humoral factors are important for the hyperthermic response, changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis immunofunction, and capillary permeability. The modifying effect of pain relief on the surgical stress response is dependent upon the technique of analgesia. However, the effect on humoral-mediated responses is small, regardless of the technique used. Afferent neural blockade with local anesthetics is the most effective technique for reducing the endocrine-metabolic response, but only in operations in the lower part of the abdomen, probably because of insufficient afferent blockade during thoracic epidural analgesia. Systemic opiate administration, as well as non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs, exert only a small modifying effect on the response. Low-dose combined analgesic regimens may provide total pain relief, but exert no important effect on the stress response. In summary, pain alleviation itself may not necessarily lead to an important modification of the stress response, and a combined approach with inhibition of the neural and humoral release mechanisms is necessary for a pronounced inhibition or prevention of the response to surgical injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":7309,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum","volume":"550 ","pages":"22-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This short review updates information on the release mechanisms of the systemic response to surgical injury and the modifying effect of pain relief. Initiation of the response is primarily due to afferent nerve impulses combined with release of humoral substances (such as prostaglandins, kinins, leukotrienes, interleukin-1, and tumor necrosis factor), while amplification factors include semi-starvation, infection, and hemorrhage. The relative role of the various signals in producing the complex injury response has not been finally determined, but the neural pathway is probably most important in releasing the classical endocrine catabolic response, while humoral factors are important for the hyperthermic response, changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis immunofunction, and capillary permeability. The modifying effect of pain relief on the surgical stress response is dependent upon the technique of analgesia. However, the effect on humoral-mediated responses is small, regardless of the technique used. Afferent neural blockade with local anesthetics is the most effective technique for reducing the endocrine-metabolic response, but only in operations in the lower part of the abdomen, probably because of insufficient afferent blockade during thoracic epidural analgesia. Systemic opiate administration, as well as non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs, exert only a small modifying effect on the response. Low-dose combined analgesic regimens may provide total pain relief, but exert no important effect on the stress response. In summary, pain alleviation itself may not necessarily lead to an important modification of the stress response, and a combined approach with inhibition of the neural and humoral release mechanisms is necessary for a pronounced inhibition or prevention of the response to surgical injury.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术后的应激反应:释放机制和疼痛缓解的调节作用。
这篇简短的综述更新了关于手术损伤的全身反应释放机制和疼痛缓解的调节作用的信息。反应的启动主要是由于传入神经冲动结合体液物质(如前列腺素、激肽、白三烯、白细胞介素-1和肿瘤坏死因子)的释放,而放大因素包括半饥饿、感染和出血。各种信号在产生复杂损伤反应中的相对作用尚未最终确定,但神经通路可能在释放经典的内分泌分解代谢反应中最重要,而体液因子对高热反应、凝血和纤溶免疫功能的改变以及毛细血管通透性都很重要。疼痛缓解对手术应激反应的调节作用取决于镇痛技术。然而,无论使用何种技术,对体液介导的反应的影响都很小。局部麻醉药阻断传入神经是降低内分泌代谢反应最有效的方法,但仅适用于下腹部手术,可能是由于胸椎硬膜外镇痛时传入神经阻断不够。全身服用阿片类药物,以及非甾体类抗炎药物,对这种反应只有很小的调节作用。低剂量联合镇痛方案可能提供完全的疼痛缓解,但对应激反应没有重要影响。总之,疼痛缓解本身可能并不一定会导致应激反应的重要改变,抑制神经和体液释放机制的联合方法对于明显抑制或预防手术损伤反应是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Renal perfusion and metabolism in experimental endotoxin shock. From unfractionated heparins to low molecular weight heparins. Enoxaparin prophylaxis in elective hip surgery. Once-daily dosing of enoxaparin (a low molecular weight heparin) in prevention of deep vein thrombosis after total hip replacement. Treatment of established venous thromboembolism with enoxaparin: preliminary report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1