The "Hitch-Stitch" for Preventing High Tracheal Stent Migration: Expanding Indications and Extended Experience.

Sameer Bansal, Samiksha S Kumar, Chakravarthi Loknath, Hariprasad Kalpakam, Abhinav Singla, Ravindra M Mehta
{"title":"The \"Hitch-Stitch\" for Preventing High Tracheal Stent Migration: Expanding Indications and Extended Experience.","authors":"Sameer Bansal, Samiksha S Kumar, Chakravarthi Loknath, Hariprasad Kalpakam, Abhinav Singla, Ravindra M Mehta","doi":"10.1097/LBR.0000000000000954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Airway stenting is a standard treatment option for tracheo-bronchial obstruction and other conditions like tracheo-esophageal fistula (TEF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To prevent stent migration, a percutaneous fixation strategy called the \"hitch-stitch\" was described in 2016 as an efficient technique. We describe an extended experience of the \"hitch-stitch\" for silicone stents in high tracheal stenting situations and expanding indications to metal stents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-four percutaneous stitches were placed in 54 patients (36 males and 18 females). The mean age of the patients was 42 (±19) years. The indication for stenting was tracheal stenosis in 63/74 (85%) cases and TEF in 11/74 (15%) cases. Silicone stents were used in 56/74 (75.5%) cases while self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) were used in 18/74 (24.5%) cases. The majority of the stents (62/74, 85%) were high tracheal stents. The \"hitch-stitch\" as an anti-migration strategy had a high success rate, with distal stent migration in only 2 cases (2.7%) as the stitch had given way-these were repositioned and hitched with double stitches. Minor complications included delayed skin healing (2.8%) and suture site infection (1.4%), which was successfully managed with oral antibiotics. Stitch removal was easy with no complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large series of percutaneous \"hitch-stitch\" as a stent migration prevention strategy, long-term data shows it is safe and effective in an expanded cohort of silicone stents. Its extended utility is the successful application to metal stents, especially in TEF, where the consequences can be deleterious. It is simple to do, with minimal extra requirements and not associated with any significant complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":15268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/LBR.0000000000000954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Airway stenting is a standard treatment option for tracheo-bronchial obstruction and other conditions like tracheo-esophageal fistula (TEF).

Methods: To prevent stent migration, a percutaneous fixation strategy called the "hitch-stitch" was described in 2016 as an efficient technique. We describe an extended experience of the "hitch-stitch" for silicone stents in high tracheal stenting situations and expanding indications to metal stents.

Results: Seventy-four percutaneous stitches were placed in 54 patients (36 males and 18 females). The mean age of the patients was 42 (±19) years. The indication for stenting was tracheal stenosis in 63/74 (85%) cases and TEF in 11/74 (15%) cases. Silicone stents were used in 56/74 (75.5%) cases while self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) were used in 18/74 (24.5%) cases. The majority of the stents (62/74, 85%) were high tracheal stents. The "hitch-stitch" as an anti-migration strategy had a high success rate, with distal stent migration in only 2 cases (2.7%) as the stitch had given way-these were repositioned and hitched with double stitches. Minor complications included delayed skin healing (2.8%) and suture site infection (1.4%), which was successfully managed with oral antibiotics. Stitch removal was easy with no complications.

Conclusion: In this large series of percutaneous "hitch-stitch" as a stent migration prevention strategy, long-term data shows it is safe and effective in an expanded cohort of silicone stents. Its extended utility is the successful application to metal stents, especially in TEF, where the consequences can be deleterious. It is simple to do, with minimal extra requirements and not associated with any significant complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
防止气管支架高位移位的“结针”:扩大适应症和扩展经验。
背景:气道支架植入术是气管-支气管梗阻和气管-食管瘘(TEF)等其他疾病的标准治疗选择。方法:为了防止支架移动,一种被称为“缝线”的经皮固定策略在2016年被描述为一种有效的技术。我们描述了一个扩展的经验,“缝线”硅胶支架在高气管支架情况和扩大适应症的金属支架。结果:54例患者(男36例,女18例)经皮缝合74针。患者平均年龄42(±19)岁。63/74例(85%)气管狭窄和11/74例(15%)TEF是支架植入术的指征。硅胶支架56/74(75.5%),自膨胀金属支架18/74(24.5%)。大多数支架(62/74,85%)为高位气管支架。“缝线”作为一种抗移动策略具有很高的成功率,只有2例(2.7%)的支架远端移动,因为缝线已经失效,这些支架被重新定位并用双缝线连接。轻微的并发症包括皮肤愈合延迟(2.8%)和缝合处感染(1.4%),口服抗生素治疗成功。取针容易,无并发症。结论:在这个大范围的经皮“缝针”作为支架移位预防策略中,长期数据显示它在扩大的硅胶支架队列中是安全有效的。其扩展用途是成功应用于金属支架,特别是在TEF中,其后果可能是有害的。这样做很简单,只需要很少的额外需求,也没有任何明显的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
121
期刊最新文献
Ibrutinib and Bleeding Hazards During Bronchoscopy. Rapid Pleurodesis in Patients With Chronic Noninfectious Pleural Effusion: Twenty Years of Real-world Performance Data. Safety and Efficacy of Rigid Bronchoscopy-guided Percutaneous Dilational Tracheostomy: A Single-center Experience. Diagnostic Value and Safety of Addition of Transbronchial Needle Aspiration to Transbronchial Biopsy Through Endobronchial Ultrasonography Using a Guide Sheath Under Virtual Bronchoscopic Navigation for the Diagnosis of Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions. Percutaneous Airway Silicone Stent External Fixation Outcomes and Techniques: Case Series With Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1