Psychiatric Screening Measures in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-20 DOI:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230041
Peter S Pressman, Joie Molden, Hal S Wortzel, Evan Plys, Jonathan H Woodcock, Christopher M Filley, David B Arciniegas
{"title":"Psychiatric Screening Measures in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia.","authors":"Peter S Pressman, Joie Molden, Hal S Wortzel, Evan Plys, Jonathan H Woodcock, Christopher M Filley, David B Arciniegas","doi":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is sometimes misdiagnosed as a primary psychiatric disorder, such as major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, an anxiety disorder, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Nonspecialists often use screening measures for primary psychiatric disorders in early assessments of persons with bvFTD. The investigators aimed to evaluate the manifestations of bvFTD in surveys intended to screen for primary psychiatric disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with bvFTD (N=27) presenting to an academic neurobehavior specialty clinic and their caregivers were provided questionnaire packets including the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD-7), the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale, version 1.1, the Ritvo Autism and Asperger Diagnostic Scale, and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire. Established cutoff scores suggesting the presence of a primary psychiatric disorder were used to define a \"positive\" response. Individual questions from each screening questionnaire were examined for a more granular characterization of bvFTD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 15% of bvFTD patients screened positive for bipolar disorder, 54% screened positive for ADHD, and 89% screened positive for ASD. Hyperactivity or hypersensitivity symptoms were infrequently endorsed. In addition, 57% of respondents screened positive for depressive symptoms on the PHQ-9, and 43% screened positive for anxiety symptoms on the GAD-7.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of cutoff scores on screening measures for primary psychiatric disorders resulted in potentially problematic positive screens of primary psychiatric disorders among persons with bvFTD. Identifying specific questions that distinguish between bvFTD and primary psychiatric disorders requires further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":16559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"160-165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is sometimes misdiagnosed as a primary psychiatric disorder, such as major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, an anxiety disorder, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Nonspecialists often use screening measures for primary psychiatric disorders in early assessments of persons with bvFTD. The investigators aimed to evaluate the manifestations of bvFTD in surveys intended to screen for primary psychiatric disorders.

Methods: Patients with bvFTD (N=27) presenting to an academic neurobehavior specialty clinic and their caregivers were provided questionnaire packets including the Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD-7), the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale, version 1.1, the Ritvo Autism and Asperger Diagnostic Scale, and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire. Established cutoff scores suggesting the presence of a primary psychiatric disorder were used to define a "positive" response. Individual questions from each screening questionnaire were examined for a more granular characterization of bvFTD.

Results: Overall, 15% of bvFTD patients screened positive for bipolar disorder, 54% screened positive for ADHD, and 89% screened positive for ASD. Hyperactivity or hypersensitivity symptoms were infrequently endorsed. In addition, 57% of respondents screened positive for depressive symptoms on the PHQ-9, and 43% screened positive for anxiety symptoms on the GAD-7.

Conclusions: The use of cutoff scores on screening measures for primary psychiatric disorders resulted in potentially problematic positive screens of primary psychiatric disorders among persons with bvFTD. Identifying specific questions that distinguish between bvFTD and primary psychiatric disorders requires further study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行为变异额颞叶痴呆的精神病学筛查措施。
目的:行为变异性额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)有时被误诊为原发性精神障碍,如重度抑郁症、双相情感障碍、焦虑障碍、自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)或注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)。非专业人士经常在早期评估bvFTD患者时使用原发性精神疾病的筛查措施。研究人员旨在评估bvFTD在筛查原发性精神疾病调查中的表现。方法:采用心境障碍问卷(MDQ)、患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)、广泛性焦虑障碍-7量表(GAD-7)、成人ADHD自述量表(1.1版)、Ritvo自闭症与阿斯伯格诊断量表(Ritvo Autism and Asperger diagnosis scale)和神经精神量表(Neuropsychiatric Inventory questionnaire)对27例bvFTD患者及其护理人员进行问卷调查。表明存在原发性精神障碍的既定分值被用来定义“积极”反应。对每个筛选问卷中的个别问题进行检查,以获得bvFTD的更细粒度特征。结果:总体而言,15%的bvFTD患者双相情感障碍筛查阳性,54%的ADHD筛查阳性,89%的ASD筛查阳性。多动或过敏症状很少被认可。此外,57%的受访者在PHQ-9中抑郁症状筛查呈阳性,43%的受访者在GAD-7中焦虑症状筛查呈阳性。结论:在原发性精神障碍筛查措施中使用截止分数导致bvFTD患者的原发性精神障碍筛查可能存在问题。确定区分bvFTD和原发性精神疾病的具体问题需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
67
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official Journal of the American Neuropsychiatric Association, the premier North American organization of clinicians, scientists, and educators specializing in behavioral neurology & neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and the clinical neurosciences, the Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences (JNCN) aims to publish works that advance the science of brain-behavior relationships, the care of persons and families affected by neurodevelopmental, acquired neurological, and neurodegenerative conditions, and education and training in behavioral neurology & neuropsychiatry. JNCN publishes peer-reviewed articles on the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral manifestations of neurological conditions, the structural and functional neuroanatomy of idiopathic psychiatric disorders, and the clinical and educational applications and public health implications of scientific advances in these areas. The Journal features systematic reviews and meta-analyses, narrative reviews, original research articles, scholarly considerations of treatment and educational challenges in behavioral neurology & neuropsychiatry, analyses and commentaries on advances and emerging trends in the field, international perspectives on neuropsychiatry, opinions and introspections, case reports that inform on the structural and functional bases of neuropsychiatric conditions, and classic pieces from the field’s rich history.
期刊最新文献
Breaking Down Binary Thinking in Neuropsychiatry. Functional Vision Loss Among Adults and Children: Literature Review and Comparative Analysis. Multicenter Evaluation of Memory Remediation in Traumatic Brain Injury With Donepezil: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Altered Neural Processing of Interoception in Patients With Functional Neurological Disorder: A Task-Based fMRI Study. Apathy and Functional Status in Early-Stage Huntington's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1