Endocardial pacing compared to epicardial left ventricle pacing and right ventricle pacing: A single-center long-term experience in a pediatric population

Paolo Gatti , Håkan Eliasson , Fredrik Gadler
{"title":"Endocardial pacing compared to epicardial left ventricle pacing and right ventricle pacing: A single-center long-term experience in a pediatric population","authors":"Paolo Gatti ,&nbsp;Håkan Eliasson ,&nbsp;Fredrik Gadler","doi":"10.1016/j.ipej.2023.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><p>Pediatric pacing is usually performed as epicardial pacing in small children in need of pacemaker therapy. Epicardial pacing compared with transvenous pacing for pediatric complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) has different strengths and weaknesses. The epicardial left ventricular wall position of the lead has been considered superior, in terms of contraction pattern, compared to a transvenous right ventricular stimulation. We aimed to compare QRS duration and cardiac function before and after the switch from epicardial to transvenous pacing in a pediatric population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Pediatric patients with congenital or acquired CAVB, who underwent a switch from epicardial-to transvenous pacing at our center from 2005 to 2021, were identified through the national ICD- and Pacemaker Registry. Data regarding clinical status, ECG, and echocardiography before and after the switch and at last follow-up were collected.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 15 children. The median age at the switch was 6.7 (4.4–11.7) years with a median weight of 21 (15–39) Kg. The median QRS duration with the transvenous systems was 136 (128–152) ms vs. a QRS duration during epicardial stimulation of 150 (144–170) ms with a median difference in QRS duration of 14 (6–20) ms. Children with a post-surgical AV block had a broader QRS duration, both with epicardial and endocardial stimulation. Before the switch, there was one patient with impaired left ventricular function (LVF) but with normal left ventricular end-diastolic diameters. After the switch, one patient developed symptomatic LV dysfunction with the recovery of LVF at the last follow-up after being implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy device.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our report of pediatric patients after switching from epicardial to transvenous pacing shows how transvenous pacing is not inferior to epicardial pacing in terms of QRS duration and no significant deterioration of cardiac function was detectable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35900,"journal":{"name":"Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629223001237/pdfft?md5=63a74cc5914e697c87916a38737ef619&pid=1-s2.0-S0972629223001237-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972629223001237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

Pediatric pacing is usually performed as epicardial pacing in small children in need of pacemaker therapy. Epicardial pacing compared with transvenous pacing for pediatric complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) has different strengths and weaknesses. The epicardial left ventricular wall position of the lead has been considered superior, in terms of contraction pattern, compared to a transvenous right ventricular stimulation. We aimed to compare QRS duration and cardiac function before and after the switch from epicardial to transvenous pacing in a pediatric population.

Methods

Pediatric patients with congenital or acquired CAVB, who underwent a switch from epicardial-to transvenous pacing at our center from 2005 to 2021, were identified through the national ICD- and Pacemaker Registry. Data regarding clinical status, ECG, and echocardiography before and after the switch and at last follow-up were collected.

Results

We included 15 children. The median age at the switch was 6.7 (4.4–11.7) years with a median weight of 21 (15–39) Kg. The median QRS duration with the transvenous systems was 136 (128–152) ms vs. a QRS duration during epicardial stimulation of 150 (144–170) ms with a median difference in QRS duration of 14 (6–20) ms. Children with a post-surgical AV block had a broader QRS duration, both with epicardial and endocardial stimulation. Before the switch, there was one patient with impaired left ventricular function (LVF) but with normal left ventricular end-diastolic diameters. After the switch, one patient developed symptomatic LV dysfunction with the recovery of LVF at the last follow-up after being implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy device.

Conclusions

Our report of pediatric patients after switching from epicardial to transvenous pacing shows how transvenous pacing is not inferior to epicardial pacing in terms of QRS duration and no significant deterioration of cardiac function was detectable.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心内膜起搏与心外膜左心室起搏和右心室起搏的比较:儿科人群的单中心长期经验。
背景和目的:儿童起搏通常作为心外膜起搏在需要起搏器治疗的幼儿。心外膜起搏与经静脉起搏治疗小儿完全房室传导阻滞(CAVB)有不同的优缺点。与经静脉右心室刺激相比,心外膜左心室壁的导联位置在收缩模式方面被认为是优越的。我们的目的是比较儿科人群从心外膜起搏到经静脉起搏前后的QRS持续时间和心功能。方法:通过国家ICD和起搏器登记处识别2005年至2021年在我们中心从心外膜起搏转向经静脉起搏的先天性或获得性CAVB儿科患者。收集转换前后及最后随访的临床状态、心电图、超声心动图资料。结果:我们纳入了15名儿童。转换时的中位年龄为6.7(4.4-11.7)岁,中位体重为21 (15-39)Kg。经静脉系统的QRS持续时间中位数为136 (128-152)ms,而心外膜刺激时的QRS持续时间中位数为150 (144-170)ms, QRS持续时间中位数差异为14 (6-20)ms。手术后房颤阻断的儿童在心外膜和心内膜刺激时的QRS持续时间均较宽。切换前,有1例左心室功能受损,但左心室舒张末期直径正常。切换后,1例患者在植入心脏再同步化治疗装置后,在最后一次随访时LVF恢复,出现症状性左室功能障碍。结论:我们对从心外膜起搏转换为经静脉起搏的儿科患者的报告显示,在QRS持续时间方面,经静脉起搏并不逊于心外膜起搏,而且没有检测到明显的心功能恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal
Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Indian Pacing and Electrophysiology Journal is a peer reviewed online journal devoted to cardiac pacing and electrophysiology. Editorial Advisory Board includes eminent personalities in the field of cardiac pacing and electrophysiology from Asia, Australia, Europe and North America.
期刊最新文献
Atrial leadless pacemaker implant using Aveir VR in an Adolescent with congenital heart disease. Feasibility of a using chest strap and dry electrode system for longer term cardiac arrhythmia monitoring: Correspondence. Two distinct stages and mechanisms of ST-elevation during cryothermal cavotricuspid isthmus ablation guided by intracardiac echocardiography: A case report. Pivoting turn-around activation guided successful slow pathway ablation in the cavotricuspid isthmus. Late onset of two concurrent and dissociated arrhythmias in a transplanted heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1