Estimating a Preference-Based Value Set for the Mental Health Quality of Life Questionnaire (MHQoL).

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Decision Making Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-19 DOI:10.1177/0272989X231208645
Frédérique C W van Krugten, Marcel F Jonker, Sebastian F W Himmler, Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen, Werner B F Brouwer
{"title":"Estimating a Preference-Based Value Set for the Mental Health Quality of Life Questionnaire (MHQoL).","authors":"Frédérique C W van Krugten, Marcel F Jonker, Sebastian F W Himmler, Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen, Werner B F Brouwer","doi":"10.1177/0272989X231208645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health economic evaluations using common health-related quality of life measures may fall short in adequately measuring and valuing the benefits of mental health care interventions. The Mental Health Quality of Life questionnaire (MHQoL) is a standardized, self-administered mental health-related quality of life instrument covering 7 dimensions known to be relevant across and valued highly by people with mental health problems. The aim of this study was to derive a Dutch value set for the MHQoL to facilitate its use in cost-utility analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The value set was estimated using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with duration that accommodated nonlinear time preferences. The DCE was embedded in a web-based self-complete survey and administered to a representative sample (<i>N</i> = 1,308) of the Dutch adult population. The matched pairwise choice tasks were created using a Bayesian heterogeneous D-efficient design. The overall DCE design comprised 10 different subdesigns, with each subdesign containing 15 matched pairwise choice tasks. Each participant was asked to complete 1 of the subdesigns to which they were randomly assigned.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The obtained coefficients indicated that \"physical health,\"\"mood,\" and \"relationships\" were the most important dimensions. All coefficients were in the expected direction and reflected the monotonic structure of the MHQoL, except for level 2 of the dimension \"future.\" The predicted values for the MHQoL ranged from -0.741 for the worst state to 1 for the best state.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study derived a Dutch value set for the recently introduced MHQoL. This value set allows for the generation of an index value for all MHQoL states on a QALY scale and may hence be used in Dutch cost-utility analyses of mental healthcare interventions.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>A discrete choice experiment was used to derive a Dutch value set for the MHQoL.This allows the use of the MHQoL in Dutch cost-utility analyses.The dimensions physical health, mood, and relationships were the most important.The utility values range from -0.741 for the worst state to 1 for the best state.</p>","PeriodicalId":49839,"journal":{"name":"Medical Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":"64-75"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10714713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X231208645","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Health economic evaluations using common health-related quality of life measures may fall short in adequately measuring and valuing the benefits of mental health care interventions. The Mental Health Quality of Life questionnaire (MHQoL) is a standardized, self-administered mental health-related quality of life instrument covering 7 dimensions known to be relevant across and valued highly by people with mental health problems. The aim of this study was to derive a Dutch value set for the MHQoL to facilitate its use in cost-utility analyses.

Methods: The value set was estimated using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with duration that accommodated nonlinear time preferences. The DCE was embedded in a web-based self-complete survey and administered to a representative sample (N = 1,308) of the Dutch adult population. The matched pairwise choice tasks were created using a Bayesian heterogeneous D-efficient design. The overall DCE design comprised 10 different subdesigns, with each subdesign containing 15 matched pairwise choice tasks. Each participant was asked to complete 1 of the subdesigns to which they were randomly assigned.

Results: The obtained coefficients indicated that "physical health,""mood," and "relationships" were the most important dimensions. All coefficients were in the expected direction and reflected the monotonic structure of the MHQoL, except for level 2 of the dimension "future." The predicted values for the MHQoL ranged from -0.741 for the worst state to 1 for the best state.

Conclusions: This study derived a Dutch value set for the recently introduced MHQoL. This value set allows for the generation of an index value for all MHQoL states on a QALY scale and may hence be used in Dutch cost-utility analyses of mental healthcare interventions.

Highlights: A discrete choice experiment was used to derive a Dutch value set for the MHQoL.This allows the use of the MHQoL in Dutch cost-utility analyses.The dimensions physical health, mood, and relationships were the most important.The utility values range from -0.741 for the worst state to 1 for the best state.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理健康生活质量问卷(MHQoL)基于偏好的值集估计。
背景:使用常见的与健康有关的生活质量指标进行健康经济评估,可能无法充分衡量和评价精神卫生保健干预措施的益处。心理健康生活质量问卷(MHQoL)是一种标准化的、自我管理的心理健康相关生活质量工具,涵盖7个维度,这些维度已知与心理健康问题相关,并受到心理健康问题患者的高度重视。本研究的目的是推导出MHQoL的荷兰值集,以促进其在成本效用分析中的使用。方法:使用离散选择实验(DCE)估计值集,该实验具有适应非线性时间偏好的持续时间。DCE嵌入在一个基于网络的自我完成调查中,并对荷兰成年人口的代表性样本(N = 1,308)进行了管理。配对选择任务采用贝叶斯异构d效率设计。整个DCE设计包括10个不同的子设计,每个子设计包含15个匹配的两两选择任务。每个参与者被要求完成他们随机分配的一个子设计。结果:得到的系数表明,“身体健康”、“情绪”和“关系”是最重要的维度。除第二级维度“未来”外,所有系数均在预期方向,反映了MHQoL的单调结构。MHQoL的预测值从最差状态的-0.741到最佳状态的1不等。结论:本研究得出了最近引入的MHQoL的荷兰值集。该值集允许在质量质量量表上为所有MHQoL州生成指标值,因此可用于荷兰精神保健干预措施的成本效用分析。重点:一个离散选择实验被用来推导MHQoL的荷兰值集。这允许在荷兰成本效用分析中使用MHQoL。身体健康、情绪和人际关系是最重要的。效用值的范围从-0.741(最差状态)到1(最佳状态)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Decision Making
Medical Decision Making 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Decision Making offers rigorous and systematic approaches to decision making that are designed to improve the health and clinical care of individuals and to assist with health care policy development. Using the fundamentals of decision analysis and theory, economic evaluation, and evidence based quality assessment, Medical Decision Making presents both theoretical and practical statistical and modeling techniques and methods from a variety of disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Unclear Trajectory and Uncertain Benefit: Creating a Lexicon for Clinical Uncertainty in Patients with Critical or Advanced Illness Using a Delphi Consensus Process. Multi-indication Evidence Synthesis in Oncology Health Technology Assessment: Meta-analysis Methods and Their Application to a Case Study of Bevacizumab. Use of Adaptive Conjoint Analysis-Based Values Clarification in a Patient Decision Aid Is Not Associated with Better Perceived Values Clarity or Reduced Decisional Conflict but Enhances Values Congruence. A Sequential Calibration Approach to Address Challenges of Repeated Calibration of a COVID-19 Model. A Longitudinal Study of the Association of Awareness of Disease Incurability with Patient-Reported Outcomes in Heart Failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1