Optimizing a tableau reasoner and its implementation in Prolog

Pub Date : 2021-11-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-29 DOI:10.1016/j.websem.2021.100677
Riccardo Zese , Giuseppe Cota
{"title":"Optimizing a tableau reasoner and its implementation in Prolog","authors":"Riccardo Zese ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Cota","doi":"10.1016/j.websem.2021.100677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>One of the foremost reasoning services for knowledge bases is finding all the justifications for a query. This is useful for debugging purpose and for coping with uncertainty. Among </span>Description Logics<span><span> (DLs) reasoners, the tableau algorithm is one of the most used. However, in order to collect the justifications, the reasoners must manage the non-determinism of the </span>tableau method. For these reasons, a Prolog implementation can facilitate the management of such non-determinism.</span></p><p>The TRILL framework contains three probabilistic reasoners written in Prolog: TRILL, TRILL<sup><em>P</em></sup><span> and TORNADO. Since they are all part of the same framework, the choice about which to use can be done easily via the framework settings. Each one of them uses different approaches for probabilistic inference and handles different DLs flavors. Our previous work showed that they can sometimes achieve better results than state-of-the-art (non-)probabilistic reasoners.</span></p><p>In this paper we present two optimizations that improve the performances of the TRILL reasoners. The first one consists into identifying the fragment of the KB that allows to perform inference without losing the completeness. The second one modifies which tableau rule to apply and their order of application, in order to reduce the number of operations. Experimental results show the effectiveness of the introduced optimizations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":75319,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"71 ","pages":"Article 100677"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570826821000524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the foremost reasoning services for knowledge bases is finding all the justifications for a query. This is useful for debugging purpose and for coping with uncertainty. Among Description Logics (DLs) reasoners, the tableau algorithm is one of the most used. However, in order to collect the justifications, the reasoners must manage the non-determinism of the tableau method. For these reasons, a Prolog implementation can facilitate the management of such non-determinism.

The TRILL framework contains three probabilistic reasoners written in Prolog: TRILL, TRILLP and TORNADO. Since they are all part of the same framework, the choice about which to use can be done easily via the framework settings. Each one of them uses different approaches for probabilistic inference and handles different DLs flavors. Our previous work showed that they can sometimes achieve better results than state-of-the-art (non-)probabilistic reasoners.

In this paper we present two optimizations that improve the performances of the TRILL reasoners. The first one consists into identifying the fragment of the KB that allows to perform inference without losing the completeness. The second one modifies which tableau rule to apply and their order of application, in order to reduce the number of operations. Experimental results show the effectiveness of the introduced optimizations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化一个表推理器及其在Prolog中的实现
知识库最重要的推理服务之一是找到查询的所有理由。这对于调试和处理不确定性非常有用。在描述逻辑(dl)推理器中,表算法是最常用的一种。然而,为了收集理由,推理者必须管理表格方法的非决定论。由于这些原因,Prolog实现可以方便地管理这种不确定性。TRILL框架包含三个用Prolog编写的概率推理器:TRILL、TRILLP和TORNADO。由于它们都是同一框架的一部分,因此可以通过框架设置轻松地选择使用哪一个。它们中的每一个都使用不同的方法进行概率推理,并处理不同的dl风格。我们之前的工作表明,它们有时可以比最先进的(非)概率推理器获得更好的结果。在本文中,我们提出了两种改进TRILL推理器性能的优化方法。第一个步骤包括识别允许在不丢失完整性的情况下执行推理的知识库片段。第二种方法修改要应用的表规则及其应用顺序,以减少操作的数量。实验结果表明了所引入的优化方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1