Are there gender differences in promotion–prevention self-regulatory focus?

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY British journal of psychology Pub Date : 2023-11-20 DOI:10.1111/bjop.12688
Dinah Gutermuth, Melvyn R. W. Hamstra
{"title":"Are there gender differences in promotion–prevention self-regulatory focus?","authors":"Dinah Gutermuth,&nbsp;Melvyn R. W. Hamstra","doi":"10.1111/bjop.12688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this research is to examine gender differences in promotion/prevention self-regulatory focus, a dispositional motivational orientation with major implications for human functioning. First, a review of literature using social cognitive theory as a framework suggests that, driven by socialization processes, (1) women may on average be more prevention focused than men – meaning more vigilant to maintain a secure status quo, whereas (2) men may on average be more promotion focused than women – meaning more eager to advance to a better situation than their status quo. Second, we provide data to examine these possible gender differences in self-regulatory focus with secondary analyses of (a) our own existing data on dispositional regulatory focus and of (b) a large scale, representative panel study (LISS Survey). The data suggest a highly consistent difference with women being more prevention focused than men, while the difference in promotion focus is much smaller and is only found in European samples. Auxiliary data suggest promotion-focused women hold less traditional gender role beliefs as well as showing that regulatory focus partially explains examples of behavioural differences between men and women. The analysis of gender difference in regulatory focus sheds new light on gender differences and biases already known, and on regulatory focus, and as such opens up many new and important areas of future inquiry.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjop.12688","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine gender differences in promotion/prevention self-regulatory focus, a dispositional motivational orientation with major implications for human functioning. First, a review of literature using social cognitive theory as a framework suggests that, driven by socialization processes, (1) women may on average be more prevention focused than men – meaning more vigilant to maintain a secure status quo, whereas (2) men may on average be more promotion focused than women – meaning more eager to advance to a better situation than their status quo. Second, we provide data to examine these possible gender differences in self-regulatory focus with secondary analyses of (a) our own existing data on dispositional regulatory focus and of (b) a large scale, representative panel study (LISS Survey). The data suggest a highly consistent difference with women being more prevention focused than men, while the difference in promotion focus is much smaller and is only found in European samples. Auxiliary data suggest promotion-focused women hold less traditional gender role beliefs as well as showing that regulatory focus partially explains examples of behavioural differences between men and women. The analysis of gender difference in regulatory focus sheds new light on gender differences and biases already known, and on regulatory focus, and as such opens up many new and important areas of future inquiry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在促进-预防自我调节焦点上是否存在性别差异?
本研究的目的是探讨促进/预防自我调节焦点的性别差异,这是一种对人类功能具有重要意义的性格动机取向。首先,一篇以社会认知理论为框架的文献综述表明,在社会化进程的驱动下,(1)女性可能平均比男性更关注预防——这意味着更警惕地维持安全现状,而(2)男性可能平均比女性更关注晋升——这意味着更渴望晋升到比现状更好的境地。其次,我们提供了数据,通过对(a)我们自己现有的关于性格调节焦点的数据和(b)大规模代表性小组研究(LISS调查)的二次分析,来检验自我调节焦点中可能存在的性别差异。数据显示,女性比男性更关注预防,而关注促销的差异要小得多,而且只在欧洲的样本中发现。辅助数据表明,以晋升为中心的女性较少持有传统的性别角色信念,同时也表明,对监管的关注部分解释了男性和女性之间行为差异的例子。对监管重点中的性别差异的分析,揭示了已知的性别差异和偏见,以及监管重点,并因此开辟了许多新的、重要的未来研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British journal of psychology
British journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychology publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognition; health and clinical psychology; developmental, social and occupational psychology. For information on specific requirements, please view Notes for Contributors. We attract a large number of international submissions each year which make major contributions across the range of psychology.
期刊最新文献
Unpacking interplays between competitiveness, cooperativeness, and social comparison orientation: A network psychometric approach and replication Positive and negative touch differentially modulate metacognitive memory judgements for emotional stimuli People have different expectations for their own versus others' use of AI-mediated communication tools. Social sharing of emotion during the collective crisis of COVID-19. Mirroring brains: How we understand others from the inside By GiacomoRizzolatti, CorradoSinigaglia. Translated by Frances Andersen, New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 2023. Hardcover US$ 46.99. ISBN: 9780198871705
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1