Discrimination reported by people with schizophrenia: cross-national variations in relation to the Human Development Index.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI:10.1017/S2045796023000781
P C Gronholm, S Ali, E Brohan, G Thornicroft
{"title":"Discrimination reported by people with schizophrenia: cross-national variations in relation to the Human Development Index.","authors":"P C Gronholm, S Ali, E Brohan, G Thornicroft","doi":"10.1017/S2045796023000781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Mental health related stigma and discrimination is a universal phenomenon and a contributor to the adversity experienced by people with schizophrenia. Research has produced inconsistent findings on how discrimination differs across settings and the contextual factors that underpin these differences. This study investigates the association between country-level Human Development Index (HDI) and experienced and anticipated discrimination reported by people with schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a secondary data analysis of a global cross-sectional survey completed by people living with schizophrenia across 29 countries, between 2005 and 2008. Experienced and anticipated discrimination were assessed using the Discrimination and Stigma Scale (DISC-10). Countries were classified according to their 2006 HDI. Negative binomial and Poisson regression analyses with a robust standard errors approach were conducted to investigate associations between country-level HDI and discrimination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the regression analyses, no evidence was found for a linear association between HDI and experienced or anticipated discrimination. Further exploratory analyses showed a significant non-linear association between HDI ratings and experienced discrimination. Participants in \"high\" and \"very high\" HDI countries reported more experienced discrimination compared to those in \"medium\" HDI countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HDI does, to some extent, appear to be associated with how far discrimination is experienced across different contexts. More high-quality cross-national research, including research focused on \"medium\" and \"low\" countries, is needed to substantiate these findings and identify underlying factors that may explain the pattern observed for experienced discrimination, including generating new datasets that would enable for these analyses to be repeated and contrasted with more recent data. An in-depth understanding of these factors will further aid the adaptation of cross-cultural and context specific anti-stigma interventions in future.</p>","PeriodicalId":11787,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796023000781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Mental health related stigma and discrimination is a universal phenomenon and a contributor to the adversity experienced by people with schizophrenia. Research has produced inconsistent findings on how discrimination differs across settings and the contextual factors that underpin these differences. This study investigates the association between country-level Human Development Index (HDI) and experienced and anticipated discrimination reported by people with schizophrenia.

Methods: This study is a secondary data analysis of a global cross-sectional survey completed by people living with schizophrenia across 29 countries, between 2005 and 2008. Experienced and anticipated discrimination were assessed using the Discrimination and Stigma Scale (DISC-10). Countries were classified according to their 2006 HDI. Negative binomial and Poisson regression analyses with a robust standard errors approach were conducted to investigate associations between country-level HDI and discrimination.

Results: In the regression analyses, no evidence was found for a linear association between HDI and experienced or anticipated discrimination. Further exploratory analyses showed a significant non-linear association between HDI ratings and experienced discrimination. Participants in "high" and "very high" HDI countries reported more experienced discrimination compared to those in "medium" HDI countries.

Conclusions: HDI does, to some extent, appear to be associated with how far discrimination is experienced across different contexts. More high-quality cross-national research, including research focused on "medium" and "low" countries, is needed to substantiate these findings and identify underlying factors that may explain the pattern observed for experienced discrimination, including generating new datasets that would enable for these analyses to be repeated and contrasted with more recent data. An in-depth understanding of these factors will further aid the adaptation of cross-cultural and context specific anti-stigma interventions in future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精神分裂症患者报告的歧视:与人类发展指数相关的跨国差异。
目的:心理健康相关的耻辱和歧视是一种普遍现象,也是精神分裂症患者经历逆境的一个因素。关于歧视在不同环境下的差异以及支撑这些差异的背景因素,研究得出了不一致的结果。本研究调查了国家层面人类发展指数(HDI)与精神分裂症患者报告的经历和预期歧视之间的关系。方法:本研究是对2005年至2008年间29个国家的精神分裂症患者完成的一项全球横断面调查的二次数据分析。使用歧视和污名量表(DISC-10)评估经历和预期的歧视。各国根据2006年人类发展指数进行分类。采用稳健的标准误差方法进行负二项和泊松回归分析,以调查国家一级HDI与歧视之间的关系。结果:在回归分析中,没有证据表明HDI与经历或预期的歧视之间存在线性关联。进一步的探索性分析表明,HDI评分与经历过的歧视之间存在显著的非线性关联。“高”和“非常高”人类发展指数国家的参与者报告说,与“中等”人类发展指数国家的参与者相比,他们经历了更多的歧视。结论:在某种程度上,人类发展指数似乎与不同背景下遭受歧视的程度有关。需要进行更多高质量的跨国研究,包括以“中等”和“低收入”国家为重点的研究,以证实这些发现,并确定可能解释在经历过的歧视中观察到的模式的潜在因素,包括生成新的数据集,使这些分析能够重复,并与最近的数据进行对比。深入了解这些因素将进一步有助于适应跨文化和特定背景的反污名干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
1.20%
发文量
121
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences is a prestigious international, peer-reviewed journal that has been publishing in Open Access format since 2020. Formerly known as Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale and established in 1992 by Michele Tansella, the journal prioritizes highly relevant and innovative research articles and systematic reviews in the areas of public mental health and policy, mental health services and system research, as well as epidemiological and social psychiatry. Join us in advancing knowledge and understanding in these critical fields.
期刊最新文献
Interactions of the CSF3R polymorphism and early stress on future orientation: evidence for the differential model of stress-related growth. The pain and mental health comorbidity. Effectiveness of group problem management plus in distressed Syrian refugees in Türkiye: a randomized controlled trial. Let's talk about recovery in mental health: an international Delphi study of experts by experience. Obsessive-compulsive disorder and suicide: a longitudinal study in Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1