Outcomes of Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma Across Different Races.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Clinical Medicine & Research Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.3121/cmr.2023.1819
Wei Zheng So, Khi Yung Fong, Ziting Wang, Ho Yee Tiong
{"title":"Outcomes of Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma Across Different Races.","authors":"Wei Zheng So, Khi Yung Fong, Ziting Wang, Ho Yee Tiong","doi":"10.3121/cmr.2023.1819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Epidemiological outcomes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain sparse. This study aims to compare preoperative characteristics, surgical outcomes, and oncological outcomes of RCC patients at a urology unit in Singapore.<b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort analysis of 137 RCC patients in the National University Hospital of Singapore who had undergone partial nephrectomy between 2009 and 2020 was conducted. χ<sup>2</sup> tests (Chi-Square Test, Fisher's Exact Test) and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for comparing categorical and continuous variables respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for survival analysis.<b>Results:</b> In total, 137 patients were identified (Chinese [n=82], Malay [n=19], Indian [n=15], Others [n=21]). Indian patients were diagnosed at an earlier age (52.13±10.52 years, <i>P</i>=0.018). A larger percentage of Malay patients (78.9%, <i>P</i><0.001) were operated on before 2016, prior to the center's adoption of the robotic surgical technique. More Malay and Indian patients underwent laparoscopic surgery (36.8% and 46.7%, <i>P</i>=0.008), experiencing higher rates of intra-operative conversions compared to the Chinese and other ethnicities (5.3% and 13.3% vs. 0%, <i>P</i>=0.011). They also had longer post-operative stays compared to Chinese (7.42±6.46 days; 7.40±7.69 days vs. 4.88±2.87 days, <i>P</i>=0.036). Malays were much less likely to undergo robotic partial nephrectomy compared to Chinese patients (OR=0.295, 95% CI=0.102-0.856) and had the highest rate of metastatic recurrence (10.5%, <i>P</i>=0.023).</p>","PeriodicalId":47429,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine & Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.2023.1819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Epidemiological outcomes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain sparse. This study aims to compare preoperative characteristics, surgical outcomes, and oncological outcomes of RCC patients at a urology unit in Singapore.Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of 137 RCC patients in the National University Hospital of Singapore who had undergone partial nephrectomy between 2009 and 2020 was conducted. χ2 tests (Chi-Square Test, Fisher's Exact Test) and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for comparing categorical and continuous variables respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for survival analysis.Results: In total, 137 patients were identified (Chinese [n=82], Malay [n=19], Indian [n=15], Others [n=21]). Indian patients were diagnosed at an earlier age (52.13±10.52 years, P=0.018). A larger percentage of Malay patients (78.9%, P<0.001) were operated on before 2016, prior to the center's adoption of the robotic surgical technique. More Malay and Indian patients underwent laparoscopic surgery (36.8% and 46.7%, P=0.008), experiencing higher rates of intra-operative conversions compared to the Chinese and other ethnicities (5.3% and 13.3% vs. 0%, P=0.011). They also had longer post-operative stays compared to Chinese (7.42±6.46 days; 7.40±7.69 days vs. 4.88±2.87 days, P=0.036). Malays were much less likely to undergo robotic partial nephrectomy compared to Chinese patients (OR=0.295, 95% CI=0.102-0.856) and had the highest rate of metastatic recurrence (10.5%, P=0.023).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同种族的局部肾细胞癌的预后。
导读:肾细胞癌(RCC)的流行病学结果仍然稀少。本研究旨在比较新加坡泌尿科RCC患者的术前特征、手术结果和肿瘤结果。方法:对2009年至2020年在新加坡国立大学医院行部分肾切除术的137例肾癌患者进行回顾性队列分析。分类变量和连续变量的比较分别采用χ2检验(卡方检验、Fisher精确检验)和单因素方差分析(ANOVA)。Kaplan-Meier估计用于生存分析。结果:共发现137例患者(华人[n=82],马来人[n=19],印度人[n=15],其他[n=21])。印度患者诊断年龄较早(52.13±10.52岁,P=0.018)。马来族患者(78.9%,PP=0.008)术中转换率高于华人和其他种族患者(5.3%和13.3%对0%,P=0.011)。与中国患者相比,他们的术后停留时间更长(7.42±6.46天);7.40±7.69天vs. 4.88±2.87天,P=0.036)。与华人患者相比,马来人接受机器人部分肾切除术的可能性要小得多(OR=0.295, 95% CI=0.102-0.856),转移复发率最高(10.5%,P=0.023)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Medicine & Research
Clinical Medicine & Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Clinical Medicine & Research is a peer reviewed publication of original scientific medical research that is relevant to a broad audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Articles are published quarterly in the following topics: -Medicine -Clinical Research -Evidence-based Medicine -Preventive Medicine -Translational Medicine -Rural Health -Case Reports -Epidemiology -Basic science -History of Medicine -The Art of Medicine -Non-Clinical Aspects of Medicine & Science
期刊最新文献
Crafting the Future Doctor: Mentorship in the First Year of Medical School. Diagnostic Accuracy of AI Algorithms in Aortic Stenosis Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Extensive Invasive Sinusitis Secondary to Streptococcus Intermedius Infection. Long COVID or Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) in Children and Adolescents. Potential Application of Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (Anti-CCP) for the Diagnosis of Periodontal Disease in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis with Cut-Off Determination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1