Implantable Hearing Devices in Ontario: A Population-Based Study of Access to Care and Access to Devices.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Audiology and Neuro-Otology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-20 DOI:10.1159/000534384
Keshinisuthan Kirubalingam, Paul Nguyen, Ann Kang, Jason A Beyea
{"title":"Implantable Hearing Devices in Ontario: A Population-Based Study of Access to Care and Access to Devices.","authors":"Keshinisuthan Kirubalingam, Paul Nguyen, Ann Kang, Jason A Beyea","doi":"10.1159/000534384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The prevalence of hearing loss in Canada is high, with many patients requiring implantable hearing devices (IHDs) as treatment for their disease severity. Despite this need, many eligible patients do not pursue these interventions. The objective of this study was to examine rates of IHD based on geographic location to understand locoregional variation in access to care.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective population-based cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>All hospitals in the Canadian province of Ontario.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of all patients with IHD between April 1, 1992, and March 31, 2021, cochlear implants (CIs) (4,720) and bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA) (1,125) cohorts were constructed. Place of residence was categorized based on Local Health Integrated Network (LHIN). Summary statistics for place of surgical institution based on LHIN at first surgery, name of institution of first surgery and \"as the crow flies\" distance (in km) between place of residence and surgical institution were calculated. Rate of implantations was calculated for LHIN regions based on number of surgeries per 1,000,000 persons/years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Toronto Central, Central, Central East, and Champlain regions had &gt;10% of patients undergoing BAHA and CI. 1,019 (90.6%) and 4,232 (89.7%) of patients receiving BAHA and CI, respectively, resided in urban/suburban regions and 94 patients (8.4%) and 436 (9.2%) resided in rural regions. The median distance between residential location and the institution was 46.4 km (interquartile range [IQR], 18.9-103.6) and 44.7 km (IQR, 15.7-96.9) for BAHA and CI, respectively. From 1992 to 2021, the number of CI and BAHA performed across Ontario increased by 17 folds and 6 folds, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This large comprehensive population study provides longitudinal insight into the access to care of IHD based on geographic factors. Our findings of the present population-based study indicate an overall increase in access to devices with disproportionate access to care based on geographic locations. Further work is needed to characterize barriers to IHD access to align with demands.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The prevalence of hearing loss in Canada is high, with many patients requiring implantable hearing devices (IHDs) as treatment for their disease severity. Despite this need, many eligible patients do not pursue these interventions. The objective of this study was to examine rates of IHD based on geographic location to understand locoregional variation in access to care.

Study design: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study.

Setting: All hospitals in the Canadian province of Ontario.

Methods: Of all patients with IHD between April 1, 1992, and March 31, 2021, cochlear implants (CIs) (4,720) and bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA) (1,125) cohorts were constructed. Place of residence was categorized based on Local Health Integrated Network (LHIN). Summary statistics for place of surgical institution based on LHIN at first surgery, name of institution of first surgery and "as the crow flies" distance (in km) between place of residence and surgical institution were calculated. Rate of implantations was calculated for LHIN regions based on number of surgeries per 1,000,000 persons/years.

Results: Toronto Central, Central, Central East, and Champlain regions had >10% of patients undergoing BAHA and CI. 1,019 (90.6%) and 4,232 (89.7%) of patients receiving BAHA and CI, respectively, resided in urban/suburban regions and 94 patients (8.4%) and 436 (9.2%) resided in rural regions. The median distance between residential location and the institution was 46.4 km (interquartile range [IQR], 18.9-103.6) and 44.7 km (IQR, 15.7-96.9) for BAHA and CI, respectively. From 1992 to 2021, the number of CI and BAHA performed across Ontario increased by 17 folds and 6 folds, respectively.

Conclusion: This large comprehensive population study provides longitudinal insight into the access to care of IHD based on geographic factors. Our findings of the present population-based study indicate an overall increase in access to devices with disproportionate access to care based on geographic locations. Further work is needed to characterize barriers to IHD access to align with demands.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安省植入式听力装置:一项以人群为基础的获得护理和设备的研究。
加拿大听力损失的患病率很高,许多患者需要植入式听力装置(IHDs)作为其疾病严重程度的治疗。尽管有这种需求,但许多符合条件的患者并没有采取这些干预措施。本研究的目的是研究基于地理位置的IHD发病率,以了解在获得医疗服务方面的地方差异。研究设计:这是一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。环境:加拿大安大略省的所有医院。方法:在1992年4月1日至2021年3月31日期间的所有IHD患者中,构建了人工耳蜗(CIs)(4,720)和骨锚定助听器(BAHA)(1,125)队列。根据当地健康综合网络(Local Health Integrated Network, LHIN)对居住地进行分类。按首次手术时的LHIN、首次手术机构名称、居住地与手术机构“直线距离”(km)汇总统计手术机构所在地。根据每100万人/年的手术数量计算LHIN地区的种植率。结果:多伦多中部、中部、中东部和尚普兰地区有10%的患者接受了BAHA和CI。接受BAHA和CI治疗的患者分别有1019例(90.6%)和4232例(89.7%)居住在城市/郊区,94例(8.4%)和436例(9.2%)居住在农村地区。BAHA和CI的居住地和机构之间的中位数距离分别为46.4 km(四分位间距[IQR], 18.9-103.6)和44.7 km (IQR, 15.7-96.9)。从1992年到2021年,安大略省的CI和BAHA数量分别增长了17倍和6倍。结论:这项大型综合人口研究提供了基于地理因素的IHD患者获得护理的纵向见解。我们目前基于人群的研究结果表明,基于地理位置的不成比例的医疗保健设备的使用总体上有所增加。需要进一步的工作来确定获得IHD的障碍,以符合需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Audiology and Neuro-Otology
Audiology and Neuro-Otology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Audiology and Neurotology'' provides a forum for the publication of the most-advanced and rigorous scientific research related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal seeks submission of cutting edge research opening up new and innovative fields of study that may improve our understanding and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems, their central connections and their perception in the central nervous system. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Different Auditory Stimuli and Cognitive Tasks on Balance in Healthy Young Adults. A case series suggests peaking transimpedance as a possible marker for scalar dislocations in cochlear implantation. A Nationwide, Population-based Study of Intelligence and Hearing Loss Among 3,104,851 Adolescents. Sensorineural Hearing Loss Negatively Impacts Cognition in Older Subjects with Normal Lateral Semi-Circular Canal Function. The efficacy of a food supplement in the treatment of tinnitus with comorbid headache: A Statistical and Machine Learning analysis with a literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1