Occupational psychiatry

Samuel B. Harvey, Max Henderson
{"title":"Occupational psychiatry","authors":"Samuel B. Harvey,&nbsp;Max Henderson","doi":"10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>High rates of sickness absence and incapacity benefits constitute an increasing social and economic problem in most developed countries. Psychiatric disorders are now the leading reason for long-term sickness absence and incapacity benefits in the UK. Most of the work-associated costs of psychiatric disorder are due to common mental disorders<span> such as depression and anxiety. Psychiatric disorders can also have a marked effect on workplace performance. Individuals suffering from mental illness are stigmatized in the workplace and often excluded from the various benefits paid employment can provide. There is good evidence that being in employment is associated with better mental health, including improved self-esteem and a lower risk of suicide. There is some evidence that an employee’s perception of their workplace can be associated with an increased risk of psychiatric disorder, particularly if they perceive high job strain. It seems likely that some of this effect may be mediated via factors such as personality and individual perceptions. A good occupational history should be part of any full psychiatric assessment<span>. There is limited evidence regarding work-focused interventions for common mental disorders. The apparent lack of an occupational effect of standard treatments for depression suggests that additional specific interventions addressing return-to-work issues may be needed. There is good evidence that Individual Placement and Support (IPS) programmes are effective in helping individuals with schizophrenia find paid employment. Early detection, prompt focused management, and evidence-based rehabilitation should reduce the occupational impact of any psychiatric disorder.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":88653,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)","volume":"8 5","pages":"Pages 174-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mppsy.2009.03.011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1476179309000457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High rates of sickness absence and incapacity benefits constitute an increasing social and economic problem in most developed countries. Psychiatric disorders are now the leading reason for long-term sickness absence and incapacity benefits in the UK. Most of the work-associated costs of psychiatric disorder are due to common mental disorders such as depression and anxiety. Psychiatric disorders can also have a marked effect on workplace performance. Individuals suffering from mental illness are stigmatized in the workplace and often excluded from the various benefits paid employment can provide. There is good evidence that being in employment is associated with better mental health, including improved self-esteem and a lower risk of suicide. There is some evidence that an employee’s perception of their workplace can be associated with an increased risk of psychiatric disorder, particularly if they perceive high job strain. It seems likely that some of this effect may be mediated via factors such as personality and individual perceptions. A good occupational history should be part of any full psychiatric assessment. There is limited evidence regarding work-focused interventions for common mental disorders. The apparent lack of an occupational effect of standard treatments for depression suggests that additional specific interventions addressing return-to-work issues may be needed. There is good evidence that Individual Placement and Support (IPS) programmes are effective in helping individuals with schizophrenia find paid employment. Early detection, prompt focused management, and evidence-based rehabilitation should reduce the occupational impact of any psychiatric disorder.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职业精神病学
在大多数发达国家,疾病缺勤和丧失工作能力津贴的高比率构成了一个日益严重的社会和经济问题。精神疾病现在是英国长期疾病缺席和丧失工作能力福利的主要原因。精神障碍的大部分工作相关费用是由于常见的精神障碍,如抑郁和焦虑。精神疾病也会对工作表现产生显著影响。患有精神疾病的人在工作场所受到歧视,往往被排除在有薪就业所能提供的各种福利之外。有充分的证据表明,就业与更好的心理健康有关,包括提高自尊和降低自杀风险。有证据表明,员工对工作场所的看法可能与患精神疾病的风险增加有关,特别是如果他们感到工作压力很大的话。这种影响可能是由性格和个人认知等因素介导的。良好的职业史应该是任何全面精神评估的一部分。关于以工作为重点的干预措施治疗常见精神障碍的证据有限。抑郁症的标准治疗明显缺乏职业效应,这表明可能需要额外的具体干预措施来解决重返工作岗位的问题。有充分的证据表明,个人安置和支持(IPS)方案在帮助精神分裂症患者找到有薪工作方面是有效的。早期发现,及时集中管理和循证康复应减少任何精神疾病的职业影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial Board Mental illness, dangerousness and protecting society Personal autonomy and mental capacity The Mental Health Act and the Mental Capacity Act: untangling the relationship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1