Prolegomena

Omar Tibolla , Luke Drury
{"title":"Prolegomena","authors":"Omar Tibolla ,&nbsp;Luke Drury","doi":"10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2014.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In these preliminary remarks we discuss our motivations for holding the San Vito di Cadore conference as well as some personal reflections on the history and current status of the origin of cosmic rays. We argue that it is time to think beyond the ‘standard model’ and contemplate the possibility of sources other than SNRs contributing to the observed cosmic ray flux even if the bulk originate in SNRs. In fact everyone tacitly assumes that at the very highest energies we do in fact see a new extra-Galactic component, but what it is and where exactly the transition occurs remain subjects of investigation. Similarly the positron excess seen by PAMELA and confirmed by AMS clearly points to an additional source of high-energy leptons in our Galactic neighbourhood. The recent observation by Agile and Fermi of the remarkable Crab gamma-ray flares point to some non-standard and very rapid form of particle acceleration which, if it occurs in other environments, may contribute to the acceleration of cosmic rays. In summary, it is clear that the origin of cosmic rays is a richer field of study than just diffusive shock acceleration in SNRs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93343,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear physics. B, Proceedings, supplements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2014.10.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear physics. B, Proceedings, supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920563214001959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In these preliminary remarks we discuss our motivations for holding the San Vito di Cadore conference as well as some personal reflections on the history and current status of the origin of cosmic rays. We argue that it is time to think beyond the ‘standard model’ and contemplate the possibility of sources other than SNRs contributing to the observed cosmic ray flux even if the bulk originate in SNRs. In fact everyone tacitly assumes that at the very highest energies we do in fact see a new extra-Galactic component, but what it is and where exactly the transition occurs remain subjects of investigation. Similarly the positron excess seen by PAMELA and confirmed by AMS clearly points to an additional source of high-energy leptons in our Galactic neighbourhood. The recent observation by Agile and Fermi of the remarkable Crab gamma-ray flares point to some non-standard and very rapid form of particle acceleration which, if it occurs in other environments, may contribute to the acceleration of cosmic rays. In summary, it is clear that the origin of cosmic rays is a richer field of study than just diffusive shock acceleration in SNRs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
序言
在这些初步的评论中,我们讨论了我们举行圣维托迪卡多雷会议的动机,以及对宇宙射线起源的历史和现状的一些个人思考。我们认为,现在是时候考虑超越“标准模型”,并考虑除信噪比以外的其他来源对观测到的宇宙射线通量的可能性,即使大部分来自信噪比。事实上,每个人都默认,在最高的能量下,我们确实看到了一个新的银河系外成分,但它是什么,以及这种转变究竟发生在哪里,仍然是研究的主题。同样,PAMELA观测到的并被AMS证实的正电子过剩清楚地指出,银河系附近还有一个高能轻子的额外来源。Agile和Fermi最近对蟹状星云伽玛射线耀斑的观测指出了一些非标准的、非常快速的粒子加速形式,如果它发生在其他环境中,可能会导致宇宙射线的加速。总之,很明显,宇宙射线的起源是一个更丰富的研究领域,而不仅仅是信噪比中的扩散激波加速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial Board Author index Hybrid Simulations of Particle Acceleration at Shocks Using optical lines to study particle acceleration at supernova remnants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1