Prevalence and Characteristics of Lumbar Spondylolysis in White and Black Patients.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-22 DOI:10.1177/21925682231216107
Hiroyuki Yoshihara, Winston Yen, Evan Horowitz, Vidushan Nadarajah
{"title":"Prevalence and Characteristics of Lumbar Spondylolysis in White and Black Patients.","authors":"Hiroyuki Yoshihara, Winston Yen, Evan Horowitz, Vidushan Nadarajah","doi":"10.1177/21925682231216107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case series.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To the best of our knowledge, the prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis in white and black populations has never been studied using computed tomography (CT). The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the prevalence and characteristics of lumbar spondylolysis in white and black patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a cross sectional study. Patients aged 20-79 who underwent abdominal and pelvic CT for trauma screening in the New York City area and whose race was classified as \"white\" and \"black\" on the questionnaire were recruited to the study. A total of 1200 white patients (600 women, 600 men) and 1200 black patients (600 women, 600 men) were included for the analysis. The presence of lumbar spondylolysis, level, unilateral/bilateral, and the presence of spondylolisthesis at lumbar spondylolysis level were evaluated using CT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis was 3.0% (n = 36) for white patients and .8% (n = 10) for black patients, with 3.3% (n = 20) and 1.0% (n = 6) for white and black females, respectively; and 2.7% (n = 16) and .7% (n = 4) for white and black males, respectively. The prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis was significantly higher in white patients compared with that in black patients (<i>P</i> < .0001). Lumbar spondylolysis was at L5 in 44/46 patients (95.7%) and bilateral in 41/46 patients (89.1%). Spondylolisthesis at lumbar spondylolysis level was found in 40/46 patients (87.0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis was 3.0% for white patients and .8% for black patients. The prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis was significantly higher in white patients compared with that in black patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"916-920"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11881154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231216107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective case series.

Objective: To the best of our knowledge, the prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis in white and black populations has never been studied using computed tomography (CT). The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the prevalence and characteristics of lumbar spondylolysis in white and black patients.

Methods: This study is a cross sectional study. Patients aged 20-79 who underwent abdominal and pelvic CT for trauma screening in the New York City area and whose race was classified as "white" and "black" on the questionnaire were recruited to the study. A total of 1200 white patients (600 women, 600 men) and 1200 black patients (600 women, 600 men) were included for the analysis. The presence of lumbar spondylolysis, level, unilateral/bilateral, and the presence of spondylolisthesis at lumbar spondylolysis level were evaluated using CT.

Results: The prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis was 3.0% (n = 36) for white patients and .8% (n = 10) for black patients, with 3.3% (n = 20) and 1.0% (n = 6) for white and black females, respectively; and 2.7% (n = 16) and .7% (n = 4) for white and black males, respectively. The prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis was significantly higher in white patients compared with that in black patients (P < .0001). Lumbar spondylolysis was at L5 in 44/46 patients (95.7%) and bilateral in 41/46 patients (89.1%). Spondylolisthesis at lumbar spondylolysis level was found in 40/46 patients (87.0%).

Conclusions: The prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis was 3.0% for white patients and .8% for black patients. The prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis was significantly higher in white patients compared with that in black patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
白人和黑人患者腰椎峡部裂的患病率和特点。
研究设计:回顾性病例系列。目的:据我们所知,从未使用计算机断层扫描(CT)研究过白人和黑人人群腰椎峡部裂的患病率。本研究的目的是检查和比较白人和黑人患者腰椎峡部裂的患病率和特征。方法:本研究为横断面研究。研究招募了年龄在20-79岁之间,在纽约市地区接受腹部和骨盆CT进行创伤筛查的患者,他们的种族在问卷上被划分为“白人”和“黑人”。共有1200名白人患者(600名女性,600名男性)和1200名黑人患者(600名女性,600名男性)被纳入分析。使用CT评估腰椎滑脱的存在、水平、单侧/双侧以及腰椎滑脱水平是否存在。结果:白人患者腰椎峡部裂的患病率为3.0% (n = 36),黑人患者为0.8% (n = 10),白人和黑人女性分别为3.3% (n = 20)和1.0% (n = 6);白人和黑人男性分别为2.7% (n = 16)和0.7% (n = 4)。白人患者腰椎峡部裂的患病率明显高于黑人患者(P < 0.0001)。44/46例(95.7%)腰椎峡裂发生在L5, 41/46例(89.1%)发生在双侧。46例患者中有40例(87.0%)出现腰椎滑脱。结论:白人患者腰椎峡部裂的患病率为3.0%,黑人患者为0.8%。白人患者腰椎峡部裂的患病率明显高于黑人患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Spinal Pathologies Associated With Loeys-Dietz Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Insights From the AO Spine Knowledge Forum Tumor Registries: Advancing the Understanding and Management of Primary Spine Tumors Through International Multicentric Collaboration. A Narrative Review. Incidence, Clinical Characteristics, Treatment and Outcomes of Intracardiac Cement Embolism After Vertebral Augmentation: A Systematic Review. AI-Assisted, Literature-Informed Development and Retrospective Validation of a Point-Based Surgical Site Infection Risk Calculator for Spine Surgery. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use Does Not Impact Spine Surgery Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1