Carpal tunnel syndrome and nerve conduction studies in fibromyalgia patients.

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-23 Print Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.2478/rjim-2023-0031
Gülseren Demir Karakiliç, Güven Arslan
{"title":"Carpal tunnel syndrome and nerve conduction studies in fibromyalgia patients.","authors":"Gülseren Demir Karakiliç, Güven Arslan","doi":"10.2478/rjim-2023-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate ENMG results of female patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS) with a preliminary diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and to examine whether there are differences in ENMG results compared to control group.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Ethical approval was obtained for this study on 30.12.2022 with number E. Kurul-2022-20/32 and recorded retrospectively between January 2021 and January 2023. 201 female patients who were diagnosed with FMS in Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation polyclinic and who were requested to have ENMG testing with a preliminary diagnosis of CTS were included in study as patient group. 201 patients were ıncluded as control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While the number of patients with right CTS was 39 (25.49%) in the FMS group, the number of patients with right CTS was 38 (24.20%) in control group. While the number of patients with left CTS was 34 (25%) in the FMS group, number of patients with left CTS in the control group was 36 (24.65%). When we analyzed a total of 592 ENMG results in our study, we found a high normal ENMG rate of 75%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that there was no difference between the FMS and the control group in terms of compatibility between the pre-diagnosis and electroneurophysiological diagnosis in the ENMG results requested with the pre-diagnosis of CTS in our study. The ENMG examination should be requested for right patient in right indication, by first evaluating the patient well.</p>","PeriodicalId":21463,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"61-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rjim-2023-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study is to evaluate ENMG results of female patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS) with a preliminary diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and to examine whether there are differences in ENMG results compared to control group.

Material and methods: Ethical approval was obtained for this study on 30.12.2022 with number E. Kurul-2022-20/32 and recorded retrospectively between January 2021 and January 2023. 201 female patients who were diagnosed with FMS in Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation polyclinic and who were requested to have ENMG testing with a preliminary diagnosis of CTS were included in study as patient group. 201 patients were ıncluded as control group.

Results: While the number of patients with right CTS was 39 (25.49%) in the FMS group, the number of patients with right CTS was 38 (24.20%) in control group. While the number of patients with left CTS was 34 (25%) in the FMS group, number of patients with left CTS in the control group was 36 (24.65%). When we analyzed a total of 592 ENMG results in our study, we found a high normal ENMG rate of 75%.

Conclusion: We found that there was no difference between the FMS and the control group in terms of compatibility between the pre-diagnosis and electroneurophysiological diagnosis in the ENMG results requested with the pre-diagnosis of CTS in our study. The ENMG examination should be requested for right patient in right indication, by first evaluating the patient well.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纤维肌痛患者腕管综合征和神经传导的研究。
简介:本研究旨在评价初步诊断为腕管综合征(CTS)的女性纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)患者的ENMG结果,并探讨其与对照组的ENMG结果是否存在差异。材料和方法:本研究于2022年12月30日获得伦理批准,编号E. Kurul-2022-20/32,回顾性记录时间为2021年1月至2023年1月。选取201例在物理治疗与康复综合诊所确诊为FMS的女性患者,并要求进行初步诊断为CTS的ENMG检测作为患者组。201例患者ıncluded为对照组。结果:FMS组右侧CTS 39例(25.49%),对照组右侧CTS 38例(24.20%)。FMS组左侧CTS 34例(25%),对照组左侧CTS 36例(24.65%)。当我们对592例ENMG结果进行分析时,我们发现ENMG正常率高达75%。结论:我们发现FMS与对照组在CTS预诊断所要求的ENMG结果的预诊断与神经电生理诊断的相容性方面没有差异。应首先对患者进行评估,并在正确的适应症下对患者进行ENMG检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine
Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
35
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Romanian Journal of Physics is a journal publishing physics contributions on the following themes: •Theoretical Physics & Applied Mathematics •Nuclear Physics •Solid State Physics & Materials Science •Statistical Physics & Quantum Mechanics •Optics •Spectroscopy •Plasma & Lasers •Nuclear & Elementary Particles Physics •Atomic and Molecular Physics •Astrophysics •Atmosphere and Earth Science •Environment Protection
期刊最新文献
Impact of Smoking on MicroRNAs in Significant Coronary Artery Disease. Capillaroscopic Insights: Exploring the Connection Between Microvascular Changes and Pulmonary Manifestations in Systemic Sclerosis. Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: What Is the Actual Risk of Chronic Kidney Disease? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Evaluation of different scoring systems for repeating Transarterial Chemoembolization in Egyptian patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Fabry disease phenotyping in women from the complete Romanian cohort - time for early diagnostic awareness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1