Effect of nicotine corrective messaging on nicotine-related beliefs in US adults: a randomised controlled trial.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Tobacco Control Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1136/tc-2023-058252
Andrea C Villanti, Catherine Peasley-Miklus, Melissa Mercincavage, Darren Mays, Eric C Donny, Joseph N Cappella, Andrew A Strasser
{"title":"Effect of nicotine corrective messaging on nicotine-related beliefs in US adults: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Andrea C Villanti, Catherine Peasley-Miklus, Melissa Mercincavage, Darren Mays, Eric C Donny, Joseph N Cappella, Andrew A Strasser","doi":"10.1136/tc-2023-058252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Widespread misperceptions of the health risks of nicotine could undermine the public health benefits of the Food and Drug Administration's actions, including modified risk tobacco product authorisations and a reduced nicotine product standard for cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>794 US adults (aged 18+) in NORC's AmeriSpeak panel participated in a randomised controlled trial in Spring 2021 to test the effect of three exposures to eight nicotine corrective messages (NCM) on beliefs about nicotine, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), e-cigarettes and reduced nicotine content (RNC) cigarettes at 3-month follow-up. Analyses conducted in 2022 examined the effect of study condition (NCM (n=393) vs no message control (n=401)) on nicotine beliefs, use intentions and use of nicotine and tobacco products.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exposure to three NCM doses reduced nicotine (b=-0.33; 95% CI -0.60, -0.07), NRT (b=-0.49; 95% CI -0.85, -0.14), e-cigarette (b=-0.32; 95% CI -0.59, -0.05) and RNC cigarette false beliefs (b=-0.64; 95% CI -1.26, -0.02) compared with the control, controlling for baseline beliefs. Baseline tobacco use and concern about nicotine addiction attenuated intervention effects on false beliefs about RNC cigarettes. There were few intervention effects on intention or use of nicotine and tobacco products.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Repeated exposure to NCM was necessary to reduce false beliefs about nicotine and tobacco products. Future studies will improve understanding of the dose and duration of nicotine education needed to shift intentions and behaviour, as well as tailored content for tobacco product users to achieve similar reductions in false beliefs as non-users.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04805515.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":" ","pages":"162-168"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12015006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2023-058252","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Widespread misperceptions of the health risks of nicotine could undermine the public health benefits of the Food and Drug Administration's actions, including modified risk tobacco product authorisations and a reduced nicotine product standard for cigarettes.

Methods: 794 US adults (aged 18+) in NORC's AmeriSpeak panel participated in a randomised controlled trial in Spring 2021 to test the effect of three exposures to eight nicotine corrective messages (NCM) on beliefs about nicotine, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), e-cigarettes and reduced nicotine content (RNC) cigarettes at 3-month follow-up. Analyses conducted in 2022 examined the effect of study condition (NCM (n=393) vs no message control (n=401)) on nicotine beliefs, use intentions and use of nicotine and tobacco products.

Results: Exposure to three NCM doses reduced nicotine (b=-0.33; 95% CI -0.60, -0.07), NRT (b=-0.49; 95% CI -0.85, -0.14), e-cigarette (b=-0.32; 95% CI -0.59, -0.05) and RNC cigarette false beliefs (b=-0.64; 95% CI -1.26, -0.02) compared with the control, controlling for baseline beliefs. Baseline tobacco use and concern about nicotine addiction attenuated intervention effects on false beliefs about RNC cigarettes. There were few intervention effects on intention or use of nicotine and tobacco products.

Conclusions: Repeated exposure to NCM was necessary to reduce false beliefs about nicotine and tobacco products. Future studies will improve understanding of the dose and duration of nicotine education needed to shift intentions and behaviour, as well as tailored content for tobacco product users to achieve similar reductions in false beliefs as non-users.

Trial registration number: NCT04805515.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼古丁纠正信息对美国成年人尼古丁相关信念的影响:一项随机对照试验。
导言:对尼古丁健康风险的普遍误解可能会破坏食品和药物管理局行动的公共卫生效益,包括修改风险烟草产品授权和降低香烟尼古丁产品标准。方法:2021年春季,NORC AmeriSpeak小组的794名美国成年人(18岁以上)参加了一项随机对照试验,在3个月的随访中,测试三次接触8种尼古丁纠正信息(NCM)对尼古丁、尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)、电子烟和低尼古丁含量(RNC)香烟的影响。2022年进行的分析检查了研究条件(NCM (n=393) vs无信息控制(n=401))对尼古丁信念、使用意图以及尼古丁和烟草制品使用的影响。结果:暴露于三个NCM剂量的尼古丁减少(b=-0.33;95% CI -0.60, -0.07), NRT (b=-0.49;95% CI -0.85, -0.14),电子烟(b=-0.32;95% CI -0.59, -0.05)和RNC香烟错误信念(b=-0.64;95% CI -1.26, -0.02)与对照组相比,控制基线信念。基线烟草使用和对尼古丁成瘾的关注减弱了干预对RNC香烟错误信念的影响。对尼古丁和烟草制品的意图或使用几乎没有干预效果。结论:反复接触NCM对减少对尼古丁和烟草制品的错误认知是必要的。未来的研究将提高对改变意图和行为所需的尼古丁教育的剂量和持续时间的理解,以及为烟草制品使用者量身定制的内容,以实现与非使用者相似的减少错误信念。试验注册号:NCT04805515。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
期刊最新文献
Effects of menthol cigarette and e-cigarette flavour restrictions on tobacco product purchasing: insights from the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace. What is the best tobacco control policy in Tuscany? An assessment using uncertainty analysis. Forecasting the effects of smoking prevalence scenarios on health and economic burdens in China from 2022 to 2040. South Africa's illicit cigarette crisis: evidence from the 2021 Global Adult Tobacco Survey. Registered tobacco and vaping lobbying activity in Ireland, 2016-2024: the case for strengthening implementation of the Framework Convention of Tobacco Control Article 5.3 to clear the path for tobacco endgame.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1