The Perceived Intersection of Parenting and Physician Assistant Training Among Current Physician Assistant Students.

Q2 Health Professions Journal of Physician Assistant Education Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-21 DOI:10.1097/JPA.0000000000000566
Stephanie Neary, Nöel E Smith, Derek C Henderson, Mary Ruggeri
{"title":"The Perceived Intersection of Parenting and Physician Assistant Training Among Current Physician Assistant Students.","authors":"Stephanie Neary, Nöel E Smith, Derek C Henderson, Mary Ruggeri","doi":"10.1097/JPA.0000000000000566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite recent advancements in policies supporting pregnancy and parenting-related resources for physician assistant (PA) students, there remains a paucity of data on the perceptions of family planning or available resources during training. The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of support for, and impact on, family planning and parenting, including lactation, among PA students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used data collected from the American Academy of Physician Associates Student Survey between January and March 2023. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 557 students (557/1353; 41.2%) completed the survey. Less than 15% of students (14.4%) believed their program provides resources to support parental leave, and many students (52.1%) remained unsure whether resources exist(ed). There was a significant difference for PA students ( P = .005) by gender in whether family planning affected the decision to pursue PA training over another profession, with female students proportionately affected more than male students. Medical school was the most often considered aside from PA training. Most PA students (311/548; 56.8%) also felt pressure to wait until after training to have children. In addition, multiple students (26/554; 4.7%) admitted to being asked questions they believed were biased or inappropriate regarding pregnancy or parenting during the interview process for, or after beginning, PA school.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Programs should seek opportunities to support students through all stages of family planning. Support will require both cultural and structural shifts beginning with peer stigma and extending through admissions interview question audits, faculty training, university policies, and accreditation requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":39231,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physician Assistant Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite recent advancements in policies supporting pregnancy and parenting-related resources for physician assistant (PA) students, there remains a paucity of data on the perceptions of family planning or available resources during training. The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions of support for, and impact on, family planning and parenting, including lactation, among PA students.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used data collected from the American Academy of Physician Associates Student Survey between January and March 2023. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed.

Results: A total of 557 students (557/1353; 41.2%) completed the survey. Less than 15% of students (14.4%) believed their program provides resources to support parental leave, and many students (52.1%) remained unsure whether resources exist(ed). There was a significant difference for PA students ( P = .005) by gender in whether family planning affected the decision to pursue PA training over another profession, with female students proportionately affected more than male students. Medical school was the most often considered aside from PA training. Most PA students (311/548; 56.8%) also felt pressure to wait until after training to have children. In addition, multiple students (26/554; 4.7%) admitted to being asked questions they believed were biased or inappropriate regarding pregnancy or parenting during the interview process for, or after beginning, PA school.

Discussion: Programs should seek opportunities to support students through all stages of family planning. Support will require both cultural and structural shifts beginning with peer stigma and extending through admissions interview question audits, faculty training, university policies, and accreditation requirements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当前医师助理学生对父母教养与医师助理训练的交集认知。
目的:尽管最近在支持医师助理(PA)学生怀孕和育儿相关资源的政策方面取得了进展,但关于计划生育观念或培训期间可用资源的数据仍然缺乏。本研究的目的是探讨对计划生育和育儿,包括哺乳的支持和影响的看法,在PA学生。方法:本横断面研究使用了2023年1月至3月期间美国医师协会学生调查的数据。进行描述性和推断性统计。结果:共557名学生(557/1353;41.2%)完成调查。不到15%的学生(14.4%)认为他们的项目提供了支持产假的资源,许多学生(52.1%)仍然不确定资源是否存在(ed)。在计划生育是否会影响个人护理专业学生选择其他专业的决定方面,性别差异显著(P = 0.005),女学生比男学生受影响的比例更大。除了私人助理培训,医学院是最常被考虑的。大多数PA学生(311/548;56.8%)也有压力要等到训练结束后再生孩子。此外,多名学生(26/554;(4.7%)承认,在私人助理学校的面试过程中或入学后,他们被问及有关怀孕或育儿的问题,他们认为这些问题有偏见或不恰当。结论:项目应该寻求机会支持学生在计划生育的各个阶段。支持将需要文化和结构上的转变,从同伴耻辱开始,延伸到招生面试问题审计、教师培训、大学政策和认证要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
期刊最新文献
Using Four-Component Instructional Design to Create an Interactive Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum for Physician Associate Students. Strengthening the Multiple-Choice Assessment: Improving Item-Writing Skills of Physician Assistant Educators. Physician Assistant Training, Collaboration, and Practice Act Legislation: Perspectives From Practicing Physician Assistants. Compliance With Accreditation Standards on Diversity: Is Institutional Support the Missing Link? Viewing Medical Education Through the Lens of Second Language Acquisition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1