Patients' experience with German primary care practices during Covid-19: an interview study.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-04-25 Print Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0129
Daniel Otto, Veronika van der Wardt
{"title":"Patients' experience with German primary care practices during Covid-19: an interview study.","authors":"Daniel Otto, Veronika van der Wardt","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient access to and communication with German primary care practices (PCPs) changed due to Covid-19. Patients had to comply with Covid-19 regulations, which included closed waiting rooms and appointment-based consultations. It is unclear how patients experienced these changes and how the pandemic impacted their primary care attendance.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to explore how patients, who frequently attended PCPs before the pandemic, perceived primary care during the initial phase of Covid-19 in Germany.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Between January and June 2021, we completed 17 semi-structured interviews. Participants included primary care patients from two regions in Germany who frequently attended their physician before the start of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were analysed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four interconnected themes emerged in the analysis: 'fear of COVID-19 infection', 'practice organisation', 'information about COVID-19', and 'telemedicine'. Participants were unconcerned about being infected in their practice and mostly agreed with COVID-19 regulations, although waiting outside for their appointment was uncomfortable for some. Participants consulted their primary care physician in relation to different vaccines but felt they were sufficiently informed regarding general information about COVID-19. Views on telemedicine, which was mostly understood as contact via telephone or video call, differed widely, with some participants being very accepting and interested, while others dismissed telemedicine categorically.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants regarded the new COVID-19 regulations as sensible. Telemedicine using telephone or video call consultations should be further explored under the assumption that this would be acceptable for some but not all patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11169969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient access to and communication with German primary care practices (PCPs) changed due to Covid-19. Patients had to comply with Covid-19 regulations, which included closed waiting rooms and appointment-based consultations. It is unclear how patients experienced these changes and how the pandemic impacted their primary care attendance.

Aim: The aim of the study was to explore how patients, who frequently attended PCPs before the pandemic, perceived primary care during the initial phase of Covid-19 in Germany.

Design & setting: Between January and June 2021, we completed 17 semi-structured interviews. Participants included primary care patients from two regions in Germany who frequently attended their physician before the start of the pandemic.

Method: Data were analysed using content analysis.

Results: Four interconnected themes emerged in the analysis: 'fear of COVID-19 infection', 'practice organisation', 'information about COVID-19', and 'telemedicine'. Participants were unconcerned about being infected in their practice and mostly agreed with COVID-19 regulations, although waiting outside for their appointment was uncomfortable for some. Participants consulted their primary care physician in relation to different vaccines but felt they were sufficiently informed regarding general information about COVID-19. Views on telemedicine, which was mostly understood as contact via telephone or video call, differed widely, with some participants being very accepting and interested, while others dismissed telemedicine categorically.

Conclusion: Participants regarded the new COVID-19 regulations as sensible. Telemedicine using telephone or video call consultations should be further explored under the assumption that this would be acceptable for some but not all patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Covid-19期间患者在德国初级保健实践中的经历:一项访谈研究
背景:由于Covid-19,与德国初级保健实践的获取和沟通发生了变化。患者必须遵守Covid-19法规,其中包括封闭的候诊室和预约咨询。目前尚不清楚患者如何经历这些变化,以及大流行如何影响他们的初级保健就诊。目的:该研究的目的是探讨在大流行之前经常参加初级保健实践的患者在德国Covid-19的初始阶段如何看待初级保健。设计与设置:在2021年1月至6月期间,我们完成了17次半结构化访谈。参与者包括来自德国两个地区的初级保健患者,他们在大流行开始前经常去看医生。方法:采用内容分析法对资料进行分析。结果:分析中出现了四个相互关联的主题:“对Covid-19感染的恐惧”、“实践组织”、“关于Covid-19的信息”和“远程医疗”。参与者不担心在实践中被感染,大多数人都同意Covid-19法规,尽管在外面等待预约对一些人来说很不舒服。参与者就不同的疫苗咨询了他们的初级保健医生,但认为他们已经充分了解了有关Covid-19的一般信息。远程医疗主要被理解为通过电话或视频通话进行接触,对远程医疗的看法分歧很大,一些与会者非常接受和感兴趣,而另一些与会者则断然拒绝远程医疗。结论:与会者认为新规是合理的。应进一步探索使用电话或视频通话咨询的远程医疗,假设这对一些但不是所有患者都可以接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Correction: Exploring the facilitators and barriers to addressing social media's impact on anxiety within primary care: a qualitative study. Action on elevated natriuretic peptide in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Identifying where hospital and community trusts are managing general practices in England: a service mapping study. 'ThinkCancer!': randomised feasibility trial of a novel practice-based early cancer diagnosis intervention. Signs and symptoms of serious illness in adults with acute abdominal pain presenting to ambulatory care: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1