Comprehensive Physical Work Capacity Evaluations for Korean Farmers Assessed in Healthy Volunteers.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-20 DOI:10.5535/arm.23055
Seungsu Jeong, Gowun Kim, Hee-Won Park, Sora Baek
{"title":"Comprehensive Physical Work Capacity Evaluations for Korean Farmers Assessed in Healthy Volunteers.","authors":"Seungsu Jeong, Gowun Kim, Hee-Won Park, Sora Baek","doi":"10.5535/arm.23055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To establish the lower limits of normative values of the physical work capacity for Korean farmers in healthy working individual.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a comprehensive set of physical work capacity evaluation items that encompass common farming tasks. These items include measurements of trunk flexion/extension angles, strength (hand grip, trunk flexion/extension, leg/back lifting, and pushing/pulling), and positional tolerances. We calculated the normative values for the items and defined the normal range in 124 healthy volunteers aged 20-79 years. We calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to validate the test-retest reliability of the measurements protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The normal values for each measurement item were as follows: trunk flexion and extension angle (65.3°±11.6° and 29.6°±6.6°), dominant hand grip strength (32.2±10.5 kgf), trunk flexion and extension strength (288.4±119.0 N and 297.3±129.9 N), leg and back lifting strength (452.9±233.5 N and 349.2±166.7 N), pushing and pulling strength (214.7±75.1 N and 221.7±63.3 N), and positional tolerance time (squat: 76.8±9.0 seconds, front: 73.8±7.7 seconds, twist: 82.2±8.8 seconds, upward: 71.9±11.3 seconds). Regarding test-retest reliability, all strength measurements demonstrated excellent absolute agreement (ICC, 0.91-0.96). However, positional tolerance showed poor-to-moderate absolute agreement (ICC, 0.37-0.58).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conducted measurements of muscle strength and positional tolerance in healthy participants of various ages, focusing on tasks commonly performed by Korean farmers. The outcomes hold significant value as they offer a pertinent instrument for assessing the appropriateness of workers, thereby carrying implications for rehabilitation objectives, legal evaluations, and work capacity assessments within the agricultural domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":47738,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","volume":" ","pages":"468-482"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10767214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine-ARM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.23055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To establish the lower limits of normative values of the physical work capacity for Korean farmers in healthy working individual.

Methods: We developed a comprehensive set of physical work capacity evaluation items that encompass common farming tasks. These items include measurements of trunk flexion/extension angles, strength (hand grip, trunk flexion/extension, leg/back lifting, and pushing/pulling), and positional tolerances. We calculated the normative values for the items and defined the normal range in 124 healthy volunteers aged 20-79 years. We calculated the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to validate the test-retest reliability of the measurements protocol.

Results: The normal values for each measurement item were as follows: trunk flexion and extension angle (65.3°±11.6° and 29.6°±6.6°), dominant hand grip strength (32.2±10.5 kgf), trunk flexion and extension strength (288.4±119.0 N and 297.3±129.9 N), leg and back lifting strength (452.9±233.5 N and 349.2±166.7 N), pushing and pulling strength (214.7±75.1 N and 221.7±63.3 N), and positional tolerance time (squat: 76.8±9.0 seconds, front: 73.8±7.7 seconds, twist: 82.2±8.8 seconds, upward: 71.9±11.3 seconds). Regarding test-retest reliability, all strength measurements demonstrated excellent absolute agreement (ICC, 0.91-0.96). However, positional tolerance showed poor-to-moderate absolute agreement (ICC, 0.37-0.58).

Conclusion: We conducted measurements of muscle strength and positional tolerance in healthy participants of various ages, focusing on tasks commonly performed by Korean farmers. The outcomes hold significant value as they offer a pertinent instrument for assessing the appropriateness of workers, thereby carrying implications for rehabilitation objectives, legal evaluations, and work capacity assessments within the agricultural domain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康志愿者韩国农民综合体力劳动能力评价
目的:建立健康劳动个体朝鲜族农民体力劳动能力标准值下限。方法:我们开发了一套全面的体力劳动能力评估项目,包括常见的农业任务。这些项目包括躯干弯曲/伸展角度的测量,力量(手握,躯干弯曲/伸展,腿/背部抬起,推/拉)和位置公差。我们对124名年龄在20-79岁的健康志愿者计算了各项的正常值,并确定了正常范围。我们计算了类内相关系数(ICC)来验证测量方案的重测信度。结果:各测量项目的正常值为:躯干屈伸角(65.3°±11.6°和29.6°±6.6°)、优势手握力(32.2±10.5 kgf)、躯干屈伸力(288.4±119.0 N和297.3±129.9 N)、腿和背部举力(452.9±233.5 N和349.2±166.7 N)、推拉力(214.7±75.1 N和221.7±63.3 N)、位置容忍时间(深蹲:76.8±9.0秒、前蹲:73.8±7.7秒、扭转:82.2±8.8秒、向上:71.9±11.3秒)。关于重测信度,所有强度测量结果都显示出极好的绝对一致性(ICC, 0.91-0.96)。然而,位置公差显示出较差至中等的绝对一致性(ICC, 0.37-0.58)。结论:我们对不同年龄的健康参与者的肌肉力量和位置耐受性进行了测量,重点关注韩国农民通常执行的任务。研究结果具有重要价值,因为它们为评估工人的适宜性提供了相关工具,从而对农业领域的康复目标、法律评估和工作能力评估产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
32
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Factors Affecting Life Satisfaction Among People With Physical Disabilities During COVID-19: Observational Evidence from a Korean Cohort Study. Motor Function Measurement in Children: Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM). Coexistence of Non-Lower Body Mass Index and Exercise Habits Reduce Readmission in Older Patients With Heart Failure. Change in Plantar Pressure and Plain Radiography in Pediatric Flexible Flatfoot: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Cross-Cultural Translation and Validation of the Thai Version of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA-TH).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1