Objective and subjective evaluation of walking ability with and without the use of a passive brace for hip flexor muscles in individuals with multiple sclerosis.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Prosthetics and Orthotics International Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-22 DOI:10.1097/PXR.0000000000000299
Valeria Prada, Erica Grange, Caterina Sgarito, Elisabetta Pedrazzoli, Giovanna Konrad, Rachele Di Giovanni, Giampaolo Brichetto, Claudio Solaro
{"title":"Objective and subjective evaluation of walking ability with and without the use of a passive brace for hip flexor muscles in individuals with multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Valeria Prada, Erica Grange, Caterina Sgarito, Elisabetta Pedrazzoli, Giovanna Konrad, Rachele Di Giovanni, Giampaolo Brichetto, Claudio Solaro","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects the cognitive and motor domains. Muscle weakness often leads to abnormal gait. Several solutions are rising, including the use of passive exoskeletons.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of a first-ever use of a passive exoskeleton on walking ability in people with MS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 50 persons with MS. All subjects were assessed using the 2-min walking test, the timed 25-foot walk test, and a two-stage rate of perceived exertion (RPE) without the exoskeleton (T0) and with the exoskeleton (T1).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data showed a significant decrease in walking endurance while the exoskeleton is worn (2-min walking test: T0: 65.19 ± 23.37 m; T1: 59.40 ± 22.99; p < 0.0001) and a not significant difference in walking speed on a shortened distance (T0: 15.71 ± 10.30 s; T1: 15.73 ± 11.86 s; p = 0.25). No significant differences were also found for the effort perception scale (RPE: T0: 13.24 ± 3.01; T1: 13.60 ± 2.9; p = 0.3). Seventy-two percent of subjects reported a positive or neutral global perceived effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The exoskeleton does not add any fatiguing or negative effects. Although the walking performance decreases, the overall perception of the subjects is positive. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of the exoskeleton on gait quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":"672-676"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) affects the cognitive and motor domains. Muscle weakness often leads to abnormal gait. Several solutions are rising, including the use of passive exoskeletons.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of a first-ever use of a passive exoskeleton on walking ability in people with MS.

Methods: We recruited 50 persons with MS. All subjects were assessed using the 2-min walking test, the timed 25-foot walk test, and a two-stage rate of perceived exertion (RPE) without the exoskeleton (T0) and with the exoskeleton (T1).

Results: The data showed a significant decrease in walking endurance while the exoskeleton is worn (2-min walking test: T0: 65.19 ± 23.37 m; T1: 59.40 ± 22.99; p < 0.0001) and a not significant difference in walking speed on a shortened distance (T0: 15.71 ± 10.30 s; T1: 15.73 ± 11.86 s; p = 0.25). No significant differences were also found for the effort perception scale (RPE: T0: 13.24 ± 3.01; T1: 13.60 ± 2.9; p = 0.3). Seventy-two percent of subjects reported a positive or neutral global perceived effect.

Conclusions: The exoskeleton does not add any fatiguing or negative effects. Although the walking performance decreases, the overall perception of the subjects is positive. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of the exoskeleton on gait quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对多发性硬化症患者髋屈肌使用被动支具和不使用被动支具的行走能力进行客观和主观评价。
背景:多发性硬化症(MS)影响认知和运动领域。肌肉无力常导致步态异常。一些解决方案正在兴起,包括被动外骨骼的使用。目的:本研究的目的是评估首次使用被动式外骨骼对ms患者行走能力的影响。方法:我们招募了50名ms患者,所有受试者都使用2分钟步行测试、25英尺计时步行测试和两阶段感知运动率(RPE)进行评估,RPE是不带外骨骼(T0)和带外骨骼(T1)的。结果:数据显示,佩戴外骨骼时,行走耐力明显下降(2分钟步行测试:T0: 65.19±23.37 m;T1: 59.40±22.99;p < 0.0001),短距离步行速度差异不显著(T0: 15.71±10.30 s;T1: 15.73±11.86 s;P = 0.25)。努力知觉量表(RPE: T0: 13.24±3.01;T1: 13.60±2.9;P = 0.3)。72%的受试者报告了积极或中性的整体感知效应。结论:外骨骼不增加任何疲劳或负面影响。虽然行走表现下降,但受试者的整体感知是积极的。需要进一步的研究来评估外骨骼对步态质量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
期刊最新文献
Returning to work after dysvascular lower limb amputation-A novel multivariate approach to examine relative contributions of biopsychosocial predictors. Biomechanical effects of foot orthoses on jump landing performance: A systematic review. Which factors may influence medium-term quality of life of patients with lower-limb loss? A systematic review of the literature. What are relevant predictors of physical activity in older adults with lower limb loss (LLL)? Results of a retrospective analysis. A scoping review on upper extremity prostheses: Satisfaction, barriers, and their implications in resource-limited countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1