Estimating the Impact of Hospice Care on Key Patient-Family Care Outcomes Using a Nationwide U.S. Probability Sample.

IF 1.4 The American journal of hospice & palliative care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-21 DOI:10.1177/10499091231218261
John G Cagle, Peiyuan Zhang, Sarah Clem
{"title":"Estimating the Impact of Hospice Care on Key Patient-Family Care Outcomes Using a Nationwide U.S. Probability Sample.","authors":"John G Cagle, Peiyuan Zhang, Sarah Clem","doi":"10.1177/10499091231218261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hospice is touted as an exemplary model for end-of-life care. However, there is little generalizable evidence estimating benefits of hospice at the national level. Using a national population-based probability sample of U.S. adults with weights applied (data collected Spring/Summer 2015), we conducted six logistic regression models to evaluate linkages between hospice involvement and end-of-life outcomes (pain, home death, presence of family, access to life-prolonging care, respect for spiritual/religious beliefs, financial burden) from N = 235 informal caregivers of decedents prior to death. Respondents were M = 55 years old (SD = 17), 55% female, 77% White, 91% non-Hispanic, and 71% had cared for a hospice recipient. In fully adjusted analyses, hospice users had better reported outcomes observed in two models: (a.) presence of family/friends at death (OR = 2.82, SE = .48, <i>P</i> < .05), and (b.) respect for spiritual/religious beliefs (OR = 9.52, SE = .73, <i>P</i> < .01). Hospice utilization was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> > .05) in all other adjusted models. Although more research is needed, findings support claims that hospice remains a high quality option for end-of-life care in the U.S.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"978-986"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091231218261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hospice is touted as an exemplary model for end-of-life care. However, there is little generalizable evidence estimating benefits of hospice at the national level. Using a national population-based probability sample of U.S. adults with weights applied (data collected Spring/Summer 2015), we conducted six logistic regression models to evaluate linkages between hospice involvement and end-of-life outcomes (pain, home death, presence of family, access to life-prolonging care, respect for spiritual/religious beliefs, financial burden) from N = 235 informal caregivers of decedents prior to death. Respondents were M = 55 years old (SD = 17), 55% female, 77% White, 91% non-Hispanic, and 71% had cared for a hospice recipient. In fully adjusted analyses, hospice users had better reported outcomes observed in two models: (a.) presence of family/friends at death (OR = 2.82, SE = .48, P < .05), and (b.) respect for spiritual/religious beliefs (OR = 9.52, SE = .73, P < .01). Hospice utilization was not statistically significant (P > .05) in all other adjusted models. Although more research is needed, findings support claims that hospice remains a high quality option for end-of-life care in the U.S.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估计安宁疗护对关键病人-家庭疗护结果的影响,使用美国全国的概率样本。
临终关怀被吹捧为临终关怀的典范。然而,在国家层面上,很少有可概括的证据来评估安宁疗护的好处。我们使用基于全国人口的美国成年人概率样本(数据收集于2015年春夏),采用六个逻辑回归模型来评估临终关怀参与与临终结果(疼痛、家庭死亡、家人在场、获得延长生命的护理、对精神/宗教信仰的尊重、经济负担)之间的联系,这些数据来自N = 235名死者生前的非正式照护者。受访者年龄为M = 55岁(SD = 17), 55%为女性,77%为白人,91%为非西班牙裔,71%曾照顾过临终关怀接受者。在完全调整后的分析中,安宁疗护使用者在两个模型中观察到较好的结果:(a)死亡时家人/朋友的存在(OR = 2.82, SE = 0.48, P < 0.05)和(b)对精神/宗教信仰的尊重(OR = 9.52, SE = 0.73, P < 0.01)。其他调整后的模型中,安宁疗护使用率差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。虽然还需要更多的研究,但研究结果支持了临终关怀仍然是美国临终关怀的高质量选择的说法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Use of a Prayer Tree to Support the Emotional and Spiritual Needs of Visitors to Critical Care Units in the Deep South Region of the United States. Advance Care Planning Completion and Decision-Making Among Older Adults With Cancer and Their Family Caregivers: Findings From a Mixed Methods Study. The Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Advance Care Planning and Healthcare Utilization in People With ALS. Factors Determining Home Death Among Older Adults in Thailand. The Perspectives of Older People With HIV (OPWH) on Advance Care Planning (ACP): A Qualitative Study in Primary Care Clinics in Kuala Lumpur.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1