Who Gets Credit? Citizen Responses to Local Public Goods

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Latin American Politics and Society Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI:10.1017/lap.2023.25
Katherine McKiernan
{"title":"Who Gets Credit? Citizen Responses to Local Public Goods","authors":"Katherine McKiernan","doi":"10.1017/lap.2023.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In decentralized systems, citizens struggle to identify which level of government provides local goods. This problem is particularly salient in weakly institutionalized party environments, where politicians at different levels of government are less likely to benefit from partisan coattail effects. This article asks how citizens attribute credit for local public goods. I argue that citizens have a strong tendency to attribute credit to local politicians. As a result, citizens will respond differently to credit-claiming behavior by local and national politicians. Local politicians experience a ceiling effect, in which credit claiming has no effect on how citizens attribute credit. However, national politicians have no such ceiling and can claim credit to increase the likelihood that citizens will attribute credit to them. As a result, both political actors can receive credit for the same local goods. The article tests and supports these theoretical predictions using a vignette survey experiment in Colombia.","PeriodicalId":46899,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Politics and Society","volume":"107 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Politics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2023.25","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In decentralized systems, citizens struggle to identify which level of government provides local goods. This problem is particularly salient in weakly institutionalized party environments, where politicians at different levels of government are less likely to benefit from partisan coattail effects. This article asks how citizens attribute credit for local public goods. I argue that citizens have a strong tendency to attribute credit to local politicians. As a result, citizens will respond differently to credit-claiming behavior by local and national politicians. Local politicians experience a ceiling effect, in which credit claiming has no effect on how citizens attribute credit. However, national politicians have no such ceiling and can claim credit to increase the likelihood that citizens will attribute credit to them. As a result, both political actors can receive credit for the same local goods. The article tests and supports these theoretical predictions using a vignette survey experiment in Colombia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁有功劳?市民对地方公共物品的反应
在分权体制中,公民很难确定哪一级政府提供本地产品。这个问题在制度化程度较弱的政党环境中尤为突出,在这种环境中,各级政府的政治家不太可能从党派连带效应中受益。这篇文章探讨了公民如何为地方公共产品赋予信用。我认为,市民有一种强烈的倾向,把功劳归功于当地的政治家。因此,公民对地方和国家政客的信用索取行为会有不同的反应。地方政客经历了一种天花板效应,即信用申请对公民如何评价信用没有影响。然而,国家政治家没有这样的上限,他们可以声称自己的功劳,以增加公民将功劳归于他们的可能性。因此,两个政治角色都可以从同样的当地商品中获得信用。文章测试和支持这些理论预测使用小插曲调查实验在哥伦比亚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Latin American Politics and Society publishes the highest-quality original social science scholarship on Latin America. The Editorial Board, comprising leading U.S., Latin American, and European scholars, is dedicated to challenging prevailing orthodoxies and promoting innovative theoretical and methodological perspectives on the states, societies, economies, and international relations of the Americas in a globalizing world.
期刊最新文献
Fairweather Cosmopolitans: Immigration Attitudes in Latin America During the Migrant Crisis When Resisting Is Not Enough: The killing of Latin American Feminist Activists (2015–23) A Unified Canon? Latin American Graduate Training in Comparative Politics Conceptualizing Mano Dura in Latin America Government formation in presidentialism: Disentangling the combined effects of pre-electoral coalitions and legislative polarization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1