An Ethics Action Plan for Rare Disease Care: Participatory Action Research Approach.

Q2 Medicine Journal of Participatory Medicine Pub Date : 2023-11-23 DOI:10.2196/46607
Ariane Quintal, Isabelle Carreau, Annie-Danielle Grenier, Caroline Hébert, Christine Yergeau, Yves Berthiaume, Eric Racine
{"title":"An Ethics Action Plan for Rare Disease Care: Participatory Action Research Approach.","authors":"Ariane Quintal, Isabelle Carreau, Annie-Danielle Grenier, Caroline Hébert, Christine Yergeau, Yves Berthiaume, Eric Racine","doi":"10.2196/46607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Owing to their low prevalence, rare diseases are poorly addressed in the scientific literature and clinical practice guidelines. Thus, health care workers are inadequately equipped to provide timely diagnoses, appropriate treatment, and support for these poorly understood conditions. These clinical tribulations are experienced as moral challenges by patients, jeopardizing their life trajectories, dreams, and aspirations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper presents an ethical action plan for rare disease care and the process underlying its development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This action plan was designed through an ethical inquiry conducted by the Ethics and Rare Diseases Working Group, which included 3 patient partners, 2 clinician researchers, and 1 representative from Québec's rare disease association.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The plan is structured into 4 components. Component A presents the key moral challenges encountered by patients, which are the lack of knowledge on rare diseases among health care workers, the problematic attitudes that it sometimes elicits, and the distress and powerlessness experienced by patients. Component B emphasizes a vision for patient partnership in rare disease care characterized by open-mindedness, empathy, respect, and support of patient autonomy from health care workers. Component C outlines 2 courses of action prompted by this vision: raising awareness among health care workers and empowering patients to better navigate their care. Component D compares several interventions that could help integrate these 2 courses of action in rare disease care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, this action plan represents a toolbox that provides a review of multiple possible interventions for policy makers, hospital managers, practitioners, researchers, and patient associations to critically reflect on key moral challenges experienced by patients with rare diseases and ways to mitigate them. This paper also prompts reflection on the values underlying rare disease care, patient experiences, and health care workers' beliefs and behaviors. Health care workers and patients were the primary beneficiaries of this action plan.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"15 ","pages":"e46607"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10704333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/46607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Owing to their low prevalence, rare diseases are poorly addressed in the scientific literature and clinical practice guidelines. Thus, health care workers are inadequately equipped to provide timely diagnoses, appropriate treatment, and support for these poorly understood conditions. These clinical tribulations are experienced as moral challenges by patients, jeopardizing their life trajectories, dreams, and aspirations.

Objective: This paper presents an ethical action plan for rare disease care and the process underlying its development.

Methods: This action plan was designed through an ethical inquiry conducted by the Ethics and Rare Diseases Working Group, which included 3 patient partners, 2 clinician researchers, and 1 representative from Québec's rare disease association.

Results: The plan is structured into 4 components. Component A presents the key moral challenges encountered by patients, which are the lack of knowledge on rare diseases among health care workers, the problematic attitudes that it sometimes elicits, and the distress and powerlessness experienced by patients. Component B emphasizes a vision for patient partnership in rare disease care characterized by open-mindedness, empathy, respect, and support of patient autonomy from health care workers. Component C outlines 2 courses of action prompted by this vision: raising awareness among health care workers and empowering patients to better navigate their care. Component D compares several interventions that could help integrate these 2 courses of action in rare disease care.

Conclusions: Overall, this action plan represents a toolbox that provides a review of multiple possible interventions for policy makers, hospital managers, practitioners, researchers, and patient associations to critically reflect on key moral challenges experienced by patients with rare diseases and ways to mitigate them. This paper also prompts reflection on the values underlying rare disease care, patient experiences, and health care workers' beliefs and behaviors. Health care workers and patients were the primary beneficiaries of this action plan.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罕见病护理伦理行动计划:参与式行动研究方法。
背景:由于发病率低,罕见病在科学文献和临床实践指南中很少得到重视。因此,卫生保健工作者没有足够的装备来提供及时的诊断、适当的治疗和对这些知之甚少的疾病的支持。这些临床的磨难是对病人的道德挑战,危及他们的生活轨迹、梦想和抱负。目的:介绍罕见病护理的伦理行动计划及其发展过程。方法:本行动计划是通过伦理与罕见病工作组进行的伦理调查来设计的,该工作组包括3名患者伴侣、2名临床研究人员和1名来自曲海省罕见病协会的代表。结果:该方案由4个部分组成。组成部分A提出了患者遇到的主要道德挑战,即卫生保健工作者缺乏对罕见疾病的知识,有时会引起有问题的态度,以及患者所经历的痛苦和无能为力。组成部分B强调罕见病护理中患者伙伴关系的愿景,其特点是思想开放、同情、尊重和卫生保健工作者对患者自主权的支持。C部分概述了这一愿景促使的两项行动方针:提高卫生保健工作者的认识,使患者能够更好地把握自己的护理。D部分比较了几种可能有助于将这两种行动方案整合到罕见病治疗中的干预措施。结论:总体而言,本行动计划代表了一个工具箱,为政策制定者、医院管理者、从业人员、研究人员和患者协会提供了多种可能的干预措施,以批判性地反思罕见病患者面临的主要道德挑战以及减轻这些挑战的方法。本文也促使人们反思罕见病护理、患者体验以及医护人员的信念和行为背后的价值观。保健工作者和病人是这项行动计划的主要受益者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Participatory Medicine
Journal of Participatory Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Value Propositions for Digital Shared Medication Plans to Boost Patient-Health Care Professional Partnerships: Co-Design Study. Assessing Physician and Patient Agreement on Whether Patient Outcomes Captured in Clinical Progress Notes Reflect Treatment Success: Cross-Sectional Study. Using Community Engagement to Create a Telecoaching Intervention to Improve Self-Management in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cystic Fibrosis: Qualitative Study. Developing a Digital Tool to Calculate Protein Quality in Plant-Based Meals of Older Adults: User Engagement Design Approach With End Users. From English to "Englishes": A Process Perspective on Enhancing the Linguistic Responsiveness of Culturally Tailored Cancer Prevention Interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1