Perception of Neurologists on Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Saudi Arabia.

Acta neurologica Taiwanica Pub Date : 2024-12-30
Hussein A Algahtani, Bader H Shirah, Yazeed K Albeladi, Reyadh K Albeladi
{"title":"Perception of Neurologists on Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Hussein A Algahtani, Bader H Shirah, Yazeed K Albeladi, Reyadh K Albeladi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has the advantage of minimizing intraoperative neurological injury and limiting serious postoperative complications. No previous studies have evaluated the importance of IONM, especially in Gulf and Arab countries. We aimed to investigate the importance of IONM, as evaluated from a neurologist perspective in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted in Saudi Arabia through face-to-face interviews. The inclusion criterion was adult neurology consultants in Saudi Arabia. The instrument used was a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 20 items to evaluate the perceptions on IONM. Data collection was from January 2022 to June 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 72 neurology consultants from Saudi Arabia participated in this study. The years of experience of the participants were 10-20 years (43.1%), most of whom worked in a tertiary healthcare center (72.2%), 31.9% had a certified neurologist trained in IONM, and approximately two-thirds of the institutions did not have an IONM setup (59.7%). Most neurologists believed that IONM should be part of neurology training programs (59.7%). Approximately, half of the respondents believed that IONM was mandatory (52.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IONM is considered the standard of care in many complex intracranial, spinal, and vascular surgeries. In our study, the perception of neurologists regarding IONM was promising, and the readiness of secondary and tertiary care centers to implement IONM was encouraging. Education, training, implementation, and regulations regarding IONM should be mandatory to prevent operative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":93852,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Taiwanica","volume":"33(4) ","pages":"161-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Taiwanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has the advantage of minimizing intraoperative neurological injury and limiting serious postoperative complications. No previous studies have evaluated the importance of IONM, especially in Gulf and Arab countries. We aimed to investigate the importance of IONM, as evaluated from a neurologist perspective in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Saudi Arabia through face-to-face interviews. The inclusion criterion was adult neurology consultants in Saudi Arabia. The instrument used was a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 20 items to evaluate the perceptions on IONM. Data collection was from January 2022 to June 2022.

Results: A total of 72 neurology consultants from Saudi Arabia participated in this study. The years of experience of the participants were 10-20 years (43.1%), most of whom worked in a tertiary healthcare center (72.2%), 31.9% had a certified neurologist trained in IONM, and approximately two-thirds of the institutions did not have an IONM setup (59.7%). Most neurologists believed that IONM should be part of neurology training programs (59.7%). Approximately, half of the respondents believed that IONM was mandatory (52.8%).

Conclusion: IONM is considered the standard of care in many complex intracranial, spinal, and vascular surgeries. In our study, the perception of neurologists regarding IONM was promising, and the readiness of secondary and tertiary care centers to implement IONM was encouraging. Education, training, implementation, and regulations regarding IONM should be mandatory to prevent operative complications.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特阿拉伯神经科医生对术中神经生理监测的看法。
目的:术中神经生理监测(IONM)具有减少术中神经损伤和减少术后严重并发症的优点。以前没有研究评估过移徙组织的重要性,特别是在海湾和阿拉伯国家。我们的目的是调查IONM的重要性,从沙特阿拉伯神经科医生的角度进行评估。方法:本横断面研究在沙特阿拉伯通过面对面访谈进行。纳入标准为沙特阿拉伯的成人神经内科顾问。所使用的工具是一份由20个项目组成的自我管理问卷,以评估对IONM的看法。数据收集时间为2022年1月至2022年6月。结果:来自沙特阿拉伯的72名神经内科顾问参与了本研究。参与者的经验年数为10-20年(43.1%),其中大多数人在三级医疗保健中心工作(72.2%),31.9%的人接受过IONM培训的认证神经科医生,大约三分之二的机构没有IONM设置(59.7%)。大多数神经科医生(59.7%)认为IONM应该成为神经学培训计划的一部分。大约一半的受访者认为IONM是强制性的(52.8%)。结论:IONM在许多复杂的颅内、脊柱和血管手术中被认为是标准的护理方法。在我们的研究中,神经科医生对IONM的看法是有希望的,二级和三级护理中心实施IONM的准备是令人鼓舞的。关于IONM的教育、培训、实施和法规应该是强制性的,以防止手术并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association between health literacy with stress, anxiety and depression in multiple sclerosis patients: A cross sectional analytical study. Perception of Neurologists on Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Saudi Arabia. The effect of 5A self-management program on medication adherence of epileptic patients during the COVID - 19 pandemic: A randomized controlled trial. Challenges in The Diagnosis of Ischemic stroke, Tuberculous Meningitis, and Co-Infection with HIV in a Socially Isolated Elderly Patient. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for seizures to recur in calcified neurocysticercosis : Prospective cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1