Can clinicians correctly predict intracranial pressure state based on clinical symptoms alone in shunted patients?

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurosurgical sciences Pub Date : 2023-11-23 DOI:10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06065-4
Sogha Khawari, Anand Pandit, Laurence Watkins, Ahmed Toma, Lewis Thorne
{"title":"Can clinicians correctly predict intracranial pressure state based on clinical symptoms alone in shunted patients?","authors":"Sogha Khawari, Anand Pandit, Laurence Watkins, Ahmed Toma, Lewis Thorne","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06065-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinicians are well-versed in the classical symptoms of low vs. high intracranial pressure (ICP). However, symptoms may not be as predictable of ICP state in shunted patients with chronic symptoms. In this study, we assess whether clinicians can predict high vs. low ICP state in chronically symptomatic shunted patients without any diagnostic clues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A detailed retrospective analysis was performed on 259 patients undergoing ICP monitoring. A total of 17 patients who had a ventriculoperitoneal shunt were identified, with a suspected chronic abnormal ICP state based only on clinical symptoms. Patients with investigations guiding towards a likely pressure state were excluded, e.g., imaging or ophthalmological findings suggestive of ICP state.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical suspicion of ICP state was incorrect in 16 out of 17 cases (P<0.05). The symptoms described by patients were suggestive of abnormal ICP states; however, 13 out of 17 cases demonstrated ICP within the normal range (-1.3 to 5.3 mmHg). Three patients with occipital headaches worse on standing, typical of low-pressure symptoms, were in fact shown to have ICP above 10.0 mmHg.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study casts doubt on the utility of classic symptoms in diagnosing abnormal ICP state in chronically symptomatic shunted patients with equivocal adjuncts. Additionally, it highlights the importance of ICP monitoring for this patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.23.06065-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinicians are well-versed in the classical symptoms of low vs. high intracranial pressure (ICP). However, symptoms may not be as predictable of ICP state in shunted patients with chronic symptoms. In this study, we assess whether clinicians can predict high vs. low ICP state in chronically symptomatic shunted patients without any diagnostic clues.

Methods: A detailed retrospective analysis was performed on 259 patients undergoing ICP monitoring. A total of 17 patients who had a ventriculoperitoneal shunt were identified, with a suspected chronic abnormal ICP state based only on clinical symptoms. Patients with investigations guiding towards a likely pressure state were excluded, e.g., imaging or ophthalmological findings suggestive of ICP state.

Results: Clinical suspicion of ICP state was incorrect in 16 out of 17 cases (P<0.05). The symptoms described by patients were suggestive of abnormal ICP states; however, 13 out of 17 cases demonstrated ICP within the normal range (-1.3 to 5.3 mmHg). Three patients with occipital headaches worse on standing, typical of low-pressure symptoms, were in fact shown to have ICP above 10.0 mmHg.

Conclusions: This study casts doubt on the utility of classic symptoms in diagnosing abnormal ICP state in chronically symptomatic shunted patients with equivocal adjuncts. Additionally, it highlights the importance of ICP monitoring for this patient group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床医生能否仅根据临床症状正确预测分流患者的颅内压状态?
背景:临床医生对低颅内压和高颅内压(ICP)的典型症状非常熟悉。然而,对于有慢性症状的分流患者,症状可能无法预测其ICP状态。在这项研究中,我们评估临床医生是否可以在没有任何诊断线索的情况下预测慢性症状分流患者的高或低ICP状态。方法:对259例颅内压监测患者进行回顾性分析。共有17例脑室-腹膜分流患者被确定,仅根据临床症状怀疑为慢性异常ICP状态。排除有可能存在压力状态的患者,例如影像学或眼科检查提示ICP状态。结果:17例患者中有16例临床对ICP状态的怀疑是不正确的(pp结论:本研究对慢性症状分流患者的典型症状在诊断ICP异常状态中的应用提出了质疑。此外,它强调了对这一患者群体进行ICP监测的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of intra-operative skull fixation techniques on cervical sagittal parameters. Normal pressure hydrocephalus treatment: is it time to rethink? Roxadustat protects oxidative stress and tissue injury in the brain induced by ischemic stroke via the HIF-1α/NRF2 axis. Follow-up neuroimaging after non-perimesencephalic, angiogram-negative subarachnoid hemorrhage. Tuberculum sellae meningiomas: surgical outcomes in 65 patients, review of the literature and proposal for an anatomical and radiological classification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1