Distal radial approach for arterial pressure monitoring with a long catheter provides safe and stable monitoring in the intensive care unit: A single-center retrospective study.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-23 DOI:10.1177/11297298231212393
Takaaki Maruhashi, Marina Oi, Jun Hattori, Yasushi Asari
{"title":"Distal radial approach for arterial pressure monitoring with a long catheter provides safe and stable monitoring in the intensive care unit: A single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Takaaki Maruhashi, Marina Oi, Jun Hattori, Yasushi Asari","doi":"10.1177/11297298231212393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare the distal radial artery approach (DRA) with a longer catheter to DRA with a shorter catheter in arterial catheter (AC) placement in the intensive care unit (ICU).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of DRA with a long catheter (60 mm) for arterial catheterization in the ICU. DRA with a short catheter (25-30 mm) was used in the control group, and the groups were compared using multivariate regression analysis. The primary study endpoint was the incidence of unplanned AC removal. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of other inappropriate events, namely loss of arterial pressure waveforms, bleeding, catheter-related infection, pressure ulcer, and other complications associated with the AC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, the DRA with a long catheter was used in 50 patients. No unplanned AC removals or other inappropriate events occurred, and there were no complications associated with the DRA. The DRA procedural success rate was 100%. There was no significant difference in hemostasis times between the groups. Loss of arterial waveforms was an early predictor of unplanned AC removal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DRA with a long catheter provided stable monitoring and was associated with a low unplanned removal rate. This method has the advantages of fewer complications and shorter hemostasis time compared with the DRA with a short catheter, and may become a new AC option in the ICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"168-174"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231212393","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To compare the distal radial artery approach (DRA) with a longer catheter to DRA with a shorter catheter in arterial catheter (AC) placement in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of DRA with a long catheter (60 mm) for arterial catheterization in the ICU. DRA with a short catheter (25-30 mm) was used in the control group, and the groups were compared using multivariate regression analysis. The primary study endpoint was the incidence of unplanned AC removal. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of other inappropriate events, namely loss of arterial pressure waveforms, bleeding, catheter-related infection, pressure ulcer, and other complications associated with the AC.

Results: In this study, the DRA with a long catheter was used in 50 patients. No unplanned AC removals or other inappropriate events occurred, and there were no complications associated with the DRA. The DRA procedural success rate was 100%. There was no significant difference in hemostasis times between the groups. Loss of arterial waveforms was an early predictor of unplanned AC removal.

Conclusions: The DRA with a long catheter provided stable monitoring and was associated with a low unplanned removal rate. This method has the advantages of fewer complications and shorter hemostasis time compared with the DRA with a short catheter, and may become a new AC option in the ICU.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
桡动脉远端入路长导管动脉压监测在重症监护病房提供安全稳定的监测:一项单中心回顾性研究
背景:比较重症监护病房(ICU)桡动脉远端入路(DRA)与桡动脉远端入路(DRA)在动脉导管(AC)置入中的应用。方法:这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,采用长导管(60mm)在ICU进行动脉插管。对照组采用短导管(25-30 mm)进行DRA治疗,两组比较采用多因素回归分析。主要研究终点是非计划切除AC的发生率。次要终点是其他不适当事件的发生率,即动脉压力波形丧失、出血、导管相关感染、压疮和其他与ac相关的并发症。结果:在本研究中,50例患者使用了长导管的DRA。没有发生计划外的AC移除或其他不适当的事件,也没有与DRA相关的并发症。DRA手术成功率为100%。两组间止血时间差异无统计学意义。动脉波形的丧失是非计划AC切除的早期预测因子。结论:长导管的DRA提供了稳定的监测,并与低的计划外拔除率相关。与短导管DRA相比,该方法具有并发症少、止血时间短的优点,可能成为ICU的一种新的AC选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
期刊最新文献
First successful use of translocated autologous great saphenous vein to the upper arm for hemodialysis access in Vietnam: A 3-year follow-up case report. Femoral venous access: State of the art and future perspectives. Elimination of bleeding after tunnelled catheter removal by modified technique in practice. Integrated short peripheral intravenous cannulas and risk of catheter failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Comparison of procedural time with two different ultrasound-guided approaches for dorsalis pedis artery cannulation in adult patients: A randomized trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1