[Indicators to measure the performance of emergency trauma care].

Juan Daniel Vera-López, Ileana Beatriz Heredia-Pi, Ricardo Pérez-Núñez, Martha Hijar
{"title":"[Indicators to measure the performance of emergency trauma care].","authors":"Juan Daniel Vera-López, Ileana Beatriz Heredia-Pi, Ricardo Pérez-Núñez, Martha Hijar","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10064412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this paper was to identify the main indicators used to measure the performance in emergency trauma care. A literature review was carried out in the electronic databases: PubMEd, LILACS and Epistemónikos, including publications between January 2011 and December 31, 2021, in Spanish, English and Portuguese. A total of 962 publications were identified. When reviewing the full text, 48 articles were included. The indicators were classified in the dimensions of process and results. 100 different indicators were identified to analyze the performance of emergency trauma care. 71% were process indicators, including service time and triage. In the results dimension 29 indicators were identified; mortality was the indicator most analyzed as well as length of stay. Six indicators on the disability of injured people and 14 indicators related to satisfaction were identified, the most frequent being complaints. Various indicators have been used to assess the performance of emergency trauma care. In the results dimension, the indicators related to satisfaction and disability after injuries have been little explored. Decision-makers and those responsible for emergency care must promote performance evaluation exercises to learn about their current situation using appropriate and sensitive indicators with the available data.</p>","PeriodicalId":94200,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10721338/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10064412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this paper was to identify the main indicators used to measure the performance in emergency trauma care. A literature review was carried out in the electronic databases: PubMEd, LILACS and Epistemónikos, including publications between January 2011 and December 31, 2021, in Spanish, English and Portuguese. A total of 962 publications were identified. When reviewing the full text, 48 articles were included. The indicators were classified in the dimensions of process and results. 100 different indicators were identified to analyze the performance of emergency trauma care. 71% were process indicators, including service time and triage. In the results dimension 29 indicators were identified; mortality was the indicator most analyzed as well as length of stay. Six indicators on the disability of injured people and 14 indicators related to satisfaction were identified, the most frequent being complaints. Various indicators have been used to assess the performance of emergency trauma care. In the results dimension, the indicators related to satisfaction and disability after injuries have been little explored. Decision-makers and those responsible for emergency care must promote performance evaluation exercises to learn about their current situation using appropriate and sensitive indicators with the available data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[衡量急诊创伤护理绩效的指标]。
本文的目的是确定用于衡量急诊创伤护理绩效的主要指标。在PubMEd、LILACS和Epistemónikos等电子数据库中进行文献综述,包括2011年1月至2021年12月31日期间西班牙语、英语和葡萄牙语的出版物。共确定了962份出版物。在审阅全文时,共收录了48篇文章。指标分为过程和结果两个维度。确定了100个不同的指标来分析紧急创伤护理的绩效。71%是流程指标,包括服务时间和分诊。结果维度共确定了29个指标;死亡率和住院时间是分析最多的指标。确定了6项关于受伤人员残疾的指标和14项与满意度有关的指标,其中最常见的是投诉。各种指标已被用来评估急诊创伤护理的表现。在结果维度中,对伤害后满意度和残疾相关指标的研究很少。决策者和负责急救的人必须促进绩效评估工作,利用适当和敏感的指标和现有数据了解他们的现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Breast cancer: suspicious findings on mastography associated with the histopathological result]. [Changes in hypertensive control 2020-2021 in a family medicine unit]. [Coronary artery disease multivessel not amenable to revascularization: contemporary cohort]. [Detection of ionizing radiation in operating room and hospital areas]. [Diaphragmatic excursion time index as a predictor of extubation in intensive therapy].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1