Muhammad Azharuddin MPT, Sarah Parveen MPT, Majumi M. Noohu PhD
{"title":"Effects of Neural Mobilization in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Scoping Review","authors":"Muhammad Azharuddin MPT, Sarah Parveen MPT, Majumi M. Noohu PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2023.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the effects of neural mobilization (NM) on outcomes in adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Five databases were searched—PubMed, Web of Science (Web of Science Core Collection), Physiotherapy Evidence Database<span> (PEDro), and Scopus—from inception to January 2022. The studies included were randomized controlled trials, pre-post single group design, multiple case studies, controlled case studies, quasi-experimental studies, and single case studies, which are published in full text in English.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Six studies were included in this review, and most were of low-level evidence. The sample size of the studies ranges from 20 to 43, except for 1 case study, with a total of 158 participants in all the studies combined. In 4 out of 6 studies, only NM was given, whereas in 2 studies, NM was used along with other treatment strategies. The </span>tibial nerve<span><span><span> was the most studied nerve, whereas 1 study administered NM to nerves of the upper limbs, and only 1 trial examined the sciatic nerve. The outcomes included the Michigan </span>Neuropathy Screening Instrument questionnaire, </span>nerve conduction velocity<span><span>, vibration perception threshold, heat/cold perception threshold, weight-bearing asymmetry and range of motion of lower limb, </span>quality of life, and magnetic imaging changes.</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>At present, only a few low-level studies exist on the use of NM for the treatment of adults with DPN. The evidence for use of NM on DPN is still limited and insufficient.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370723000603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the effects of neural mobilization (NM) on outcomes in adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).
Methods
Five databases were searched—PubMed, Web of Science (Web of Science Core Collection), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and Scopus—from inception to January 2022. The studies included were randomized controlled trials, pre-post single group design, multiple case studies, controlled case studies, quasi-experimental studies, and single case studies, which are published in full text in English.
Results
Six studies were included in this review, and most were of low-level evidence. The sample size of the studies ranges from 20 to 43, except for 1 case study, with a total of 158 participants in all the studies combined. In 4 out of 6 studies, only NM was given, whereas in 2 studies, NM was used along with other treatment strategies. The tibial nerve was the most studied nerve, whereas 1 study administered NM to nerves of the upper limbs, and only 1 trial examined the sciatic nerve. The outcomes included the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument questionnaire, nerve conduction velocity, vibration perception threshold, heat/cold perception threshold, weight-bearing asymmetry and range of motion of lower limb, quality of life, and magnetic imaging changes.
Conclusion
At present, only a few low-level studies exist on the use of NM for the treatment of adults with DPN. The evidence for use of NM on DPN is still limited and insufficient.
目的探讨神经活动(NM)对成人糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)预后的影响。方法对pubmed、Web of Science (Web of Science核心馆藏)、物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)和scopus 5个数据库进行检索,检索时间为建库至2022年1月。纳入的研究包括随机对照试验、前后单组设计、多病例研究、对照研究、准实验研究和单病例研究,均以英文全文发表。结果本综述纳入6项研究,大多数为低水平证据。这些研究的样本量为20 ~ 43个,除1个案例研究外,所有研究的受试者总数为158人。在6项研究中,有4项研究仅给予NM,而在2项研究中,NM与其他治疗策略一起使用。胫骨神经是研究最多的神经,而1项研究将NM用于上肢神经,只有1项试验检查了坐骨神经。结果包括密歇根神经病变筛查仪问卷、神经传导速度、振动感知阈值、冷热感知阈值、负重不对称性和下肢活动范围、生活质量、磁共振成像变化。结论目前,关于NM治疗成人DPN的低水平研究较少。使用NM治疗DPN的证据仍然有限和不足。