Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio does not behave as a good predictor of pathological complete response in breast cancer: A retrospective analysis in the neoadjuvant setting

Giovana Diniz de Oliveira Bonetti , Vitória de Oliveira Ximendes , Cristhian Ferreira Falleiro , Lidielle Oliveira de Morais , Luiza Trisch da Silva , Mariana Severo Debastiani , Rafael José Vargas Alves , Claudia Giuliano Bica
{"title":"Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio does not behave as a good predictor of pathological complete response in breast cancer: A retrospective analysis in the neoadjuvant setting","authors":"Giovana Diniz de Oliveira Bonetti ,&nbsp;Vitória de Oliveira Ximendes ,&nbsp;Cristhian Ferreira Falleiro ,&nbsp;Lidielle Oliveira de Morais ,&nbsp;Luiza Trisch da Silva ,&nbsp;Mariana Severo Debastiani ,&nbsp;Rafael José Vargas Alves ,&nbsp;Claudia Giuliano Bica","doi":"10.1016/j.adcanc.2023.100113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The breast cancer scenario now requires new solutions for diagnosis and follow-up. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been studied as a possible biomarker for predicting prognosis in solid tumors. Due to the ease of obtaining these values from a blood count, NLR could be useful in clinical practice. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the relation between NLR and pathologic complete response (PCR) in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment. We performed a cross-sectional retrospective study, including ductal breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery between 2017 and 2019 at the reference hospital institution (n = 1230). Our data were obtained from medical records and laboratory results, so the study was approved by the research ethics committee of the data-providing hospital. Inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in a final sample of 114 patients. The area under the curve (ROC) showed no statistically significant area (AUC = 0.546) with a CI95% = 0.417–0.676. No relation between NLR and PCR was observed (p = 0.631), indicating that NLR is not a good biomarker for PCR in this population. Regarding the pattern of NLR for different molecular subtypes, no statistical relation was found (p = 0.929). Thus, our study supports the literature that suggests there is no relationship between NLR and PCR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72083,"journal":{"name":"Advances in cancer biology - metastasis","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100113"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667394023000278/pdfft?md5=385726012299720c3f1c203ca92f9a74&pid=1-s2.0-S2667394023000278-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in cancer biology - metastasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667394023000278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The breast cancer scenario now requires new solutions for diagnosis and follow-up. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been studied as a possible biomarker for predicting prognosis in solid tumors. Due to the ease of obtaining these values from a blood count, NLR could be useful in clinical practice. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the relation between NLR and pathologic complete response (PCR) in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment. We performed a cross-sectional retrospective study, including ductal breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery between 2017 and 2019 at the reference hospital institution (n = 1230). Our data were obtained from medical records and laboratory results, so the study was approved by the research ethics committee of the data-providing hospital. Inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in a final sample of 114 patients. The area under the curve (ROC) showed no statistically significant area (AUC = 0.546) with a CI95% = 0.417–0.676. No relation between NLR and PCR was observed (p = 0.631), indicating that NLR is not a good biomarker for PCR in this population. Regarding the pattern of NLR for different molecular subtypes, no statistical relation was found (p = 0.929). Thus, our study supports the literature that suggests there is no relationship between NLR and PCR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比值不能作为乳腺癌病理完全缓解的良好预测指标:一项新辅助治疗的回顾性分析
乳腺癌的情况现在需要新的诊断和随访解决方案。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)已被研究作为预测实体瘤预后的可能生物标志物。由于易于从血细胞计数中获得这些值,NLR在临床实践中可能是有用的。因此,本研究的目的是分析乳腺癌新辅助治疗患者NLR与病理完全反应(PCR)的关系。我们进行了一项横断面回顾性研究,包括2017年至2019年在参考医院机构接受新辅助化疗和手术的导管性乳腺癌患者(n = 1230)。我们的数据来源于病历和实验室结果,因此本研究得到了数据提供医院的研究伦理委员会的批准。纳入和排除标准导致114例患者的最终样本。曲线下面积(ROC)无统计学意义(AUC = 0.546), CI95% = 0.417-0.676。NLR与PCR无相关性(p = 0.631),表明NLR在该人群中不是很好的PCR生物标志物。不同分子亚型NLR的分布差异无统计学意义(p = 0.929)。因此,我们的研究支持了有关NLR和PCR之间没有关系的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in cancer biology - metastasis
Advances in cancer biology - metastasis Cancer Research, Oncology
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
The effect of pDNA-Buforin II on the expression changes of lncRNAs PCA3, PCAT1, PRNCR1, GAS5 in prostate cancer ZNF775 inhibits MCF-7 breast cancer cell migration by downregulating Wnt5a Niosomes containing enciprazine hydrochloride have been shown to efficiently inhibit the proliferation and induce apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells Navigating the interplay between BCL-2 family proteins, apoptosis, and autophagy in colorectal cancer PD-L1 and PD-1 in immune regulation and their implications in blood cancers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1