Интуиция магического в теории: “Медленное чтение” М.О. Гершензона

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, SLAVIC RUSSIAN LITERATURE Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ruslit.2022.06.003
Наталья Н. Смирнова (Natalia N. Smirnova)
{"title":"Интуиция магического в теории: “Медленное чтение” М.О. Гершензона","authors":"Наталья Н. Смирнова (Natalia N. Smirnova)","doi":"10.1016/j.ruslit.2022.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>M.O. Gershenzon theorized that poetry is a magic action which appeals directly to “the primal myth”. The primal myth in the poetic word is opposed to metaphorical meaning in its rhetorical sense (as A.A. Potebnja described it). A poet sees an invisible world and really believes in the existence of ghosts (Gershenzon stated this in <em>The Poet’s Vision</em>, <em>Pushkin’s Wisdom</em>, <em>Gulfstream</em>, etc.). The magic poetic word of antiquity is no longer accessible to the understanding of the modern reader. Therefore, Gershenzon thought, a scholar / exegete must have congenial intuition in order to reveal the word from under layers of obliterated metaphors. It is ironic that for many decades this view was realized as a metaphorical style of thinking, almost destroying itself. But the theoretical ideas connected with this view went unnoticed (unlike the theory of Russian formalists, who also relied on Potebnja’s ideas about the genesis of metaphor). Gershenzon’s theoretical intuition is based on transference of the properties of the studied subject (the primal myth in a poet’s word) into research itself (attempts to reveal the poetic word’s “spell” through <em>slow reading</em>), making the magic a constructive element of the theory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43192,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347922000588","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

M.O. Gershenzon theorized that poetry is a magic action which appeals directly to “the primal myth”. The primal myth in the poetic word is opposed to metaphorical meaning in its rhetorical sense (as A.A. Potebnja described it). A poet sees an invisible world and really believes in the existence of ghosts (Gershenzon stated this in The Poet’s Vision, Pushkin’s Wisdom, Gulfstream, etc.). The magic poetic word of antiquity is no longer accessible to the understanding of the modern reader. Therefore, Gershenzon thought, a scholar / exegete must have congenial intuition in order to reveal the word from under layers of obliterated metaphors. It is ironic that for many decades this view was realized as a metaphorical style of thinking, almost destroying itself. But the theoretical ideas connected with this view went unnoticed (unlike the theory of Russian formalists, who also relied on Potebnja’s ideas about the genesis of metaphor). Gershenzon’s theoretical intuition is based on transference of the properties of the studied subject (the primal myth in a poet’s word) into research itself (attempts to reveal the poetic word’s “spell” through slow reading), making the magic a constructive element of the theory.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理论中的神奇直觉:“读得慢”
M.O. Gershenzon认为诗歌是一种直接诉诸“原始神话”的神奇行为。诗歌中的原始神话与修辞意义上的隐喻意义是对立的(正如A.A. Potebnja所描述的那样)。诗人看到了一个看不见的世界,并且真的相信鬼魂的存在(格申宗在《诗人的视野》、《普希金的智慧》、《湾流》等书中都提到了这一点)。古代神奇的诗文已不再为现代读者所理解。因此,Gershenzon认为,一个学者/注释者必须有一致的直觉,才能从被抹去的隐喻层下揭示这个词。具有讽刺意味的是,几十年来,这种观点被视为一种隐喻式的思维方式,几乎毁灭了自己。但是,与这一观点相关的理论思想却被忽视了(不像俄国形式主义者的理论,他们也依赖于波特尼亚关于隐喻起源的观点)。Gershenzon的理论直觉是基于将研究对象的属性(诗人话语中的原始神话)转移到研究本身(试图通过缓慢的阅读揭示诗歌单词的“咒语”),使魔法成为理论的建设性元素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
RUSSIAN LITERATURE
RUSSIAN LITERATURE LITERATURE, SLAVIC-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Russian Literature combines issues devoted to special topics of Russian literature with contributions on related subjects in Croatian, Serbian, Czech, Slovak and Polish literatures. Moreover, several issues each year contain articles on heterogeneous subjects concerning Russian Literature. All methods and viewpoints are welcomed, provided they contribute something new, original or challenging to our understanding of Russian and other Slavic literatures. Russian Literature regularly publishes special issues devoted to: • the historical avant-garde in Russian literature and in the other Slavic literatures • the development of descriptive and theoretical poetics in Russian studies and in studies of other Slavic fields.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board В поисках симметрии. Андрей Битов и его последний роман Rebellion Against the Church in the Name of Christ – Nikolai Leskov’s Rebel Priests and Russian Cultural Tradition «Навь и явь» в «Дневнике мыслей» Алексея Ремизова. Январь – февраль 1953 г. Review Article: New Russian Literary History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1