Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecological emergencies

Rafael Ferro , Yannick Hurni , Stéphanie Seidler , Daniela Huber
{"title":"Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecological emergencies","authors":"Rafael Ferro ,&nbsp;Yannick Hurni ,&nbsp;Stéphanie Seidler ,&nbsp;Daniela Huber","doi":"10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is an emerging minimally invasive approach increasingly applied to perform many gynecological procedures. Despite a still limited level of evidence, compared to conventional laparoscopy, vNOTES seems to be associated with reduced blood loss, shorter operative time, less postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization time, better cosmetic results and decreased postoperative morbidity. Although growing evidence supports the effectiveness of vNOTES for elective adnexal surgeries, there is still limited knowledge regarding its feasibility and safety in emergency settings. In the present study, we report our experience performing vNOTES in gynecological emergency cases.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We prospectively collected and analyzed data from patients who underwent vNOTES for gynecological emergencies between November 2021 and June 2023. Demographic and perioperative characteristics were collected and analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventeen patients were included. Interventions were realized for suspicion of ectopic pregnancy in 7 cases (41.2%), for suspicion of adnexal torsion in 7 cases (41.2%), for post-hysterectomy hemoperitoneum in 2 cases (11.8%), and for uncontrollable uterine bleeding in 1 case (5.9%). Emergency procedures included unilateral salpingectomy (35.3%), ovarian cystectomy (23.5%), ovarian cystotomy (17.6%), adnexal detorsion (11.8%), hemoperitoneum drainage (11.8%), hysterectomy (5.9%), and appendectomy (5.9%). The overall median operative time was 38 [18–72] minutes. The median estimated intraoperative blood loss was 30 [5−150] mL, and no intraoperative complications occurred. Conversion to conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy was never needed. Patients stayed hospitalized for a median time of 30 [4−144] hours after the intervention. The median visual analog scale value for postoperative pain evaluation was 2 [0−5] at 12, 24, and 48 postoperative hours. No complications associated with the procedure occurred.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study demonstrated the feasibility of performing vNOTES procedures for managing gynecological emergencies such as tubal ectopic pregnancy, adnexal torsion, painful ovarian lesions, post-hysterectomy hemoperitoneum, and uncontrollable uterine bleeding. Associated with data reported in the available literature, our results suggest potential benefits in treating gynecological emergencies by vNOTES over conventional laparoscopy. However, stronger evidence from larger studies is needed to confirm it.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37085,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161323000868/pdfft?md5=eeac0ea831b35ff28f79a35bc4d660f5&pid=1-s2.0-S2590161323000868-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161323000868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is an emerging minimally invasive approach increasingly applied to perform many gynecological procedures. Despite a still limited level of evidence, compared to conventional laparoscopy, vNOTES seems to be associated with reduced blood loss, shorter operative time, less postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization time, better cosmetic results and decreased postoperative morbidity. Although growing evidence supports the effectiveness of vNOTES for elective adnexal surgeries, there is still limited knowledge regarding its feasibility and safety in emergency settings. In the present study, we report our experience performing vNOTES in gynecological emergency cases.

Study design

We prospectively collected and analyzed data from patients who underwent vNOTES for gynecological emergencies between November 2021 and June 2023. Demographic and perioperative characteristics were collected and analyzed.

Results

Seventeen patients were included. Interventions were realized for suspicion of ectopic pregnancy in 7 cases (41.2%), for suspicion of adnexal torsion in 7 cases (41.2%), for post-hysterectomy hemoperitoneum in 2 cases (11.8%), and for uncontrollable uterine bleeding in 1 case (5.9%). Emergency procedures included unilateral salpingectomy (35.3%), ovarian cystectomy (23.5%), ovarian cystotomy (17.6%), adnexal detorsion (11.8%), hemoperitoneum drainage (11.8%), hysterectomy (5.9%), and appendectomy (5.9%). The overall median operative time was 38 [18–72] minutes. The median estimated intraoperative blood loss was 30 [5−150] mL, and no intraoperative complications occurred. Conversion to conventional laparoscopy or laparotomy was never needed. Patients stayed hospitalized for a median time of 30 [4−144] hours after the intervention. The median visual analog scale value for postoperative pain evaluation was 2 [0−5] at 12, 24, and 48 postoperative hours. No complications associated with the procedure occurred.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the feasibility of performing vNOTES procedures for managing gynecological emergencies such as tubal ectopic pregnancy, adnexal torsion, painful ovarian lesions, post-hysterectomy hemoperitoneum, and uncontrollable uterine bleeding. Associated with data reported in the available literature, our results suggest potential benefits in treating gynecological emergencies by vNOTES over conventional laparoscopy. However, stronger evidence from larger studies is needed to confirm it.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经阴道自然孔腔内窥镜手术(vNOTES)在妇科急诊
目的经阴道自然孔腔内窥镜手术(vNOTES)是一种新兴的微创手术方式,越来越多地应用于许多妇科手术。尽管证据水平仍然有限,但与传统腹腔镜相比,vNOTES似乎与出血量减少、手术时间缩短、术后疼痛减轻、住院时间缩短、美容效果更好以及术后发病率降低有关。尽管越来越多的证据支持vNOTES在选择性附件手术中的有效性,但关于其在紧急情况下的可行性和安全性的知识仍然有限。在本研究中,我们报告了我们在妇科急诊病例中实施vNOTES的经验。研究设计我们前瞻性地收集和分析了2021年11月至2023年6月期间因妇科急诊接受vNOTES的患者的数据。收集和分析人口统计学和围手术期特征。结果纳入17例患者。怀疑异位妊娠7例(41.2%),怀疑附件扭转7例(41.2%),子宫切除术后腹腔出血2例(11.8%),无法控制的子宫出血1例(5.9%)。急诊手术包括单侧输卵管切除术(35.3%)、卵巢膀胱切除术(23.5%)、卵巢膀胱切除术(17.6%)、附件扭转术(11.8%)、腹腔出血引流术(11.8%)、子宫切除术(5.9%)和阑尾切除术(5.9%)。总中位手术时间为38[18-72]分钟。术中估计出血量中位数为30[5−150]mL,无术中并发症发生。从未需要转换到传统的腹腔镜或剖腹手术。干预后患者住院的中位时间为30[4−144]小时。术后12、24和48小时的疼痛评估中位视觉模拟评分值为2[0−5]。无并发症发生。结论:vNOTES手术治疗输卵管异位妊娠、附件扭转、卵巢疼痛性病变、子宫切除术后腹膜出血和子宫不可控出血等妇科急症是可行的。结合现有文献报道的数据,我们的研究结果表明vNOTES在治疗妇科急诊方面比传统腹腔镜有潜在的优势。然而,需要来自更大规模研究的更有力的证据来证实这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
58 days
期刊最新文献
Foeto–Maternal outcomes of pregnancies beyond 41 weeks of gestation after induced or spontaneous labour Editorial Board Epidemiology and placental pathology of intrauterine fetal demise in a tertiary hospital in the Philippines Perinatal outcomes in indian women with Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome (APS): Five year experience from a tertiary care centre Postmortem fertilization: New Italian government guidelines affirm the legitimacy of this procedure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1