Evaluation of multiple digital elevation models for hypsometric analysis in the watersheds affected by the opening of the Red Sea

Abstract

Climate change is increasingly affecting the Red Sea-related terrains in Egypt and Saudi Arabia with a notable increase in heavy precipitation events. This highly vulnerable region to flashfloods and other climate change-driven hazards encompasses rough terrains with more than 11,000 basins/subbasins, which necessitates the accurate estimation of their hydrological and geomorphological parameters among which the hypsometric analysis. In this regard, The study examines the accuracy of the hypsometric analysis extracted using open source SRTM-1, ASTER-GDEM, Copernicus-GLO30, ALOS-DEM against high-resolution Topo-1 m and Topo-2.8 m DEMs for Talat Hamdh basin in Egypt and Wadi El-Salwely basin in Saudi Arabia, respectively. Copernicus-GLO30 shows the highest accuracy among all DEMs with the root-mean-squared–error (RMSE), mean elevation error, standard deviation, maximum and minimum absolute errors of 3.03, 2.0, 2.3, 11.7 and 0.1 m, respectively for Talat Hamdh basin. The findings also show that, regardless of the geology and geomorphic evolution of the basin, the hypsometric analysis is sensitive to the DEM type rather than the spatial resolution as Copernicus DEM yields similar basin numbers (a single basin) and area (1.366 and 141.9 km²) compared to the reference DEMs (1.408 and 154.4 km²) for Talat Hamdh and Wadi El-Salwely basins, respectively. Contrariwise, other open source DEMs yield multiple basins and thus significantly smaller basin area. Given the DEM-type dependence of the hypsometric analysis, the study recommends that large-scale hydrological and geomorphological analyses should consider using a high-resolution reference DEM on a local-scale basin to examine the accuracy of open source DEMs prior to conducting the analysis.