Development and Validation of a Breastfeeding Health Literacy Scale (BFHLS) for Taiwanese Pregnant Women.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Human Lactation Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-25 DOI:10.1177/08903344231211494
Hsueh-Fen Chou, Ya-Fen Wang, Tzu-Ling Chen, Meei-Ling Gau
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Breastfeeding Health Literacy Scale (BFHLS) for Taiwanese Pregnant Women.","authors":"Hsueh-Fen Chou, Ya-Fen Wang, Tzu-Ling Chen, Meei-Ling Gau","doi":"10.1177/08903344231211494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breastfeeding is the best source of nutrition for infants. Health literacy is a critical factor affecting breastfeeding rates.</p><p><strong>Research aims: </strong>The aim of this research was to develop and test the Breastfeeding Health Literacy Scale to determine its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study featured a cross-sectional telephone survey design. Researchers reviewed the literature and used expert opinions to develop the content-validated 30-item Breastfeeding Health Literacy Scale covering five dimensions. We examined internal consistency, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis to assess reliability and construct validity. A Taiwanese government organization provided potential participants' contact information. After mailing an invitation letter, researchers phoned all participants to invite participation, obtain oral consent and complete a Breastfeeding Health Literacy Scale and collect demographic data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>N</i> = 300) had a mean age of 31.8 (<i>SD</i> = 4.66) years. The item-level content validity index was 0.67 to 1.00 and scale-content validity index was 0.94. After performing exploratory factor analysis, three factors were extracted. Examining content factor analysis for the three factors resulted in χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 2.05; <i>p</i> < .001; goodness of fit index = 0.90; Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.96; and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.06. Cronbach's alphas on the total scale and the subscales ranged from 0.87 to 0.94. Women with multigravida, breastfeeding information from physicians and nurses, and previous breastfeeding experience had better breastfeeding health literacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Psychometric analysis demonstrated that the newly developed 20-item Breastfeeding Health Literacy Scale is a valid self-assessment instrument. Improving breastfeeding health literacy during pregnancy could help enable breastfeeding success.</p>","PeriodicalId":15948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Lactation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Lactation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08903344231211494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breastfeeding is the best source of nutrition for infants. Health literacy is a critical factor affecting breastfeeding rates.

Research aims: The aim of this research was to develop and test the Breastfeeding Health Literacy Scale to determine its validity and reliability.

Methods: This study featured a cross-sectional telephone survey design. Researchers reviewed the literature and used expert opinions to develop the content-validated 30-item Breastfeeding Health Literacy Scale covering five dimensions. We examined internal consistency, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis to assess reliability and construct validity. A Taiwanese government organization provided potential participants' contact information. After mailing an invitation letter, researchers phoned all participants to invite participation, obtain oral consent and complete a Breastfeeding Health Literacy Scale and collect demographic data.

Results: Participants (N = 300) had a mean age of 31.8 (SD = 4.66) years. The item-level content validity index was 0.67 to 1.00 and scale-content validity index was 0.94. After performing exploratory factor analysis, three factors were extracted. Examining content factor analysis for the three factors resulted in χ2/df = 2.05; p < .001; goodness of fit index = 0.90; Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.96; and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.06. Cronbach's alphas on the total scale and the subscales ranged from 0.87 to 0.94. Women with multigravida, breastfeeding information from physicians and nurses, and previous breastfeeding experience had better breastfeeding health literacy.

Conclusions: Psychometric analysis demonstrated that the newly developed 20-item Breastfeeding Health Literacy Scale is a valid self-assessment instrument. Improving breastfeeding health literacy during pregnancy could help enable breastfeeding success.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
台湾孕妇母乳喂养健康素养量表(BFHLS)之编制与验证。
背景:母乳喂养是婴儿最好的营养来源。卫生知识普及是影响母乳喂养率的一个关键因素。研究目的:本研究的目的是开发和测试母乳喂养健康素养量表,以确定其效度和信度。方法:本研究采用横断面电话调查设计。研究人员回顾了文献,并利用专家意见制定了内容经过验证的30项母乳喂养健康素养量表,涵盖了五个方面。我们检验了内部一致性、探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析来评估信度和结构效度。一个台湾政府机构提供了潜在参与者的联系方式。在发送邀请函后,研究人员给所有参与者打电话邀请他们参与,获得口头同意,完成母乳喂养健康素养量表并收集人口统计数据。结果:300名参与者的平均年龄为31.8岁(SD = 4.66)。项目水平的内容效度指数为0.67 ~ 1.00,量表-内容效度指数为0.94。经探索性因子分析,提取出三个因子。对3个因素进行含量因子分析,χ2/df = 2.05;p结论:心理测量分析表明,新编制的20项母乳喂养健康素养量表是一种有效的自我评估工具。提高孕期母乳喂养健康知识有助于母乳喂养的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Lactation
Journal of Human Lactation 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Committed to the promotion of diversity and equity in all our policies and practices, our aims are: To provide our readers and the international communities of clinicians, educators and scholars working in the field of lactation with current and quality-based evidence, from a broad array of disciplines, including the medical sciences, basic sciences, social sciences and the humanities. To provide student and novice researchers, as well as, researchers whose native language is not English, with expert editorial guidance while preparing their work for publication in JHL. In each issue, the Journal of Human Lactation publishes original research, original theoretical and conceptual articles, discussions of policy and practice issues, and the following special features: Advocacy: A column that discusses a ‘hot’ topic in lactation advocacy About Research: A column focused on an in-depth discussion of a different research topic each issue Lactation Newsmakers: An interview with a widely-recognized outstanding expert in the field from around the globe Research Commentary: A brief discussion of the issues raised in a specific research article published in the current issue Book review(s): Reviews written by content experts about relevant new publications International News Briefs: From major international lactation organizations.
期刊最新文献
Documenting Our History. Response to Letter to the Editor. Trajectories of Breastfeeding-Related Thoughts and Attitudes Among Low-Income Smoke-Exposed Pregnant Women: A Latent Class Growth Analysis. Barriers and Facilitators in Lactation Support for the Preterm Mother-Infant Dyad: An Integrated Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1