Cardiovascular adverse events in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-08 DOI:10.1002/phar.2896
Fangzheng Yuan, Carrie Lenneman, Ronald Krone, Grant R Williams, Darryl Outlaw, Michael Katsnelson, Stephen Lirette
{"title":"Cardiovascular adverse events in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors.","authors":"Fangzheng Yuan, Carrie Lenneman, Ronald Krone, Grant R Williams, Darryl Outlaw, Michael Katsnelson, Stephen Lirette","doi":"10.1002/phar.2896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and anti-angiogenics, are first-line therapies for advanced and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. Although TKIs have a greater potential for off-target adverse effects compared with bevacizumab (anti-angiogenics), a direct comparison of the risk of cardiovascular adverse events between these two types of therapies has not been performed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the incidence of and characterize cardiovascular adverse events in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving TKIs versus bevacizumab.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study included adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who received first-line TKIs (sorafenib or lenvatinib) or bevacizumab at two academic medical centers and one community cancer center from September 2018 to August 2021. The primary outcome was risk of cardiovascular adverse events. Major secondary outcomes included the incidence of individual types of cardiovascular adverse events and risk factors associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 221 patients (159 TKI patients; 62 bevacizumab patients). At a median follow-up of 5 months, the probability of cardiovascular adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.85; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.58-1.24; p = 0.390). The cumulative incidence of cardiovascular events was highest in patients receiving lenvatinib (sub-distribution hazard ratio [SHR]: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.02-2.30) compared with those receiving sorafenib (reference) or bevacizumab (SHR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.68-1.64) after adjustment for comorbidities, liver transplant status, and presence of portal vein thrombosis at baseline. Cardiovascular adverse events were observed in 151 (68%) patients, and MACE were observed in 27 (12%) patients. Risk factors associated with MACE were hypertension (SHR: 3.5; 95% CI: 0.9087-15.83; p = 0.086), prior history of MACE (SHR: 2.01; 95% CI: 0.83-4.87; p = 0.124), and tobacco use (SHR: 2.85; 95% CI: 0.90-8.97; p = 0.074).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cardiovascular risk was not significantly different between TKIs and bevacizumab. Lenvatinib appears to have the highest risk of cardiovascular adverse events among these first-line VEGF inhibitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":20013,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"214-223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.2896","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and anti-angiogenics, are first-line therapies for advanced and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. Although TKIs have a greater potential for off-target adverse effects compared with bevacizumab (anti-angiogenics), a direct comparison of the risk of cardiovascular adverse events between these two types of therapies has not been performed.

Objective: To compare the incidence of and characterize cardiovascular adverse events in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving TKIs versus bevacizumab.

Methods: This cohort study included adult patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who received first-line TKIs (sorafenib or lenvatinib) or bevacizumab at two academic medical centers and one community cancer center from September 2018 to August 2021. The primary outcome was risk of cardiovascular adverse events. Major secondary outcomes included the incidence of individual types of cardiovascular adverse events and risk factors associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

Results: The study included 221 patients (159 TKI patients; 62 bevacizumab patients). At a median follow-up of 5 months, the probability of cardiovascular adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.85; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.58-1.24; p = 0.390). The cumulative incidence of cardiovascular events was highest in patients receiving lenvatinib (sub-distribution hazard ratio [SHR]: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.02-2.30) compared with those receiving sorafenib (reference) or bevacizumab (SHR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.68-1.64) after adjustment for comorbidities, liver transplant status, and presence of portal vein thrombosis at baseline. Cardiovascular adverse events were observed in 151 (68%) patients, and MACE were observed in 27 (12%) patients. Risk factors associated with MACE were hypertension (SHR: 3.5; 95% CI: 0.9087-15.83; p = 0.086), prior history of MACE (SHR: 2.01; 95% CI: 0.83-4.87; p = 0.124), and tobacco use (SHR: 2.85; 95% CI: 0.90-8.97; p = 0.074).

Conclusions: Cardiovascular risk was not significantly different between TKIs and bevacizumab. Lenvatinib appears to have the highest risk of cardiovascular adverse events among these first-line VEGF inhibitors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受血管内皮生长因子抑制剂治疗的肝癌患者心血管不良事件
背景:血管内皮生长因子抑制剂,包括酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)和抗血管生成药物,是晚期和转移性肝细胞癌的一线治疗药物。尽管与贝伐单抗相比,TKIs有更大的脱靶不良反应的可能性,但尚未对这两种治疗方法之间心血管不良事件的风险进行直接比较。目的:比较接受TKIs和贝伐单抗治疗的肝癌患者心血管不良事件的发生率和特征。方法:该队列研究纳入了2018年9月至2021年8月在两个学术医疗中心和一个社区癌症中心接受一线TKIs(索拉非尼或lenvatinib)或贝伐单抗治疗的成年肝癌患者。主要结局是心血管不良事件。主要次要结局包括个体类型心血管不良事件的发生率和与主要心血管不良事件(MACE)相关的危险因素。结果:共纳入221例患者(159例TKI患者;62例贝伐单抗患者)。中位随访5个月时,两组发生心血管不良事件的概率无显著差异(风险比[HR] 0.85;95%置信区间[95% CI] 0.58-1.24;P = 0.390)。在调整合共病、肝移植状况和基线时门静脉血栓形成后,接受lenvatinib的患者心血管事件累积发生率最高(亚分布风险比[SHR] 1.53, 95% CI: 1.01-2.30),而接受索拉非尼(参考)或贝伐单抗的患者(SHR 1.05, 95% CI: 0.68-1.64)。151例(68%)患者出现心血管不良事件,33例(16%)患者出现MACE。与MACE相关的危险因素有高血压(SHR为3.5,95% CI 0.87-14.22;P=0.079),既往MACE史(SHR 2.00, 95% CI 0.80-4.95;P=0.136)和烟草使用(SHR 2.82, 95% CI 0.89-8.96;P = 0.078)。结论:TKIs与贝伐单抗之间的心血管风险无显著差异。在这些一线VEGF抑制剂中,Lenvatinib似乎具有最高的心血管不良事件风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmacotherapy is devoted to publication of original research articles on all aspects of human pharmacology and review articles on drugs and drug therapy. The Editors and Editorial Board invite original research reports on pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and drug interaction studies, clinical trials, investigations of specific pharmacological properties of drugs, and related topics.
期刊最新文献
Aztreonam-avibactam: The dynamic duo against multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens. Challenges in renally eliminated medication use: Evaluating cystatin C and serum creatinine eGFR discordance. Utilization and associated factors of TPMT testing among Australian adults receiving thiopurines: A national retrospective data-linkage study. Association between mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and kidney harm: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Precision medicine to identify, prevent, and treat pediatric obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1