A revisited version of the disputatio for pharmacological training: An educational study

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Therapie Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.therap.2023.10.016
{"title":"A revisited version of the disputatio for pharmacological training: An educational study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.therap.2023.10.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The <em>disputatio</em> is a pedagogical method existing since the Middle-Ages where students had to debate about a question asked by a “master”, exercising their thinking and oratory skills. To move away from traditional vertical teaching methods, the <em>disputatio</em> has been revived by pharmacologists. Thus, for almost three successive years, several groups of young French pharmacologists and therapists confronted their ideas concerning a medical question at a therapeutic impasse. The aim here is to describe the initial feedback received from participants.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An anonymous questionnaire was sent by email in May 2023 to the participants of the different <em>disputationes</em> of 2019, 2022 and 2023. Participants were asked about different aspects of their feelings before, during and after the <em>disputatio</em><span>, using the 5-point Likert scale. They were also asked to describe the event in 2 to 5 words. Finally, participants could leave their comments in a free-field and were asked to give an overall satisfaction score out of 10.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of the 39 participants, 27 (69.2%) answered the questionnaire. Although 50% of respondents reported a feeling of anxiety before participating, most enjoyed the expert talks as well as working with people they did not know. Besides, over 66% reported having underestimated the skills they could share with colleagues from different backgrounds. Over 55% of respondents reported progress in methodology, and over 83% in pharmacology and/or therapeutics. Participants reported an overall satisfaction score of 8.6/10, and the main terms used to describe the event were “sharing”, “enriching” and “meeting”.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The <em>disputatio</em> is an innovative training program whose pedagogical and human values were underlined by most of the participants. Beyond pharmacology and therapeutics, the principle of <em>disputatio</em> could be extended to other disciplines, spanning the centuries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23147,"journal":{"name":"Therapie","volume":"79 4","pages":"Pages 435-441"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040595723001841","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The disputatio is a pedagogical method existing since the Middle-Ages where students had to debate about a question asked by a “master”, exercising their thinking and oratory skills. To move away from traditional vertical teaching methods, the disputatio has been revived by pharmacologists. Thus, for almost three successive years, several groups of young French pharmacologists and therapists confronted their ideas concerning a medical question at a therapeutic impasse. The aim here is to describe the initial feedback received from participants.

Methods

An anonymous questionnaire was sent by email in May 2023 to the participants of the different disputationes of 2019, 2022 and 2023. Participants were asked about different aspects of their feelings before, during and after the disputatio, using the 5-point Likert scale. They were also asked to describe the event in 2 to 5 words. Finally, participants could leave their comments in a free-field and were asked to give an overall satisfaction score out of 10.

Results

Out of the 39 participants, 27 (69.2%) answered the questionnaire. Although 50% of respondents reported a feeling of anxiety before participating, most enjoyed the expert talks as well as working with people they did not know. Besides, over 66% reported having underestimated the skills they could share with colleagues from different backgrounds. Over 55% of respondents reported progress in methodology, and over 83% in pharmacology and/or therapeutics. Participants reported an overall satisfaction score of 8.6/10, and the main terms used to describe the event were “sharing”, “enriching” and “meeting”.

Conclusion

The disputatio is an innovative training program whose pedagogical and human values were underlined by most of the participants. Beyond pharmacology and therapeutics, the principle of disputatio could be extended to other disciplines, spanning the centuries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药理学训练之争的重审版本:一项教育研究。
目的:辩论是一种自中世纪以来就存在的教学方法,学生必须就“大师”提出的问题进行辩论,锻炼他们的思维和演讲技巧。为了摆脱传统的垂直教学方法,药理学家们重新掀起了这场争论。因此,在几乎连续三年的时间里,几组年轻的法国药理学家和治疗师在治疗僵局中面对他们关于一个医学问题的想法。这里的目的是描述从参与者那里收到的最初反馈。方法:于2023年5月通过电子邮件向2019年、2022年和2023年不同争议的参与者发送匿名问卷。研究人员使用李克特5分制量表,询问参与者在争吵之前、期间和之后的不同感受。他们还被要求用2到5个词描述这一事件。最后,参与者可以在自由栏中留下他们的评论,并被要求给出总体满意度得分(满分为10分)。结果:39名参与者中,27人(69.2%)回答了问卷。尽管50%的受访者表示在参加之前感到焦虑,但大多数人都喜欢专家谈话以及与他们不认识的人一起工作。此外,超过66%的人表示低估了他们可以与不同背景的同事分享的技能。超过55%的答复者报告了方法学方面的进展,超过83%的答复者报告了药理学和/或治疗学方面的进展。参与者报告的总体满意度得分为8.6分(满分10分),用来描述这次活动的主要术语是“分享”、“充实”和“会议”。结论:辩论是一个创新的培训项目,其教学价值和人文价值得到了大多数参与者的重视。除了药理学和治疗学,争论的原则可以扩展到其他学科,跨越几个世纪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapie
Therapie 医学-药学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
132
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Thérapie is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to Clinical Pharmacology, Therapeutics, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacovigilance, Addictovigilance, Social Pharmacology, Pharmacoepidemiology, Pharmacoeconomics and Evidence-Based-Medicine. Thérapie publishes in French or in English original articles, general reviews, letters to the editor reporting original findings, correspondence relating to articles or letters published in the Journal, short articles, editorials on up-to-date topics, Pharmacovigilance or Addictovigilance reports that follow the French "guidelines" concerning good practice in pharmacovigilance publications. The journal also publishes thematic issues on topical subject. The journal is indexed in the main international data bases and notably in: Biosis Previews/Biological Abstracts, Embase/Excerpta Medica, Medline/Index Medicus, Science Citation Index.
期刊最新文献
[Over-the-counter non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications: Focus on the management of acute pain]. DRAMES and DTA databases: Complementary tools to monitor drug-related deaths in France. Inputs of pharmacoepidemiology in addictovigilance: How do they fit together? The contribution of addictovigilance data to the French medical cannabis experimentation. Attentes méthodologiques pour la démonstration de l’efficacité des produits de santé par les études observationnelles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1