Neonatal mortality risk of large-for-gestational-age and macrosomic live births in 15 countries, including 115.6 million nationwide linked records, 2000–2020

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2023-11-27 DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.17706
Lorena Suárez-Idueta, Eric O. Ohuma, Chia-Jung Chang, Elizabeth A. Hazel, Judith Yargawa, Yemisrach B. Okwaraji, Ellen Bradley, Adrienne Gordon, Jessica Sexton, Harriet L. S. Lawford, Enny S. Paixao, Ila R. Falcão, Sarka Lisonkova, Qi Wen, Petr Velebil, Jitka Jírová, Erzsebet Horváth-Puhó, Henrik T. Sørensen, Luule Sakkeus, Lili Abuladze, Khalid A. Yunis, Ayah Al Bizri, Sonia Lopez Alvarez, Lisa Broeders, Aimée E. van Dijk, Fawziya Alyafei, Mai AlQubaisi, Neda Razaz, Jonas Söderling, Lucy K. Smith, Ruth J. Matthews, Estelle Lowry, Neil Rowland, Rachael Wood, Kirsten Monteath, Isabel Pereyra, Gabriella Pravia, Joy E. Lawn, Hannah Blencowe, the National Vulnerable Newborn Mortality Collaborative Group and the Vulnerable Newborn Measurement Core Group
{"title":"Neonatal mortality risk of large-for-gestational-age and macrosomic live births in 15 countries, including 115.6 million nationwide linked records, 2000–2020","authors":"Lorena Suárez-Idueta,&nbsp;Eric O. Ohuma,&nbsp;Chia-Jung Chang,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Hazel,&nbsp;Judith Yargawa,&nbsp;Yemisrach B. Okwaraji,&nbsp;Ellen Bradley,&nbsp;Adrienne Gordon,&nbsp;Jessica Sexton,&nbsp;Harriet L. S. Lawford,&nbsp;Enny S. Paixao,&nbsp;Ila R. Falcão,&nbsp;Sarka Lisonkova,&nbsp;Qi Wen,&nbsp;Petr Velebil,&nbsp;Jitka Jírová,&nbsp;Erzsebet Horváth-Puhó,&nbsp;Henrik T. Sørensen,&nbsp;Luule Sakkeus,&nbsp;Lili Abuladze,&nbsp;Khalid A. Yunis,&nbsp;Ayah Al Bizri,&nbsp;Sonia Lopez Alvarez,&nbsp;Lisa Broeders,&nbsp;Aimée E. van Dijk,&nbsp;Fawziya Alyafei,&nbsp;Mai AlQubaisi,&nbsp;Neda Razaz,&nbsp;Jonas Söderling,&nbsp;Lucy K. Smith,&nbsp;Ruth J. Matthews,&nbsp;Estelle Lowry,&nbsp;Neil Rowland,&nbsp;Rachael Wood,&nbsp;Kirsten Monteath,&nbsp;Isabel Pereyra,&nbsp;Gabriella Pravia,&nbsp;Joy E. Lawn,&nbsp;Hannah Blencowe,&nbsp;the National Vulnerable Newborn Mortality Collaborative Group and the Vulnerable Newborn Measurement Core Group","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.17706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We aimed to compare the prevalence and neonatal mortality associated with large for gestational age (LGA) and macrosomia among 115.6 million live births in 15 countries, between 2000 and 2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Population-based, multi-country study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>National healthcare systems.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>Liveborn infants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used individual-level data identified for the Vulnerable Newborn Measurement Collaboration. We calculated the prevalence and relative risk (RR) of neonatal mortality among live births born at term + LGA (&gt;90th centile, and also &gt;95th and &gt;97th centiles when the data were available) versus term + appropriate for gestational age (AGA, 10th–90th centiles) and macrosomic (≥4000, ≥4500 and ≥5000 g, regardless of gestational age) versus 2500–3999 g. INTERGROWTH 21st served as the reference population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\n \n <p>Prevalence and neonatal mortality risks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Large for gestational age was common (median prevalence 18.2%; interquartile range, IQR, 13.5%–22.0%), and overall was associated with a lower neonatal mortality risk compared with AGA (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77–0.89). Around one in ten babies were ≥4000 g (median prevalence 9.6% (IQR 6.4%–13.3%), with 1.2% (IQR 0.7%–2.0%) ≥4500 g and with 0.2% (IQR 0.1%–0.2%) ≥5000 g). Overall, macrosomia of ≥4000 g was not associated with increased neonatal mortality risk (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69–0.94); however, a higher risk was observed for birthweights of ≥4500 g (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.10–2.11) and ≥5000 g (RR 4.54, 95% CI 2.58–7.99), compared with birthweights of 2500–3999 g, with the highest risk observed in the first 7 days of life.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this population, birthweight of ≥4500 g was the most useful marker for early mortality risk in big babies and could be used to guide clinical management decisions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 S8","pages":"S109-S120"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.17706","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17706","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We aimed to compare the prevalence and neonatal mortality associated with large for gestational age (LGA) and macrosomia among 115.6 million live births in 15 countries, between 2000 and 2020.

Design

Population-based, multi-country study.

Setting

National healthcare systems.

Population

Liveborn infants.

Methods

We used individual-level data identified for the Vulnerable Newborn Measurement Collaboration. We calculated the prevalence and relative risk (RR) of neonatal mortality among live births born at term + LGA (>90th centile, and also >95th and >97th centiles when the data were available) versus term + appropriate for gestational age (AGA, 10th–90th centiles) and macrosomic (≥4000, ≥4500 and ≥5000 g, regardless of gestational age) versus 2500–3999 g. INTERGROWTH 21st served as the reference population.

Main outcome measures

Prevalence and neonatal mortality risks.

Results

Large for gestational age was common (median prevalence 18.2%; interquartile range, IQR, 13.5%–22.0%), and overall was associated with a lower neonatal mortality risk compared with AGA (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.77–0.89). Around one in ten babies were ≥4000 g (median prevalence 9.6% (IQR 6.4%–13.3%), with 1.2% (IQR 0.7%–2.0%) ≥4500 g and with 0.2% (IQR 0.1%–0.2%) ≥5000 g). Overall, macrosomia of ≥4000 g was not associated with increased neonatal mortality risk (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69–0.94); however, a higher risk was observed for birthweights of ≥4500 g (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.10–2.11) and ≥5000 g (RR 4.54, 95% CI 2.58–7.99), compared with birthweights of 2500–3999 g, with the highest risk observed in the first 7 days of life.

Conclusions

In this population, birthweight of ≥4500 g was the most useful marker for early mortality risk in big babies and could be used to guide clinical management decisions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2000-2020年15个国家的大胎龄和特大胎活产新生儿死亡风险,包括1.156亿份全国相关记录
我们的目的是比较2000年至2020年间15个国家1.156亿活产婴儿中与大胎龄(LGA)和巨大儿相关的患病率和新生儿死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Author Reply. Effectiveness of Virtual Reality for Pain Relief in Procedures Related to Obstetrics and Gynaecology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Author Reply. Bereavement Care Experiences of Mothers Following Stillbirth and Neonatal Death: A Latent Class Analysis. Author Reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1